Cargando…

Effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures: a scoping review of global evidence from earlier stage of COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE: Social distancing is one of the main non-pharmaceutical interventions used in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. This scoping review aims to synthesise research findings on the effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures in the earlier stage of COVID-19 pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Kai Sing, Lau, Terence See Man, Yeoh, Eng Kiong, Chung, Vincent Chi Ho, Leung, Yin Shan, Yam, Carrie Ho Kwan, Hung, Chi Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053938
_version_ 1784685851962245120
author Sun, Kai Sing
Lau, Terence See Man
Yeoh, Eng Kiong
Chung, Vincent Chi Ho
Leung, Yin Shan
Yam, Carrie Ho Kwan
Hung, Chi Tim
author_facet Sun, Kai Sing
Lau, Terence See Man
Yeoh, Eng Kiong
Chung, Vincent Chi Ho
Leung, Yin Shan
Yam, Carrie Ho Kwan
Hung, Chi Tim
author_sort Sun, Kai Sing
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Social distancing is one of the main non-pharmaceutical interventions used in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. This scoping review aims to synthesise research findings on the effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures in the earlier stage of COVID-19 pandemic without the confounding effect of mass vaccination. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health and four other databases were searched for eligible studies on social distancing for COVID-19 published from inception of the databases to 30 September 2020. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Effectiveness studies on social distancing between individuals, school closures, workplace/business closures, public transport restrictions and partial/full lockdown were included. Non-English articles, studies in healthcare settings or not based on empirical data were excluded. RESULTS: After screening 1638 abstracts and 8 additional articles from other sources, 41 studies were included for synthesis of findings. The review found that the outcomes of social distancing measures were mainly indicated by changes in R(t), incidence and mortality, along with indirect indicators such as daily contact frequency and travel distance. There was adequate empirical evidence for the effect of social distancing at the individual level, and for partial or full lockdown at the community level. However, at the level of social settings, the evidence was moderate for school closure, and was limited for workplace/business closures as single targeted interventions. There was no evidence for a separate effect of public transport restriction. CONCLUSIONS: In the community setting, there was stronger evidence for the combined effect of different social distancing interventions than for a single intervention. As fatigue of preventive behaviours is an issue in public health agenda, future studies should analyse the risks in specific settings such as eateries and entertainment to implement and evaluate measures which are proportionate to the risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9002256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90022562022-04-15 Effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures: a scoping review of global evidence from earlier stage of COVID-19 pandemic Sun, Kai Sing Lau, Terence See Man Yeoh, Eng Kiong Chung, Vincent Chi Ho Leung, Yin Shan Yam, Carrie Ho Kwan Hung, Chi Tim BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVE: Social distancing is one of the main non-pharmaceutical interventions used in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. This scoping review aims to synthesise research findings on the effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures in the earlier stage of COVID-19 pandemic without the confounding effect of mass vaccination. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health and four other databases were searched for eligible studies on social distancing for COVID-19 published from inception of the databases to 30 September 2020. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Effectiveness studies on social distancing between individuals, school closures, workplace/business closures, public transport restrictions and partial/full lockdown were included. Non-English articles, studies in healthcare settings or not based on empirical data were excluded. RESULTS: After screening 1638 abstracts and 8 additional articles from other sources, 41 studies were included for synthesis of findings. The review found that the outcomes of social distancing measures were mainly indicated by changes in R(t), incidence and mortality, along with indirect indicators such as daily contact frequency and travel distance. There was adequate empirical evidence for the effect of social distancing at the individual level, and for partial or full lockdown at the community level. However, at the level of social settings, the evidence was moderate for school closure, and was limited for workplace/business closures as single targeted interventions. There was no evidence for a separate effect of public transport restriction. CONCLUSIONS: In the community setting, there was stronger evidence for the combined effect of different social distancing interventions than for a single intervention. As fatigue of preventive behaviours is an issue in public health agenda, future studies should analyse the risks in specific settings such as eateries and entertainment to implement and evaluate measures which are proportionate to the risk. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9002256/ /pubmed/35410924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053938 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Sun, Kai Sing
Lau, Terence See Man
Yeoh, Eng Kiong
Chung, Vincent Chi Ho
Leung, Yin Shan
Yam, Carrie Ho Kwan
Hung, Chi Tim
Effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures: a scoping review of global evidence from earlier stage of COVID-19 pandemic
title Effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures: a scoping review of global evidence from earlier stage of COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures: a scoping review of global evidence from earlier stage of COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures: a scoping review of global evidence from earlier stage of COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures: a scoping review of global evidence from earlier stage of COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures: a scoping review of global evidence from earlier stage of COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures: a scoping review of global evidence from earlier stage of covid-19 pandemic
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053938
work_keys_str_mv AT sunkaising effectivenessofdifferenttypesandlevelsofsocialdistancingmeasuresascopingreviewofglobalevidencefromearlierstageofcovid19pandemic
AT lauterenceseeman effectivenessofdifferenttypesandlevelsofsocialdistancingmeasuresascopingreviewofglobalevidencefromearlierstageofcovid19pandemic
AT yeohengkiong effectivenessofdifferenttypesandlevelsofsocialdistancingmeasuresascopingreviewofglobalevidencefromearlierstageofcovid19pandemic
AT chungvincentchiho effectivenessofdifferenttypesandlevelsofsocialdistancingmeasuresascopingreviewofglobalevidencefromearlierstageofcovid19pandemic
AT leungyinshan effectivenessofdifferenttypesandlevelsofsocialdistancingmeasuresascopingreviewofglobalevidencefromearlierstageofcovid19pandemic
AT yamcarriehokwan effectivenessofdifferenttypesandlevelsofsocialdistancingmeasuresascopingreviewofglobalevidencefromearlierstageofcovid19pandemic
AT hungchitim effectivenessofdifferenttypesandlevelsofsocialdistancingmeasuresascopingreviewofglobalevidencefromearlierstageofcovid19pandemic