Cargando…
Dirichlet process mixture models for single-cell RNA-seq clustering
Clustering of cells based on gene expression is one of the major steps in single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis. One key challenge in cluster analysis is the unknown number of clusters and, for this issue, there is still no comprehensive solution. To enhance the process of defining me...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Company of Biologists Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35237784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.059001 |
_version_ | 1784685976947261440 |
---|---|
author | Adossa, Nigatu A. Rytkönen, Kalle T. Elo, Laura L. |
author_facet | Adossa, Nigatu A. Rytkönen, Kalle T. Elo, Laura L. |
author_sort | Adossa, Nigatu A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clustering of cells based on gene expression is one of the major steps in single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis. One key challenge in cluster analysis is the unknown number of clusters and, for this issue, there is still no comprehensive solution. To enhance the process of defining meaningful cluster resolution, we compare Bayesian latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) method to its non-parametric counterpart, hierarchical Dirichlet process (HDP) in the context of clustering scRNA-seq data. A potential main advantage of HDP is that it does not require the number of clusters as an input parameter from the user. While LDA has been used in single-cell data analysis, it has not been compared in detail with HDP. Here, we compare the cell clustering performance of LDA and HDP using four scRNA-seq datasets (immune cells, kidney, pancreas and decidua/placenta), with a specific focus on cluster numbers. Using both intrinsic (DB-index) and extrinsic (ARI) cluster quality measures, we show that the performance of LDA and HDP is dataset dependent. We describe a case where HDP produced a more appropriate clustering compared to the best performer from a series of LDA clusterings with different numbers of clusters. However, we also observed cases where the best performing LDA cluster numbers appropriately capture the main biological features while HDP tended to inflate the number of clusters. Overall, our study highlights the importance of carefully assessing the number of clusters when analyzing scRNA-seq data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9002799 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Company of Biologists Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90027992022-04-12 Dirichlet process mixture models for single-cell RNA-seq clustering Adossa, Nigatu A. Rytkönen, Kalle T. Elo, Laura L. Biol Open Methods and Techniques Clustering of cells based on gene expression is one of the major steps in single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis. One key challenge in cluster analysis is the unknown number of clusters and, for this issue, there is still no comprehensive solution. To enhance the process of defining meaningful cluster resolution, we compare Bayesian latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) method to its non-parametric counterpart, hierarchical Dirichlet process (HDP) in the context of clustering scRNA-seq data. A potential main advantage of HDP is that it does not require the number of clusters as an input parameter from the user. While LDA has been used in single-cell data analysis, it has not been compared in detail with HDP. Here, we compare the cell clustering performance of LDA and HDP using four scRNA-seq datasets (immune cells, kidney, pancreas and decidua/placenta), with a specific focus on cluster numbers. Using both intrinsic (DB-index) and extrinsic (ARI) cluster quality measures, we show that the performance of LDA and HDP is dataset dependent. We describe a case where HDP produced a more appropriate clustering compared to the best performer from a series of LDA clusterings with different numbers of clusters. However, we also observed cases where the best performing LDA cluster numbers appropriately capture the main biological features while HDP tended to inflate the number of clusters. Overall, our study highlights the importance of carefully assessing the number of clusters when analyzing scRNA-seq data. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9002799/ /pubmed/35237784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.059001 Text en © 2022. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Methods and Techniques Adossa, Nigatu A. Rytkönen, Kalle T. Elo, Laura L. Dirichlet process mixture models for single-cell RNA-seq clustering |
title | Dirichlet process mixture models for single-cell RNA-seq clustering |
title_full | Dirichlet process mixture models for single-cell RNA-seq clustering |
title_fullStr | Dirichlet process mixture models for single-cell RNA-seq clustering |
title_full_unstemmed | Dirichlet process mixture models for single-cell RNA-seq clustering |
title_short | Dirichlet process mixture models for single-cell RNA-seq clustering |
title_sort | dirichlet process mixture models for single-cell rna-seq clustering |
topic | Methods and Techniques |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35237784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.059001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adossanigatua dirichletprocessmixturemodelsforsinglecellrnaseqclustering AT rytkonenkallet dirichletprocessmixturemodelsforsinglecellrnaseqclustering AT elolaural dirichletprocessmixturemodelsforsinglecellrnaseqclustering |