Cargando…

Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods

Linear dependence of variables is a commonly used assumption in most diagnostic systems for which many robust methodologies have been developed over the years. In case the system nonlinearities are relevant, fault diagnosis methods, relying on the assumption of linearity, might potentially provide u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cartocci, Nicholas, Napolitano, Marcello R., Crocetti, Francesco, Costante, Gabriele, Valigi, Paolo, Fravolini, Mario L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35408249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072635
_version_ 1784686139518484480
author Cartocci, Nicholas
Napolitano, Marcello R.
Crocetti, Francesco
Costante, Gabriele
Valigi, Paolo
Fravolini, Mario L.
author_facet Cartocci, Nicholas
Napolitano, Marcello R.
Crocetti, Francesco
Costante, Gabriele
Valigi, Paolo
Fravolini, Mario L.
author_sort Cartocci, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description Linear dependence of variables is a commonly used assumption in most diagnostic systems for which many robust methodologies have been developed over the years. In case the system nonlinearities are relevant, fault diagnosis methods, relying on the assumption of linearity, might potentially provide unsatisfactory results in terms of false alarms and missed detections. In recent years, many authors have proposed machine learning (ML) techniques to improve fault diagnosis performance to mitigate this problem. Although very powerful, these techniques require faulty data samples that are representative of any fault scenario. Additionally, ML techniques suffer from issues related to overfitting and unpredictable performance in regions which are not fully explored in the training phase. This paper proposes a non-linear additive model to characterize the non-linear redundancy relationships among the system signals. Using the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) algorithm, these relationships are identified directly from the data. Next, the non-linear redundancy relationships are linearized to derive a local time-dependent fault signature matrix. The faulty sensor can then be isolated by measuring the angular distance between the column vectors of the fault signature matrix and the primary residual vector. A quantitative analysis of fault isolation and fault estimation performance is performed by exploiting real data from multiple flights of a semi-autonomous aircraft, thus allowing a detailed quantitative comparison with state-of-the-art machine-learning-based fault diagnosis algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9003460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90034602022-04-13 Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods Cartocci, Nicholas Napolitano, Marcello R. Crocetti, Francesco Costante, Gabriele Valigi, Paolo Fravolini, Mario L. Sensors (Basel) Article Linear dependence of variables is a commonly used assumption in most diagnostic systems for which many robust methodologies have been developed over the years. In case the system nonlinearities are relevant, fault diagnosis methods, relying on the assumption of linearity, might potentially provide unsatisfactory results in terms of false alarms and missed detections. In recent years, many authors have proposed machine learning (ML) techniques to improve fault diagnosis performance to mitigate this problem. Although very powerful, these techniques require faulty data samples that are representative of any fault scenario. Additionally, ML techniques suffer from issues related to overfitting and unpredictable performance in regions which are not fully explored in the training phase. This paper proposes a non-linear additive model to characterize the non-linear redundancy relationships among the system signals. Using the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) algorithm, these relationships are identified directly from the data. Next, the non-linear redundancy relationships are linearized to derive a local time-dependent fault signature matrix. The faulty sensor can then be isolated by measuring the angular distance between the column vectors of the fault signature matrix and the primary residual vector. A quantitative analysis of fault isolation and fault estimation performance is performed by exploiting real data from multiple flights of a semi-autonomous aircraft, thus allowing a detailed quantitative comparison with state-of-the-art machine-learning-based fault diagnosis algorithms. MDPI 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9003460/ /pubmed/35408249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072635 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cartocci, Nicholas
Napolitano, Marcello R.
Crocetti, Francesco
Costante, Gabriele
Valigi, Paolo
Fravolini, Mario L.
Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods
title Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods
title_full Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods
title_fullStr Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods
title_full_unstemmed Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods
title_short Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Non-Linear Directional Residual vs. Machine-Learning-Based Methods
title_sort data-driven fault diagnosis techniques: non-linear directional residual vs. machine-learning-based methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35408249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22072635
work_keys_str_mv AT cartoccinicholas datadrivenfaultdiagnosistechniquesnonlineardirectionalresidualvsmachinelearningbasedmethods
AT napolitanomarcellor datadrivenfaultdiagnosistechniquesnonlineardirectionalresidualvsmachinelearningbasedmethods
AT crocettifrancesco datadrivenfaultdiagnosistechniquesnonlineardirectionalresidualvsmachinelearningbasedmethods
AT costantegabriele datadrivenfaultdiagnosistechniquesnonlineardirectionalresidualvsmachinelearningbasedmethods
AT valigipaolo datadrivenfaultdiagnosistechniquesnonlineardirectionalresidualvsmachinelearningbasedmethods
AT fravolinimariol datadrivenfaultdiagnosistechniquesnonlineardirectionalresidualvsmachinelearningbasedmethods