Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures
Industrial workplaces expose workers to a high risk of injuries such as Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). Exoskeletons are wearable robotic technologies that can be used to reduce the loads exerted on the body’s joints and reduce the occurrence of WMSDs. However, current studies show t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35408328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072714 |
_version_ | 1784685875505922048 |
---|---|
author | Golabchi, Ali Chao, Andrew Tavakoli, Mahdi |
author_facet | Golabchi, Ali Chao, Andrew Tavakoli, Mahdi |
author_sort | Golabchi, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | Industrial workplaces expose workers to a high risk of injuries such as Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). Exoskeletons are wearable robotic technologies that can be used to reduce the loads exerted on the body’s joints and reduce the occurrence of WMSDs. However, current studies show that the deployment of industrial exoskeletons is still limited, and widespread adoption depends on different factors, including efficacy evaluation metrics, target tasks, and supported body postures. Given that exoskeletons are not yet adopted to their full potential, we propose a review based on these three evaluation dimensions that guides researchers and practitioners in properly evaluating and selecting exoskeletons and using them effectively in workplaces. Specifically, evaluating an exoskeleton needs to incorporate: (1) efficacy evaluation metrics based on both subjective (e.g., user perception) and objective (e.g., physiological measurements from sensors) measures, (2) target tasks (e.g., manual material handling and the use of tools), and (3) the body postures adopted (e.g., squatting and stooping). This framework is meant to guide the implementation and assessment of exoskeletons and provide recommendations addressing potential challenges in the adoption of industrial exoskeletons. The ultimate goal is to use the framework to enhance the acceptance and adoption of exoskeletons and to minimize future WMSDs in industrial workplaces. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9002381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90023812022-04-13 A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures Golabchi, Ali Chao, Andrew Tavakoli, Mahdi Sensors (Basel) Review Industrial workplaces expose workers to a high risk of injuries such as Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). Exoskeletons are wearable robotic technologies that can be used to reduce the loads exerted on the body’s joints and reduce the occurrence of WMSDs. However, current studies show that the deployment of industrial exoskeletons is still limited, and widespread adoption depends on different factors, including efficacy evaluation metrics, target tasks, and supported body postures. Given that exoskeletons are not yet adopted to their full potential, we propose a review based on these three evaluation dimensions that guides researchers and practitioners in properly evaluating and selecting exoskeletons and using them effectively in workplaces. Specifically, evaluating an exoskeleton needs to incorporate: (1) efficacy evaluation metrics based on both subjective (e.g., user perception) and objective (e.g., physiological measurements from sensors) measures, (2) target tasks (e.g., manual material handling and the use of tools), and (3) the body postures adopted (e.g., squatting and stooping). This framework is meant to guide the implementation and assessment of exoskeletons and provide recommendations addressing potential challenges in the adoption of industrial exoskeletons. The ultimate goal is to use the framework to enhance the acceptance and adoption of exoskeletons and to minimize future WMSDs in industrial workplaces. MDPI 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9002381/ /pubmed/35408328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072714 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Golabchi, Ali Chao, Andrew Tavakoli, Mahdi A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures |
title | A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures |
title_sort | systematic review of industrial exoskeletons for injury prevention: efficacy evaluation metrics, target tasks, and supported body postures |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35408328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT golabchiali asystematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures AT chaoandrew asystematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures AT tavakolimahdi asystematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures AT golabchiali systematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures AT chaoandrew systematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures AT tavakolimahdi systematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures |