Cargando…

Single use versus reusable catheters in intermittent catheterisation for treatment of urinary retention: a protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial (COMPaRE)

INTRODUCTION: Chronic urinary retention is a common lower urinary tract disorder, mostly neurogenic or idiopathic in origin. The preferred treatment is clean intermittent urinary self-catheterisation (CISC) four to six times a day. In most European countries, virtually all patients use single use ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Doorn, Tess, Berendsen, Sophie A, Scheepe, Jeroen R, Blok, Bertil F M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056649
_version_ 1784686169957597184
author van Doorn, Tess
Berendsen, Sophie A
Scheepe, Jeroen R
Blok, Bertil F M
author_facet van Doorn, Tess
Berendsen, Sophie A
Scheepe, Jeroen R
Blok, Bertil F M
author_sort van Doorn, Tess
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chronic urinary retention is a common lower urinary tract disorder, mostly neurogenic or idiopathic in origin. The preferred treatment is clean intermittent urinary self-catheterisation (CISC) four to six times a day. In most European countries, virtually all patients use single use catheters, which is in contrast to several countries where the use of reusable catheters is more common. The available literature on the use of reusable catheters is conflicting and until now, no randomised controlled trial with sufficient power has been performed to investigate if reusable catheters for CISC is as safe as single use catheters. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We described this protocol for a prospective, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to investigate if the use of reusable catheters is as safe as single use catheters for CISC patients, measured by symptomatic urinary tract infections (sUTIs). Secondary objectives are adverse events due to a sUTI, urethral damage, stone formation, quality of life and patient satisfaction. A cost-effectiveness analysis will also be performed. 456 Participants will be randomised into two groups stratified for age, gender, menopausal status and (non-)neurogenic underlying disorder. The intervention group will replace the reusable catheter set every 2 weeks for a new set and replace the cleaning solution every 24 hours. The control group continues to use its own catheters. The primary outcome (amount of sUTIs from baseline to 1 year) will be tested for non-inferiority. Categorical outcome measures will be analysed using χ(2) tests and quantitative outcome variables by t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests. Two-sided p values will be calculated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus MC (MEC 2019-0134) and will be performed according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) checklist for non-inferiority trials. The results of this randomised controlled non-inferiority trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be publicly available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL8296.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9003620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90036202022-04-27 Single use versus reusable catheters in intermittent catheterisation for treatment of urinary retention: a protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial (COMPaRE) van Doorn, Tess Berendsen, Sophie A Scheepe, Jeroen R Blok, Bertil F M BMJ Open Urology INTRODUCTION: Chronic urinary retention is a common lower urinary tract disorder, mostly neurogenic or idiopathic in origin. The preferred treatment is clean intermittent urinary self-catheterisation (CISC) four to six times a day. In most European countries, virtually all patients use single use catheters, which is in contrast to several countries where the use of reusable catheters is more common. The available literature on the use of reusable catheters is conflicting and until now, no randomised controlled trial with sufficient power has been performed to investigate if reusable catheters for CISC is as safe as single use catheters. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We described this protocol for a prospective, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to investigate if the use of reusable catheters is as safe as single use catheters for CISC patients, measured by symptomatic urinary tract infections (sUTIs). Secondary objectives are adverse events due to a sUTI, urethral damage, stone formation, quality of life and patient satisfaction. A cost-effectiveness analysis will also be performed. 456 Participants will be randomised into two groups stratified for age, gender, menopausal status and (non-)neurogenic underlying disorder. The intervention group will replace the reusable catheter set every 2 weeks for a new set and replace the cleaning solution every 24 hours. The control group continues to use its own catheters. The primary outcome (amount of sUTIs from baseline to 1 year) will be tested for non-inferiority. Categorical outcome measures will be analysed using χ(2) tests and quantitative outcome variables by t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests. Two-sided p values will be calculated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus MC (MEC 2019-0134) and will be performed according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) checklist for non-inferiority trials. The results of this randomised controlled non-inferiority trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be publicly available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL8296. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9003620/ /pubmed/35410930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056649 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Urology
van Doorn, Tess
Berendsen, Sophie A
Scheepe, Jeroen R
Blok, Bertil F M
Single use versus reusable catheters in intermittent catheterisation for treatment of urinary retention: a protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial (COMPaRE)
title Single use versus reusable catheters in intermittent catheterisation for treatment of urinary retention: a protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial (COMPaRE)
title_full Single use versus reusable catheters in intermittent catheterisation for treatment of urinary retention: a protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial (COMPaRE)
title_fullStr Single use versus reusable catheters in intermittent catheterisation for treatment of urinary retention: a protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial (COMPaRE)
title_full_unstemmed Single use versus reusable catheters in intermittent catheterisation for treatment of urinary retention: a protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial (COMPaRE)
title_short Single use versus reusable catheters in intermittent catheterisation for treatment of urinary retention: a protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial (COMPaRE)
title_sort single use versus reusable catheters in intermittent catheterisation for treatment of urinary retention: a protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial (compare)
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056649
work_keys_str_mv AT vandoorntess singleuseversusreusablecathetersinintermittentcatheterisationfortreatmentofurinaryretentionaprotocolforamulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialcompare
AT berendsensophiea singleuseversusreusablecathetersinintermittentcatheterisationfortreatmentofurinaryretentionaprotocolforamulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialcompare
AT scheepejeroenr singleuseversusreusablecathetersinintermittentcatheterisationfortreatmentofurinaryretentionaprotocolforamulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialcompare
AT blokbertilfm singleuseversusreusablecathetersinintermittentcatheterisationfortreatmentofurinaryretentionaprotocolforamulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialcompare