Cargando…
Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry
In 2012, national recommendations for cervical cancer screening of women aged 30-64 years were quinquennial human papillomavirus and cytology cotesting or triennial cytology. Data from a statewide surveillance program in New Mexico demonstrated 65.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 64.6% to 65.7...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34463763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab173 |
_version_ | 1784685855469731840 |
---|---|
author | Castle, Philip E Kinney, Walter K Chen, Lu Kim, Jane J Jenison, Steven Rossi, Giovanna Kang, Huining Cuzick, Jack Wheeler, Cosette M |
author_facet | Castle, Philip E Kinney, Walter K Chen, Lu Kim, Jane J Jenison, Steven Rossi, Giovanna Kang, Huining Cuzick, Jack Wheeler, Cosette M |
author_sort | Castle, Philip E |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2012, national recommendations for cervical cancer screening of women aged 30-64 years were quinquennial human papillomavirus and cytology cotesting or triennial cytology. Data from a statewide surveillance program in New Mexico demonstrated 65.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 64.6% to 65.7%) of women screened in 2019 had a negative cotest within the last 3 years. Percentages of women screened in 2013, 2016, and 2019 with a prior negative cotest more than 5 years and up to 7 years ago were 2.6% (95% CI = 2.2% to 2.9%), 2.1% (95% CI = 1.9% to 2.2%), and 6.5% (95% CI = 6.2% to 6.8%), respectively (2-sided P(trend )< .001). Percentages of women screened in 2013, 2016, and 2019 with a prior negative cytology more than 5 years and up to 7 years ago were 3.8% (95% CI = 3.7% to 3.9%), 9.0% (95% CI = 8.7% to 9.3%), and 14.9% (95% CI = 14.4% to 15.4%), respectively (2-sided P(trend )< .001). Thus, in 2019, only 12.7% (95% CI = 12.4% to 13.1%) of the 30 215 women aged 30-64 years underwent cotesting and 27.7% (95% CI = 27.1% to 28.3%) of the 18 733 underwent cytology at the recommended interval. The observed under- and overscreening could result in increases in cervical cancer incidence and harms and costs, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9002271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90022712022-04-12 Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry Castle, Philip E Kinney, Walter K Chen, Lu Kim, Jane J Jenison, Steven Rossi, Giovanna Kang, Huining Cuzick, Jack Wheeler, Cosette M J Natl Cancer Inst Brief Communications In 2012, national recommendations for cervical cancer screening of women aged 30-64 years were quinquennial human papillomavirus and cytology cotesting or triennial cytology. Data from a statewide surveillance program in New Mexico demonstrated 65.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 64.6% to 65.7%) of women screened in 2019 had a negative cotest within the last 3 years. Percentages of women screened in 2013, 2016, and 2019 with a prior negative cotest more than 5 years and up to 7 years ago were 2.6% (95% CI = 2.2% to 2.9%), 2.1% (95% CI = 1.9% to 2.2%), and 6.5% (95% CI = 6.2% to 6.8%), respectively (2-sided P(trend )< .001). Percentages of women screened in 2013, 2016, and 2019 with a prior negative cytology more than 5 years and up to 7 years ago were 3.8% (95% CI = 3.7% to 3.9%), 9.0% (95% CI = 8.7% to 9.3%), and 14.9% (95% CI = 14.4% to 15.4%), respectively (2-sided P(trend )< .001). Thus, in 2019, only 12.7% (95% CI = 12.4% to 13.1%) of the 30 215 women aged 30-64 years underwent cotesting and 27.7% (95% CI = 27.1% to 28.3%) of the 18 733 underwent cytology at the recommended interval. The observed under- and overscreening could result in increases in cervical cancer incidence and harms and costs, respectively. Oxford University Press 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9002271/ /pubmed/34463763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab173 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Brief Communications Castle, Philip E Kinney, Walter K Chen, Lu Kim, Jane J Jenison, Steven Rossi, Giovanna Kang, Huining Cuzick, Jack Wheeler, Cosette M Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry |
title | Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry |
title_full | Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry |
title_fullStr | Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry |
title_short | Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry |
title_sort | adherence to national guidelines on cervical screening: a population-based evaluation from a statewide registry |
topic | Brief Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34463763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT castlephilipe adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry AT kinneywalterk adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry AT chenlu adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry AT kimjanej adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry AT jenisonsteven adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry AT rossigiovanna adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry AT kanghuining adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry AT cuzickjack adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry AT wheelercosettem adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry AT adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry AT adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry |