Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures

Industrial workplaces expose workers to a high risk of injuries such as Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). Exoskeletons are wearable robotic technologies that can be used to reduce the loads exerted on the body’s joints and reduce the occurrence of WMSDs. However, current studies show t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golabchi, Ali, Chao, Andrew, Tavakoli, Mahdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35408328
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072714
_version_ 1784685875505922048
author Golabchi, Ali
Chao, Andrew
Tavakoli, Mahdi
author_facet Golabchi, Ali
Chao, Andrew
Tavakoli, Mahdi
author_sort Golabchi, Ali
collection PubMed
description Industrial workplaces expose workers to a high risk of injuries such as Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). Exoskeletons are wearable robotic technologies that can be used to reduce the loads exerted on the body’s joints and reduce the occurrence of WMSDs. However, current studies show that the deployment of industrial exoskeletons is still limited, and widespread adoption depends on different factors, including efficacy evaluation metrics, target tasks, and supported body postures. Given that exoskeletons are not yet adopted to their full potential, we propose a review based on these three evaluation dimensions that guides researchers and practitioners in properly evaluating and selecting exoskeletons and using them effectively in workplaces. Specifically, evaluating an exoskeleton needs to incorporate: (1) efficacy evaluation metrics based on both subjective (e.g., user perception) and objective (e.g., physiological measurements from sensors) measures, (2) target tasks (e.g., manual material handling and the use of tools), and (3) the body postures adopted (e.g., squatting and stooping). This framework is meant to guide the implementation and assessment of exoskeletons and provide recommendations addressing potential challenges in the adoption of industrial exoskeletons. The ultimate goal is to use the framework to enhance the acceptance and adoption of exoskeletons and to minimize future WMSDs in industrial workplaces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9002381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90023812022-04-13 A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures Golabchi, Ali Chao, Andrew Tavakoli, Mahdi Sensors (Basel) Review Industrial workplaces expose workers to a high risk of injuries such as Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). Exoskeletons are wearable robotic technologies that can be used to reduce the loads exerted on the body’s joints and reduce the occurrence of WMSDs. However, current studies show that the deployment of industrial exoskeletons is still limited, and widespread adoption depends on different factors, including efficacy evaluation metrics, target tasks, and supported body postures. Given that exoskeletons are not yet adopted to their full potential, we propose a review based on these three evaluation dimensions that guides researchers and practitioners in properly evaluating and selecting exoskeletons and using them effectively in workplaces. Specifically, evaluating an exoskeleton needs to incorporate: (1) efficacy evaluation metrics based on both subjective (e.g., user perception) and objective (e.g., physiological measurements from sensors) measures, (2) target tasks (e.g., manual material handling and the use of tools), and (3) the body postures adopted (e.g., squatting and stooping). This framework is meant to guide the implementation and assessment of exoskeletons and provide recommendations addressing potential challenges in the adoption of industrial exoskeletons. The ultimate goal is to use the framework to enhance the acceptance and adoption of exoskeletons and to minimize future WMSDs in industrial workplaces. MDPI 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9002381/ /pubmed/35408328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072714 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Golabchi, Ali
Chao, Andrew
Tavakoli, Mahdi
A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures
title A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures
title_full A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures
title_short A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures
title_sort systematic review of industrial exoskeletons for injury prevention: efficacy evaluation metrics, target tasks, and supported body postures
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35408328
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072714
work_keys_str_mv AT golabchiali asystematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures
AT chaoandrew asystematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures
AT tavakolimahdi asystematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures
AT golabchiali systematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures
AT chaoandrew systematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures
AT tavakolimahdi systematicreviewofindustrialexoskeletonsforinjurypreventionefficacyevaluationmetricstargettasksandsupportedbodypostures