Cargando…

Different methods of eubiotic feed additive provision affect the health, performance, fermentation, and metabolic status of dairy calves during the preweaning period

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate whether different methods of providing eubiotic feed additives to neonatal calves, during the preweaning period, can improve the calves’ health, performance, ruminal fermentation, and metabolic status. Forty-four (3-day-old) Holstein–Friesian dairy calves (22...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stefańska, Barbara, Katzer, Frank, Golińska, Barbara, Sobolewska, Patrycja, Smulski, Sebastian, Frankiewicz, Andrzej, Nowak, Włodzimierz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03239-y
_version_ 1784686067522207744
author Stefańska, Barbara
Katzer, Frank
Golińska, Barbara
Sobolewska, Patrycja
Smulski, Sebastian
Frankiewicz, Andrzej
Nowak, Włodzimierz
author_facet Stefańska, Barbara
Katzer, Frank
Golińska, Barbara
Sobolewska, Patrycja
Smulski, Sebastian
Frankiewicz, Andrzej
Nowak, Włodzimierz
author_sort Stefańska, Barbara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate whether different methods of providing eubiotic feed additives to neonatal calves, during the preweaning period, can improve the calves’ health, performance, ruminal fermentation, and metabolic status. Forty-four (3-day-old) Holstein–Friesian dairy calves (22 female and 22 male) were divided into four treatment groups for the duration of the 8-week trial. The eubiotic feed additive consisted of a combination of probiotic Lactobacillus spp. (multiple-strains at a dose of 250 mg/calf/day) and phytobiotics containing rosmarinic acid, as the main bioactive compound (at a dose of 50 mg/calf/day). The groups were named: CON (control, without eubiotic in either the milk replacer or the starter feed), MR (eubiotic in the milk replacer), SF (eubiotic in the starter feed), MRS (eubiotic in both the milk replacer and the starter feed). The individual intake of starter feed and the fecal scores were measured daily, and body weight and biometric measurements were taken weekly until calves were 56 days of age. Blood samples were collected on day 3 and then every 14 days to determine concentrations of insulin-like-growth-factor-I, β-hydroxybutyrate, non-esterified fatty acids, and blood urea nitrogen. Ruminal fluid was collected on days 28 and 56 for short-chain fatty acids, NH(3)-N, and pH measurements. RESULTS: The body weight of the calves of the MR treatment group was higher compared to all other groups on days 28 and 56. Including the eubiotic feed additive in the milk replacer increased average daily gain, starter intake, and total dry matter intake from day 29 to day 56 and the overall experimental period compared to the CON group. The calves with MR treatment had lower fecal scores from days 3 to 28, a number of parasite oocysts/cysts per gram of feces on day 28, and the occurrences of fecal consistency scores of 3 (mild diarrhea) and 4 (severe diarrhea) were 3.2 and 3.0 times lower, respectively, compared with the CON group. The MR group had higher ruminal concentrations of short-chain-fatty-acids, propionate, and butyrate on day 56 than the CON group. Adding eubiotics into milk replacer resulted in the highest concentrations of blood insulin-like-growth-factor-I and β-hydroxybutyrate from days 29 to 56 and the overall experimental period. CONCLUSION: The addition of eubiotic feed additives into the milk replacer can improve health, performance, ruminal fermentation, and biochemical blood indices in dairy calves during the preweaning period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9003169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90031692022-04-12 Different methods of eubiotic feed additive provision affect the health, performance, fermentation, and metabolic status of dairy calves during the preweaning period Stefańska, Barbara Katzer, Frank Golińska, Barbara Sobolewska, Patrycja Smulski, Sebastian Frankiewicz, Andrzej Nowak, Włodzimierz BMC Vet Res Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate whether different methods of providing eubiotic feed additives to neonatal calves, during the preweaning period, can improve the calves’ health, performance, ruminal fermentation, and metabolic status. Forty-four (3-day-old) Holstein–Friesian dairy calves (22 female and 22 male) were divided into four treatment groups for the duration of the 8-week trial. The eubiotic feed additive consisted of a combination of probiotic Lactobacillus spp. (multiple-strains at a dose of 250 mg/calf/day) and phytobiotics containing rosmarinic acid, as the main bioactive compound (at a dose of 50 mg/calf/day). The groups were named: CON (control, without eubiotic in either the milk replacer or the starter feed), MR (eubiotic in the milk replacer), SF (eubiotic in the starter feed), MRS (eubiotic in both the milk replacer and the starter feed). The individual intake of starter feed and the fecal scores were measured daily, and body weight and biometric measurements were taken weekly until calves were 56 days of age. Blood samples were collected on day 3 and then every 14 days to determine concentrations of insulin-like-growth-factor-I, β-hydroxybutyrate, non-esterified fatty acids, and blood urea nitrogen. Ruminal fluid was collected on days 28 and 56 for short-chain fatty acids, NH(3)-N, and pH measurements. RESULTS: The body weight of the calves of the MR treatment group was higher compared to all other groups on days 28 and 56. Including the eubiotic feed additive in the milk replacer increased average daily gain, starter intake, and total dry matter intake from day 29 to day 56 and the overall experimental period compared to the CON group. The calves with MR treatment had lower fecal scores from days 3 to 28, a number of parasite oocysts/cysts per gram of feces on day 28, and the occurrences of fecal consistency scores of 3 (mild diarrhea) and 4 (severe diarrhea) were 3.2 and 3.0 times lower, respectively, compared with the CON group. The MR group had higher ruminal concentrations of short-chain-fatty-acids, propionate, and butyrate on day 56 than the CON group. Adding eubiotics into milk replacer resulted in the highest concentrations of blood insulin-like-growth-factor-I and β-hydroxybutyrate from days 29 to 56 and the overall experimental period. CONCLUSION: The addition of eubiotic feed additives into the milk replacer can improve health, performance, ruminal fermentation, and biochemical blood indices in dairy calves during the preweaning period. BioMed Central 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9003169/ /pubmed/35413974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03239-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Stefańska, Barbara
Katzer, Frank
Golińska, Barbara
Sobolewska, Patrycja
Smulski, Sebastian
Frankiewicz, Andrzej
Nowak, Włodzimierz
Different methods of eubiotic feed additive provision affect the health, performance, fermentation, and metabolic status of dairy calves during the preweaning period
title Different methods of eubiotic feed additive provision affect the health, performance, fermentation, and metabolic status of dairy calves during the preweaning period
title_full Different methods of eubiotic feed additive provision affect the health, performance, fermentation, and metabolic status of dairy calves during the preweaning period
title_fullStr Different methods of eubiotic feed additive provision affect the health, performance, fermentation, and metabolic status of dairy calves during the preweaning period
title_full_unstemmed Different methods of eubiotic feed additive provision affect the health, performance, fermentation, and metabolic status of dairy calves during the preweaning period
title_short Different methods of eubiotic feed additive provision affect the health, performance, fermentation, and metabolic status of dairy calves during the preweaning period
title_sort different methods of eubiotic feed additive provision affect the health, performance, fermentation, and metabolic status of dairy calves during the preweaning period
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03239-y
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanskabarbara differentmethodsofeubioticfeedadditiveprovisionaffectthehealthperformancefermentationandmetabolicstatusofdairycalvesduringthepreweaningperiod
AT katzerfrank differentmethodsofeubioticfeedadditiveprovisionaffectthehealthperformancefermentationandmetabolicstatusofdairycalvesduringthepreweaningperiod
AT golinskabarbara differentmethodsofeubioticfeedadditiveprovisionaffectthehealthperformancefermentationandmetabolicstatusofdairycalvesduringthepreweaningperiod
AT sobolewskapatrycja differentmethodsofeubioticfeedadditiveprovisionaffectthehealthperformancefermentationandmetabolicstatusofdairycalvesduringthepreweaningperiod
AT smulskisebastian differentmethodsofeubioticfeedadditiveprovisionaffectthehealthperformancefermentationandmetabolicstatusofdairycalvesduringthepreweaningperiod
AT frankiewiczandrzej differentmethodsofeubioticfeedadditiveprovisionaffectthehealthperformancefermentationandmetabolicstatusofdairycalvesduringthepreweaningperiod
AT nowakwłodzimierz differentmethodsofeubioticfeedadditiveprovisionaffectthehealthperformancefermentationandmetabolicstatusofdairycalvesduringthepreweaningperiod