Cargando…

A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound

BACKGROUND: Over the past 40 years, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become a safe and effective tool for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications. A growing number of articles have been published annually. We aimed to explore global scientific outputs and hotspots of EUS published by different c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Xiaoli, He, Huiqin, Chen, Xin, Chen, Xueqin, Wen, Zhenzhen, Xu, Mengque, Fang, Yanfei, He, Xingkang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35425770
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.869004
_version_ 1784685810603261952
author Chen, Xiaoli
He, Huiqin
Chen, Xin
Chen, Xueqin
Wen, Zhenzhen
Xu, Mengque
Fang, Yanfei
He, Xingkang
author_facet Chen, Xiaoli
He, Huiqin
Chen, Xin
Chen, Xueqin
Wen, Zhenzhen
Xu, Mengque
Fang, Yanfei
He, Xingkang
author_sort Chen, Xiaoli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the past 40 years, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become a safe and effective tool for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications. A growing number of articles have been published annually. We aimed to explore global scientific outputs and hotspots of EUS published by different countries, organizations, and authors. METHODS: The global literature regarding EUS during the 1900–2020 period was identified from the Web of Science (WOS) Core database. “Bibliometrix” and software VOSviewer were applied to perform bibliometric analysis. RESULTS: The annual growth rate of publications from 1980 to 2020 was around 16% and the number of EUS-related articles had experienced a sudden increase in the last decade. Bhutani MS was the most productive author over the past years, with 94 publications. Hawes RH had the highest number of citations, with 6,034 citations. The United States and institutions from United States dominated the EUS research. Among the journals, GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY published the highest number of articles, followed by ENDOSCOPY. The majority of top 10 frequently cited references were cited more than 200 times. Carcinoma, diagnosis, fine-needle-aspiration, cytology, and pancreatitis were the important keywords in co-occurrence analysis of keywords. Recent studies focused more on tissue acquisition, size of the needle, lumen-apposing metal stent, and fine-needle- biopsy. CONCLUSION: Research on EUS has significantly increased in the last decade globally and it will continue to increase. Active collaboration among different authors and countries was observed in the EUS field. Tissue acquisition, size of the needle, apposing metal stent, and fine-needle-biopsy might be the latest research frontiers and should receive more attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9002052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90020522022-04-13 A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound Chen, Xiaoli He, Huiqin Chen, Xin Chen, Xueqin Wen, Zhenzhen Xu, Mengque Fang, Yanfei He, Xingkang Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Over the past 40 years, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become a safe and effective tool for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications. A growing number of articles have been published annually. We aimed to explore global scientific outputs and hotspots of EUS published by different countries, organizations, and authors. METHODS: The global literature regarding EUS during the 1900–2020 period was identified from the Web of Science (WOS) Core database. “Bibliometrix” and software VOSviewer were applied to perform bibliometric analysis. RESULTS: The annual growth rate of publications from 1980 to 2020 was around 16% and the number of EUS-related articles had experienced a sudden increase in the last decade. Bhutani MS was the most productive author over the past years, with 94 publications. Hawes RH had the highest number of citations, with 6,034 citations. The United States and institutions from United States dominated the EUS research. Among the journals, GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY published the highest number of articles, followed by ENDOSCOPY. The majority of top 10 frequently cited references were cited more than 200 times. Carcinoma, diagnosis, fine-needle-aspiration, cytology, and pancreatitis were the important keywords in co-occurrence analysis of keywords. Recent studies focused more on tissue acquisition, size of the needle, lumen-apposing metal stent, and fine-needle- biopsy. CONCLUSION: Research on EUS has significantly increased in the last decade globally and it will continue to increase. Active collaboration among different authors and countries was observed in the EUS field. Tissue acquisition, size of the needle, apposing metal stent, and fine-needle-biopsy might be the latest research frontiers and should receive more attention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9002052/ /pubmed/35425770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.869004 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen, He, Chen, Chen, Wen, Xu, Fang and He. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Chen, Xiaoli
He, Huiqin
Chen, Xin
Chen, Xueqin
Wen, Zhenzhen
Xu, Mengque
Fang, Yanfei
He, Xingkang
A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound
title A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound
title_full A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound
title_fullStr A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound
title_short A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Endoscopic Ultrasound
title_sort bibliometric analysis of publications on endoscopic ultrasound
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35425770
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.869004
work_keys_str_mv AT chenxiaoli abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT hehuiqin abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT chenxin abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT chenxueqin abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT wenzhenzhen abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT xumengque abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT fangyanfei abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT hexingkang abibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT chenxiaoli bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT hehuiqin bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT chenxin bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT chenxueqin bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT wenzhenzhen bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT xumengque bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT fangyanfei bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound
AT hexingkang bibliometricanalysisofpublicationsonendoscopicultrasound