Cargando…
Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans
A reliable diagnosis and accurate monitoring are pivotal steps for treatment and prevention of COVID-19. Chest computed tomography (CT) has been considered a crucial diagnostic imaging technique for the injury assessment of the viral pneumonia. Furthermore, the automatization of the segmentation met...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15593258221082896 |
_version_ | 1784685869976780800 |
---|---|
author | Aiello, Marco Baldi, Dario Esposito, Giuseppina Valentino, Marika Randon, Marco Salvatore, Marco Cavaliere, Carlo |
author_facet | Aiello, Marco Baldi, Dario Esposito, Giuseppina Valentino, Marika Randon, Marco Salvatore, Marco Cavaliere, Carlo |
author_sort | Aiello, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | A reliable diagnosis and accurate monitoring are pivotal steps for treatment and prevention of COVID-19. Chest computed tomography (CT) has been considered a crucial diagnostic imaging technique for the injury assessment of the viral pneumonia. Furthermore, the automatization of the segmentation methods for lung alterations helps to speed up the diagnosis and lighten radiologists’ workload. Considering the assiduous pathology monitoring, ultra-low dose (ULD) chest CT protocols have been implemented to drastically reduce the radiation burden. Unfortunately, the available AI technologies have not been trained on ULD-CT data and validated and their applicability deserves careful evaluation. Therefore, this work aims to compare the results of available AI tools (BCUnet, CORADS AI, NVIDIA CLARA Train SDK and CT Pneumonia Analysis) on a dataset of 73 CT examinations acquired both with conventional dose (CD) and ULD protocols. COVID-19 volume percentage, resulting from each tool, was statistically compared. This study demonstrated high comparability of the results on CD-CT and ULD-CT data among the four AI tools, with high correlation between the results obtained on both protocols (R > .68, P < .001, for all AI tools). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9002358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90023582022-04-13 Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans Aiello, Marco Baldi, Dario Esposito, Giuseppina Valentino, Marika Randon, Marco Salvatore, Marco Cavaliere, Carlo Dose Response Original Article A reliable diagnosis and accurate monitoring are pivotal steps for treatment and prevention of COVID-19. Chest computed tomography (CT) has been considered a crucial diagnostic imaging technique for the injury assessment of the viral pneumonia. Furthermore, the automatization of the segmentation methods for lung alterations helps to speed up the diagnosis and lighten radiologists’ workload. Considering the assiduous pathology monitoring, ultra-low dose (ULD) chest CT protocols have been implemented to drastically reduce the radiation burden. Unfortunately, the available AI technologies have not been trained on ULD-CT data and validated and their applicability deserves careful evaluation. Therefore, this work aims to compare the results of available AI tools (BCUnet, CORADS AI, NVIDIA CLARA Train SDK and CT Pneumonia Analysis) on a dataset of 73 CT examinations acquired both with conventional dose (CD) and ULD protocols. COVID-19 volume percentage, resulting from each tool, was statistically compared. This study demonstrated high comparability of the results on CD-CT and ULD-CT data among the four AI tools, with high correlation between the results obtained on both protocols (R > .68, P < .001, for all AI tools). SAGE Publications 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9002358/ /pubmed/35422680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15593258221082896 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Aiello, Marco Baldi, Dario Esposito, Giuseppina Valentino, Marika Randon, Marco Salvatore, Marco Cavaliere, Carlo Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans |
title | Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions
on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans |
title_full | Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions
on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions
on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions
on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans |
title_short | Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions
on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans |
title_sort | evaluation of ai-based segmentation tools for covid-19 lung lesions
on conventional and ultra-low dose ct scans |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15593258221082896 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aiellomarco evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans AT baldidario evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans AT espositogiuseppina evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans AT valentinomarika evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans AT randonmarco evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans AT salvatoremarco evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans AT cavalierecarlo evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans |