Cargando…

Posterior INFIX for Treating Unilateral Unstable Sacral Fractures

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the treatment of unilateral unstable sacral fractures by fixation with the posterior INFIX (posterior pelvic ring screw‐rod internal fxation). METHODS: Data of 60 patients with unilateral unstable sacral fractures who underwent surgery from March 2013...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Haotian, Geng, Xin, Yu, Xiaokun, Chen, Wenhuan, Jia, Jian, Tian, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35343061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13251
_version_ 1784685814393864192
author Qi, Haotian
Geng, Xin
Yu, Xiaokun
Chen, Wenhuan
Jia, Jian
Tian, Wei
author_facet Qi, Haotian
Geng, Xin
Yu, Xiaokun
Chen, Wenhuan
Jia, Jian
Tian, Wei
author_sort Qi, Haotian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the treatment of unilateral unstable sacral fractures by fixation with the posterior INFIX (posterior pelvic ring screw‐rod internal fxation). METHODS: Data of 60 patients with unilateral unstable sacral fractures who underwent surgery from March 2013 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed according to the selection criteria. All patients were associated with anterior pelvic ring injuries, and the operations were performed by the same team of surgeons. According to the different types of internal fixation, the patients were divided into two groups, which both included 30 patients: the posterior INFIX group and iliosacral screw fixation group. The demographic and clinical data of the two patient groups, such as age, sex, sacral fracture types based on the Denis classification, operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative fluoros copy time, Majeed pelvic score at final follow‐up, and quality of fracture reduction based on Mears and Velyvis's imaging classification criteria were collected by the same researcher and compared statistically. RESULTS: All patients were continuously followed up for 23.17 ± 3.34 months (range, 12 to 46 months). All sacral fractures healed with an average healing time of 9.3 ± 2.24 months (range, 6 to 18 months). None of the patients had re‐displacement of the fracture or fixation failure. Compared to the iliosacral screw group, the posterior INFIX group patients had more intraoperative bleeding (t = 3.59, P < 0.001), shorter operation time (t = 4.49, P < 0.001), and shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy time (t = 6.26, P < 0.001). There were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, fracture type, Majeed score, and quality of fracture reduction (P > 0.05). In the posterior INFIX group, one patient had a superficial wound infection and one patient complained of discomfort due to a prominent fixation. In the iliosacral screw fixation group, one patient had intraoperative iatrogenic S1 nerve injury and vessel injury. The posterior INFIX fixation was a simpler manipulation with higher safety, shorter time of operation and intraoperative fluoroscopy, and similar clinical outcomes compared to iliosacral screw fixation. CONCLUSION: For the treatment of unilateral unstable sacral fractures, the posterior INFIX fixation can be recommended in clinic application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9002066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90020662022-04-15 Posterior INFIX for Treating Unilateral Unstable Sacral Fractures Qi, Haotian Geng, Xin Yu, Xiaokun Chen, Wenhuan Jia, Jian Tian, Wei Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the treatment of unilateral unstable sacral fractures by fixation with the posterior INFIX (posterior pelvic ring screw‐rod internal fxation). METHODS: Data of 60 patients with unilateral unstable sacral fractures who underwent surgery from March 2013 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed according to the selection criteria. All patients were associated with anterior pelvic ring injuries, and the operations were performed by the same team of surgeons. According to the different types of internal fixation, the patients were divided into two groups, which both included 30 patients: the posterior INFIX group and iliosacral screw fixation group. The demographic and clinical data of the two patient groups, such as age, sex, sacral fracture types based on the Denis classification, operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative fluoros copy time, Majeed pelvic score at final follow‐up, and quality of fracture reduction based on Mears and Velyvis's imaging classification criteria were collected by the same researcher and compared statistically. RESULTS: All patients were continuously followed up for 23.17 ± 3.34 months (range, 12 to 46 months). All sacral fractures healed with an average healing time of 9.3 ± 2.24 months (range, 6 to 18 months). None of the patients had re‐displacement of the fracture or fixation failure. Compared to the iliosacral screw group, the posterior INFIX group patients had more intraoperative bleeding (t = 3.59, P < 0.001), shorter operation time (t = 4.49, P < 0.001), and shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy time (t = 6.26, P < 0.001). There were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, fracture type, Majeed score, and quality of fracture reduction (P > 0.05). In the posterior INFIX group, one patient had a superficial wound infection and one patient complained of discomfort due to a prominent fixation. In the iliosacral screw fixation group, one patient had intraoperative iatrogenic S1 nerve injury and vessel injury. The posterior INFIX fixation was a simpler manipulation with higher safety, shorter time of operation and intraoperative fluoroscopy, and similar clinical outcomes compared to iliosacral screw fixation. CONCLUSION: For the treatment of unilateral unstable sacral fractures, the posterior INFIX fixation can be recommended in clinic application. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9002066/ /pubmed/35343061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13251 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Qi, Haotian
Geng, Xin
Yu, Xiaokun
Chen, Wenhuan
Jia, Jian
Tian, Wei
Posterior INFIX for Treating Unilateral Unstable Sacral Fractures
title Posterior INFIX for Treating Unilateral Unstable Sacral Fractures
title_full Posterior INFIX for Treating Unilateral Unstable Sacral Fractures
title_fullStr Posterior INFIX for Treating Unilateral Unstable Sacral Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Posterior INFIX for Treating Unilateral Unstable Sacral Fractures
title_short Posterior INFIX for Treating Unilateral Unstable Sacral Fractures
title_sort posterior infix for treating unilateral unstable sacral fractures
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35343061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13251
work_keys_str_mv AT qihaotian posteriorinfixfortreatingunilateralunstablesacralfractures
AT gengxin posteriorinfixfortreatingunilateralunstablesacralfractures
AT yuxiaokun posteriorinfixfortreatingunilateralunstablesacralfractures
AT chenwenhuan posteriorinfixfortreatingunilateralunstablesacralfractures
AT jiajian posteriorinfixfortreatingunilateralunstablesacralfractures
AT tianwei posteriorinfixfortreatingunilateralunstablesacralfractures