Cargando…
Portable Medical Suction and Aspirator Devices: Are the Design and Performance Standards Relevant?
Airway clearance refers to the clearing of any airway blockage caused due to foreign objects such as mud, gravel, and biomaterials such as blood, vomit, or teeth fragments using the technology of choice, portable suction devices. Currently available devices are either too heavy and bulky to be carri...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35408130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072515 |
_version_ | 1784685991372521472 |
---|---|
author | Peri, Saketh R. Akhter, Forhad De Lorenzo, Robert A. Hood, R. Lyle |
author_facet | Peri, Saketh R. Akhter, Forhad De Lorenzo, Robert A. Hood, R. Lyle |
author_sort | Peri, Saketh R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Airway clearance refers to the clearing of any airway blockage caused due to foreign objects such as mud, gravel, and biomaterials such as blood, vomit, or teeth fragments using the technology of choice, portable suction devices. Currently available devices are either too heavy and bulky to be carried, or insufficiently powered to be useful despite being in accordance with the ISO 10079-1 standards. When applied to portable suction, the design and testing standards lack clinical relevancy, which is evidenced by how available portable suction devices are sparingly used in pre-hospital situations. Lack of clinical relevancy despite being in accordance with design/manufacturing standards arise due to little if any collaboration between those developing clinical standards and the bodies that maintain design and manufacturing standards. An updated set of standards is required that accurately reflects evidence-based requirements and specifications, which should promote valid, rational, and relevant engineering designs and manufacturing standards in consideration of the unique scenarios facing prehospital casualty care. This paper aims to critically review the existing standards for portable suction devices and propose modifications based on the evidence and requirements, especially for civilian prehospital and combat casualty care situations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9002857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90028572022-04-13 Portable Medical Suction and Aspirator Devices: Are the Design and Performance Standards Relevant? Peri, Saketh R. Akhter, Forhad De Lorenzo, Robert A. Hood, R. Lyle Sensors (Basel) Hypothesis Airway clearance refers to the clearing of any airway blockage caused due to foreign objects such as mud, gravel, and biomaterials such as blood, vomit, or teeth fragments using the technology of choice, portable suction devices. Currently available devices are either too heavy and bulky to be carried, or insufficiently powered to be useful despite being in accordance with the ISO 10079-1 standards. When applied to portable suction, the design and testing standards lack clinical relevancy, which is evidenced by how available portable suction devices are sparingly used in pre-hospital situations. Lack of clinical relevancy despite being in accordance with design/manufacturing standards arise due to little if any collaboration between those developing clinical standards and the bodies that maintain design and manufacturing standards. An updated set of standards is required that accurately reflects evidence-based requirements and specifications, which should promote valid, rational, and relevant engineering designs and manufacturing standards in consideration of the unique scenarios facing prehospital casualty care. This paper aims to critically review the existing standards for portable suction devices and propose modifications based on the evidence and requirements, especially for civilian prehospital and combat casualty care situations. MDPI 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9002857/ /pubmed/35408130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072515 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Hypothesis Peri, Saketh R. Akhter, Forhad De Lorenzo, Robert A. Hood, R. Lyle Portable Medical Suction and Aspirator Devices: Are the Design and Performance Standards Relevant? |
title | Portable Medical Suction and Aspirator Devices: Are the Design and Performance Standards Relevant? |
title_full | Portable Medical Suction and Aspirator Devices: Are the Design and Performance Standards Relevant? |
title_fullStr | Portable Medical Suction and Aspirator Devices: Are the Design and Performance Standards Relevant? |
title_full_unstemmed | Portable Medical Suction and Aspirator Devices: Are the Design and Performance Standards Relevant? |
title_short | Portable Medical Suction and Aspirator Devices: Are the Design and Performance Standards Relevant? |
title_sort | portable medical suction and aspirator devices: are the design and performance standards relevant? |
topic | Hypothesis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35408130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072515 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perisakethr portablemedicalsuctionandaspiratordevicesarethedesignandperformancestandardsrelevant AT akhterforhad portablemedicalsuctionandaspiratordevicesarethedesignandperformancestandardsrelevant AT delorenzoroberta portablemedicalsuctionandaspiratordevicesarethedesignandperformancestandardsrelevant AT hoodrlyle portablemedicalsuctionandaspiratordevicesarethedesignandperformancestandardsrelevant |