Cargando…

Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry

In 2012, national recommendations for cervical cancer screening of women aged 30-64 years were quinquennial human papillomavirus and cytology cotesting or triennial cytology. Data from a statewide surveillance program in New Mexico demonstrated 65.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 64.6% to 65.7...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castle, Philip E, Kinney, Walter K, Chen, Lu, Kim, Jane J, Jenison, Steven, Rossi, Giovanna, Kang, Huining, Cuzick, Jack, Wheeler, Cosette M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34463763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab173
_version_ 1784685855469731840
author Castle, Philip E
Kinney, Walter K
Chen, Lu
Kim, Jane J
Jenison, Steven
Rossi, Giovanna
Kang, Huining
Cuzick, Jack
Wheeler, Cosette M
author_facet Castle, Philip E
Kinney, Walter K
Chen, Lu
Kim, Jane J
Jenison, Steven
Rossi, Giovanna
Kang, Huining
Cuzick, Jack
Wheeler, Cosette M
author_sort Castle, Philip E
collection PubMed
description In 2012, national recommendations for cervical cancer screening of women aged 30-64 years were quinquennial human papillomavirus and cytology cotesting or triennial cytology. Data from a statewide surveillance program in New Mexico demonstrated 65.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 64.6% to 65.7%) of women screened in 2019 had a negative cotest within the last 3 years. Percentages of women screened in 2013, 2016, and 2019 with a prior negative cotest more than 5 years and up to 7 years ago were 2.6% (95% CI = 2.2% to 2.9%), 2.1% (95% CI = 1.9% to 2.2%), and 6.5% (95% CI = 6.2% to 6.8%), respectively (2-sided P(trend )< .001). Percentages of women screened in 2013, 2016, and 2019 with a prior negative cytology more than 5 years and up to 7 years ago were 3.8% (95% CI = 3.7% to 3.9%), 9.0% (95% CI = 8.7% to 9.3%), and 14.9% (95% CI = 14.4% to 15.4%), respectively (2-sided P(trend )< .001). Thus, in 2019, only 12.7% (95% CI = 12.4% to 13.1%) of the 30 215 women aged 30-64 years underwent cotesting and 27.7% (95% CI = 27.1% to 28.3%) of the 18 733 underwent cytology at the recommended interval. The observed under- and overscreening could result in increases in cervical cancer incidence and harms and costs, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9002271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90022712022-04-12 Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry Castle, Philip E Kinney, Walter K Chen, Lu Kim, Jane J Jenison, Steven Rossi, Giovanna Kang, Huining Cuzick, Jack Wheeler, Cosette M J Natl Cancer Inst Brief Communications In 2012, national recommendations for cervical cancer screening of women aged 30-64 years were quinquennial human papillomavirus and cytology cotesting or triennial cytology. Data from a statewide surveillance program in New Mexico demonstrated 65.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 64.6% to 65.7%) of women screened in 2019 had a negative cotest within the last 3 years. Percentages of women screened in 2013, 2016, and 2019 with a prior negative cotest more than 5 years and up to 7 years ago were 2.6% (95% CI = 2.2% to 2.9%), 2.1% (95% CI = 1.9% to 2.2%), and 6.5% (95% CI = 6.2% to 6.8%), respectively (2-sided P(trend )< .001). Percentages of women screened in 2013, 2016, and 2019 with a prior negative cytology more than 5 years and up to 7 years ago were 3.8% (95% CI = 3.7% to 3.9%), 9.0% (95% CI = 8.7% to 9.3%), and 14.9% (95% CI = 14.4% to 15.4%), respectively (2-sided P(trend )< .001). Thus, in 2019, only 12.7% (95% CI = 12.4% to 13.1%) of the 30 215 women aged 30-64 years underwent cotesting and 27.7% (95% CI = 27.1% to 28.3%) of the 18 733 underwent cytology at the recommended interval. The observed under- and overscreening could result in increases in cervical cancer incidence and harms and costs, respectively. Oxford University Press 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9002271/ /pubmed/34463763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab173 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Brief Communications
Castle, Philip E
Kinney, Walter K
Chen, Lu
Kim, Jane J
Jenison, Steven
Rossi, Giovanna
Kang, Huining
Cuzick, Jack
Wheeler, Cosette M
Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry
title Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry
title_full Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry
title_fullStr Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry
title_short Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation From a Statewide Registry
title_sort adherence to national guidelines on cervical screening: a population-based evaluation from a statewide registry
topic Brief Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34463763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab173
work_keys_str_mv AT castlephilipe adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry
AT kinneywalterk adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry
AT chenlu adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry
AT kimjanej adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry
AT jenisonsteven adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry
AT rossigiovanna adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry
AT kanghuining adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry
AT cuzickjack adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry
AT wheelercosettem adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry
AT adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry
AT adherencetonationalguidelinesoncervicalscreeningapopulationbasedevaluationfromastatewideregistry