Cargando…
A Systematic Review on Healthcare Artificial Intelligent Conversational Agents for Chronic Conditions
This paper reviews different types of conversational agents used in health care for chronic conditions, examining their underlying communication technology, evaluation measures, and AI methods. A systematic search was performed in February 2021 on PubMed Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Sci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35408238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072625 |
_version_ | 1784686091551375360 |
---|---|
author | Bin Sawad, Abdullah Narayan, Bhuva Alnefaie, Ahlam Maqbool, Ashwaq Mckie, Indra Smith, Jemma Yuksel, Berkan Puthal, Deepak Prasad, Mukesh Kocaballi, A. Baki |
author_facet | Bin Sawad, Abdullah Narayan, Bhuva Alnefaie, Ahlam Maqbool, Ashwaq Mckie, Indra Smith, Jemma Yuksel, Berkan Puthal, Deepak Prasad, Mukesh Kocaballi, A. Baki |
author_sort | Bin Sawad, Abdullah |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper reviews different types of conversational agents used in health care for chronic conditions, examining their underlying communication technology, evaluation measures, and AI methods. A systematic search was performed in February 2021 on PubMed Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ACM Digital Library. Studies were included if they focused on consumers, caregivers, or healthcare professionals in the prevention, treatment, or rehabilitation of chronic diseases, involved conversational agents, and tested the system with human users. The search retrieved 1087 articles. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Out of 26 conversational agents (CAs), 16 were chatbots, seven were embodied conversational agents (ECA), one was a conversational agent in a robot, and another was a relational agent. One agent was not specified. Based on this review, the overall acceptance of CAs by users for the self-management of their chronic conditions is promising. Users’ feedback shows helpfulness, satisfaction, and ease of use in more than half of included studies. Although many users in the studies appear to feel more comfortable with CAs, there is still a lack of reliable and comparable evidence to determine the efficacy of AI-enabled CAs for chronic health conditions due to the insufficient reporting of technical implementation details. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9003264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90032642022-04-13 A Systematic Review on Healthcare Artificial Intelligent Conversational Agents for Chronic Conditions Bin Sawad, Abdullah Narayan, Bhuva Alnefaie, Ahlam Maqbool, Ashwaq Mckie, Indra Smith, Jemma Yuksel, Berkan Puthal, Deepak Prasad, Mukesh Kocaballi, A. Baki Sensors (Basel) Systematic Review This paper reviews different types of conversational agents used in health care for chronic conditions, examining their underlying communication technology, evaluation measures, and AI methods. A systematic search was performed in February 2021 on PubMed Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ACM Digital Library. Studies were included if they focused on consumers, caregivers, or healthcare professionals in the prevention, treatment, or rehabilitation of chronic diseases, involved conversational agents, and tested the system with human users. The search retrieved 1087 articles. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Out of 26 conversational agents (CAs), 16 were chatbots, seven were embodied conversational agents (ECA), one was a conversational agent in a robot, and another was a relational agent. One agent was not specified. Based on this review, the overall acceptance of CAs by users for the self-management of their chronic conditions is promising. Users’ feedback shows helpfulness, satisfaction, and ease of use in more than half of included studies. Although many users in the studies appear to feel more comfortable with CAs, there is still a lack of reliable and comparable evidence to determine the efficacy of AI-enabled CAs for chronic health conditions due to the insufficient reporting of technical implementation details. MDPI 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9003264/ /pubmed/35408238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072625 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Bin Sawad, Abdullah Narayan, Bhuva Alnefaie, Ahlam Maqbool, Ashwaq Mckie, Indra Smith, Jemma Yuksel, Berkan Puthal, Deepak Prasad, Mukesh Kocaballi, A. Baki A Systematic Review on Healthcare Artificial Intelligent Conversational Agents for Chronic Conditions |
title | A Systematic Review on Healthcare Artificial Intelligent Conversational Agents for Chronic Conditions |
title_full | A Systematic Review on Healthcare Artificial Intelligent Conversational Agents for Chronic Conditions |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review on Healthcare Artificial Intelligent Conversational Agents for Chronic Conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review on Healthcare Artificial Intelligent Conversational Agents for Chronic Conditions |
title_short | A Systematic Review on Healthcare Artificial Intelligent Conversational Agents for Chronic Conditions |
title_sort | systematic review on healthcare artificial intelligent conversational agents for chronic conditions |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35408238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072625 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT binsawadabdullah asystematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT narayanbhuva asystematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT alnefaieahlam asystematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT maqboolashwaq asystematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT mckieindra asystematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT smithjemma asystematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT yukselberkan asystematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT puthaldeepak asystematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT prasadmukesh asystematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT kocaballiabaki asystematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT binsawadabdullah systematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT narayanbhuva systematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT alnefaieahlam systematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT maqboolashwaq systematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT mckieindra systematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT smithjemma systematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT yukselberkan systematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT puthaldeepak systematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT prasadmukesh systematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions AT kocaballiabaki systematicreviewonhealthcareartificialintelligentconversationalagentsforchronicconditions |