Cargando…

Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans

A reliable diagnosis and accurate monitoring are pivotal steps for treatment and prevention of COVID-19. Chest computed tomography (CT) has been considered a crucial diagnostic imaging technique for the injury assessment of the viral pneumonia. Furthermore, the automatization of the segmentation met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aiello, Marco, Baldi, Dario, Esposito, Giuseppina, Valentino, Marika, Randon, Marco, Salvatore, Marco, Cavaliere, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15593258221082896
_version_ 1784685869976780800
author Aiello, Marco
Baldi, Dario
Esposito, Giuseppina
Valentino, Marika
Randon, Marco
Salvatore, Marco
Cavaliere, Carlo
author_facet Aiello, Marco
Baldi, Dario
Esposito, Giuseppina
Valentino, Marika
Randon, Marco
Salvatore, Marco
Cavaliere, Carlo
author_sort Aiello, Marco
collection PubMed
description A reliable diagnosis and accurate monitoring are pivotal steps for treatment and prevention of COVID-19. Chest computed tomography (CT) has been considered a crucial diagnostic imaging technique for the injury assessment of the viral pneumonia. Furthermore, the automatization of the segmentation methods for lung alterations helps to speed up the diagnosis and lighten radiologists’ workload. Considering the assiduous pathology monitoring, ultra-low dose (ULD) chest CT protocols have been implemented to drastically reduce the radiation burden. Unfortunately, the available AI technologies have not been trained on ULD-CT data and validated and their applicability deserves careful evaluation. Therefore, this work aims to compare the results of available AI tools (BCUnet, CORADS AI, NVIDIA CLARA Train SDK and CT Pneumonia Analysis) on a dataset of 73 CT examinations acquired both with conventional dose (CD) and ULD protocols. COVID-19 volume percentage, resulting from each tool, was statistically compared. This study demonstrated high comparability of the results on CD-CT and ULD-CT data among the four AI tools, with high correlation between the results obtained on both protocols (R > .68, P < .001, for all AI tools).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9002358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90023582022-04-13 Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans Aiello, Marco Baldi, Dario Esposito, Giuseppina Valentino, Marika Randon, Marco Salvatore, Marco Cavaliere, Carlo Dose Response Original Article A reliable diagnosis and accurate monitoring are pivotal steps for treatment and prevention of COVID-19. Chest computed tomography (CT) has been considered a crucial diagnostic imaging technique for the injury assessment of the viral pneumonia. Furthermore, the automatization of the segmentation methods for lung alterations helps to speed up the diagnosis and lighten radiologists’ workload. Considering the assiduous pathology monitoring, ultra-low dose (ULD) chest CT protocols have been implemented to drastically reduce the radiation burden. Unfortunately, the available AI technologies have not been trained on ULD-CT data and validated and their applicability deserves careful evaluation. Therefore, this work aims to compare the results of available AI tools (BCUnet, CORADS AI, NVIDIA CLARA Train SDK and CT Pneumonia Analysis) on a dataset of 73 CT examinations acquired both with conventional dose (CD) and ULD protocols. COVID-19 volume percentage, resulting from each tool, was statistically compared. This study demonstrated high comparability of the results on CD-CT and ULD-CT data among the four AI tools, with high correlation between the results obtained on both protocols (R > .68, P < .001, for all AI tools). SAGE Publications 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9002358/ /pubmed/35422680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15593258221082896 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Aiello, Marco
Baldi, Dario
Esposito, Giuseppina
Valentino, Marika
Randon, Marco
Salvatore, Marco
Cavaliere, Carlo
Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans
title Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans
title_full Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans
title_fullStr Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans
title_short Evaluation of AI-Based Segmentation Tools for COVID-19 Lung Lesions on Conventional and Ultra-low Dose CT Scans
title_sort evaluation of ai-based segmentation tools for covid-19 lung lesions on conventional and ultra-low dose ct scans
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15593258221082896
work_keys_str_mv AT aiellomarco evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans
AT baldidario evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans
AT espositogiuseppina evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans
AT valentinomarika evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans
AT randonmarco evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans
AT salvatoremarco evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans
AT cavalierecarlo evaluationofaibasedsegmentationtoolsforcovid19lunglesionsonconventionalandultralowdosectscans