Cargando…
Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods
Linear dependence of variables is a commonly used assumption in most diagnostic systems for which many robust methodologies have been developed over the years. In case the system nonlinearities are relevant, fault diagnosis methods, relying on the assumption of linearity, might potentially provide u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35408249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072635 |
_version_ | 1784686139518484480 |
---|---|
author | Cartocci, Nicholas Napolitano, Marcello R. Crocetti, Francesco Costante, Gabriele Valigi, Paolo Fravolini, Mario L. |
author_facet | Cartocci, Nicholas Napolitano, Marcello R. Crocetti, Francesco Costante, Gabriele Valigi, Paolo Fravolini, Mario L. |
author_sort | Cartocci, Nicholas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Linear dependence of variables is a commonly used assumption in most diagnostic systems for which many robust methodologies have been developed over the years. In case the system nonlinearities are relevant, fault diagnosis methods, relying on the assumption of linearity, might potentially provide unsatisfactory results in terms of false alarms and missed detections. In recent years, many authors have proposed machine learning (ML) techniques to improve fault diagnosis performance to mitigate this problem. Although very powerful, these techniques require faulty data samples that are representative of any fault scenario. Additionally, ML techniques suffer from issues related to overfitting and unpredictable performance in regions which are not fully explored in the training phase. This paper proposes a non-linear additive model to characterize the non-linear redundancy relationships among the system signals. Using the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) algorithm, these relationships are identified directly from the data. Next, the non-linear redundancy relationships are linearized to derive a local time-dependent fault signature matrix. The faulty sensor can then be isolated by measuring the angular distance between the column vectors of the fault signature matrix and the primary residual vector. A quantitative analysis of fault isolation and fault estimation performance is performed by exploiting real data from multiple flights of a semi-autonomous aircraft, thus allowing a detailed quantitative comparison with state-of-the-art machine-learning-based fault diagnosis algorithms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9003460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90034602022-04-13 Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods Cartocci, Nicholas Napolitano, Marcello R. Crocetti, Francesco Costante, Gabriele Valigi, Paolo Fravolini, Mario L. Sensors (Basel) Article Linear dependence of variables is a commonly used assumption in most diagnostic systems for which many robust methodologies have been developed over the years. In case the system nonlinearities are relevant, fault diagnosis methods, relying on the assumption of linearity, might potentially provide unsatisfactory results in terms of false alarms and missed detections. In recent years, many authors have proposed machine learning (ML) techniques to improve fault diagnosis performance to mitigate this problem. Although very powerful, these techniques require faulty data samples that are representative of any fault scenario. Additionally, ML techniques suffer from issues related to overfitting and unpredictable performance in regions which are not fully explored in the training phase. This paper proposes a non-linear additive model to characterize the non-linear redundancy relationships among the system signals. Using the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) algorithm, these relationships are identified directly from the data. Next, the non-linear redundancy relationships are linearized to derive a local time-dependent fault signature matrix. The faulty sensor can then be isolated by measuring the angular distance between the column vectors of the fault signature matrix and the primary residual vector. A quantitative analysis of fault isolation and fault estimation performance is performed by exploiting real data from multiple flights of a semi-autonomous aircraft, thus allowing a detailed quantitative comparison with state-of-the-art machine-learning-based fault diagnosis algorithms. MDPI 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9003460/ /pubmed/35408249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072635 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Cartocci, Nicholas Napolitano, Marcello R. Crocetti, Francesco Costante, Gabriele Valigi, Paolo Fravolini, Mario L. Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods |
title | Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods |
title_full | Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods |
title_fullStr | Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods |
title_short | Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods |
title_sort | data-driven fault diagnosis techniques: non-linear directional residual vs. machine-learning-based methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35408249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072635 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cartoccinicholas datadrivenfaultdiagnosistechniquesnonlineardirectionalresidualvsmachinelearningbasedmethods AT napolitanomarcellor datadrivenfaultdiagnosistechniquesnonlineardirectionalresidualvsmachinelearningbasedmethods AT crocettifrancesco datadrivenfaultdiagnosistechniquesnonlineardirectionalresidualvsmachinelearningbasedmethods AT costantegabriele datadrivenfaultdiagnosistechniquesnonlineardirectionalresidualvsmachinelearningbasedmethods AT valigipaolo datadrivenfaultdiagnosistechniquesnonlineardirectionalresidualvsmachinelearningbasedmethods AT fravolinimariol datadrivenfaultdiagnosistechniquesnonlineardirectionalresidualvsmachinelearningbasedmethods |