Cargando…
A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound
BACKGROUND: Over the past 40 years, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become a safe and effective tool for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications. A growing number of articles have been published annually. We aimed to explore global scientific outputs and hotspots of EUS published by different c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35425770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.869004 |
_version_ | 1784685810603261952 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Xiaoli He, Huiqin Chen, Xin Chen, Xueqin Wen, Zhenzhen Xu, Mengque Fang, Yanfei He, Xingkang |
author_facet | Chen, Xiaoli He, Huiqin Chen, Xin Chen, Xueqin Wen, Zhenzhen Xu, Mengque Fang, Yanfei He, Xingkang |
author_sort | Chen, Xiaoli |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Over the past 40 years, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become a safe and effective tool for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications. A growing number of articles have been published annually. We aimed to explore global scientific outputs and hotspots of EUS published by different countries, organizations, and authors. METHODS: The global literature regarding EUS during the 1900–2020 period was identified from the Web of Science (WOS) Core database. “Bibliometrix” and software VOSviewer were applied to perform bibliometric analysis. RESULTS: The annual growth rate of publications from 1980 to 2020 was around 16% and the number of EUS-related articles had experienced a sudden increase in the last decade. Bhutani MS was the most productive author over the past years, with 94 publications. Hawes RH had the highest number of citations, with 6,034 citations. The United States and institutions from United States dominated the EUS research. Among the journals, GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY published the highest number of articles, followed by ENDOSCOPY. The majority of top 10 frequently cited references were cited more than 200 times. Carcinoma, diagnosis, fine-needle-aspiration, cytology, and pancreatitis were the important keywords in co-occurrence analysis of keywords. Recent studies focused more on tissue acquisition, size of the needle, lumen-apposing metal stent, and fine-needle- biopsy. CONCLUSION: Research on EUS has significantly increased in the last decade globally and it will continue to increase. Active collaboration among different authors and countries was observed in the EUS field. Tissue acquisition, size of the needle, apposing metal stent, and fine-needle-biopsy might be the latest research frontiers and should receive more attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9002052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90020522022-04-13 A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound Chen, Xiaoli He, Huiqin Chen, Xin Chen, Xueqin Wen, Zhenzhen Xu, Mengque Fang, Yanfei He, Xingkang Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Over the past 40 years, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become a safe and effective tool for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications. A growing number of articles have been published annually. We aimed to explore global scientific outputs and hotspots of EUS published by different countries, organizations, and authors. METHODS: The global literature regarding EUS during the 1900–2020 period was identified from the Web of Science (WOS) Core database. “Bibliometrix” and software VOSviewer were applied to perform bibliometric analysis. RESULTS: The annual growth rate of publications from 1980 to 2020 was around 16% and the number of EUS-related articles had experienced a sudden increase in the last decade. Bhutani MS was the most productive author over the past years, with 94 publications. Hawes RH had the highest number of citations, with 6,034 citations. The United States and institutions from United States dominated the EUS research. Among the journals, GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY published the highest number of articles, followed by ENDOSCOPY. The majority of top 10 frequently cited references were cited more than 200 times. Carcinoma, diagnosis, fine-needle-aspiration, cytology, and pancreatitis were the important keywords in co-occurrence analysis of keywords. Recent studies focused more on tissue acquisition, size of the needle, lumen-apposing metal stent, and fine-needle- biopsy. CONCLUSION: Research on EUS has significantly increased in the last decade globally and it will continue to increase. Active collaboration among different authors and countries was observed in the EUS field. Tissue acquisition, size of the needle, apposing metal stent, and fine-needle-biopsy might be the latest research frontiers and should receive more attention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9002052/ /pubmed/35425770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.869004 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen, He, Chen, Chen, Wen, Xu, Fang and He. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Chen, Xiaoli He, Huiqin Chen, Xin Chen, Xueqin Wen, Zhenzhen Xu, Mengque Fang, Yanfei He, Xingkang A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound |
title | A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound |
title_full | A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound |
title_fullStr | A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound |
title_full_unstemmed | A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound |
title_short | A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound |
title_sort | bibliometric analysis of publications on endoscopic ultrasound |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35425770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.869004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenxiaoli abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT hehuiqin abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT chenxin abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT chenxueqin abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT wenzhenzhen abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT xumengque abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT fangyanfei abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT hexingkang abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT chenxiaoli bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT hehuiqin bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT chenxin bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT chenxueqin bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT wenzhenzhen bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT xumengque bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT fangyanfei bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound AT hexingkang bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound |