Cargando…

Efficacy comparison of trifocal bone transport using unilateral external fixator for femoral and tibial bone defects caused by infection

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of patients with femoral and tibial critical-sized bone defect (CSBD) treated by trifocal bone transport using the Ilizarov method. METHODS: From March 2011 and January 2017, clinical and radiographic data of patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Kai, Liu, Yanshi, Cai, Feiyu, Fan, Chenchen, Ren, Peng, Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9004006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01586-z
_version_ 1784686199586160640
author Liu, Kai
Liu, Yanshi
Cai, Feiyu
Fan, Chenchen
Ren, Peng
Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang
author_facet Liu, Kai
Liu, Yanshi
Cai, Feiyu
Fan, Chenchen
Ren, Peng
Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang
author_sort Liu, Kai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of patients with femoral and tibial critical-sized bone defect (CSBD) treated by trifocal bone transport using the Ilizarov method. METHODS: From March 2011 and January 2017, clinical and radiographic data of patients with CSBD (> 6 cm) caused by infection were documented and analyzed. Patients were divided into the femur group (n = 18) and tibia groups (n = 21) according to the location of bone transport. The bone and functional outcomes were evaluated according to the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of the Ilizarov (ASAMI) criterion, and postoperative complications were evaluated by Paley classification. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were managed by the trifocal bone transport for the femur (n = 18) or tibia (n = 21) bone defects with a mean follow-up time of 26.1 months (range 17–34 months). Eighteen femurs and 21 tibias with a mean distraction regenerate length (DRL) of 8.3 cm (range 6–13 cm) and 7.5 cm (range 6–11 cm) respectively. Infection was eradicated in all patients, and the total bone union was received in all cases (100%). Statistical difference of bone grade (excellent/good/fair/poor, 3/11/3/1 vs 2/13/4/2, P < 0.05), and function grade (excellent/good/fair/poor, 3/14/1/0 vs 4/13/3/1, P < 0.05) were respectively observed between the femur group and tibia group. The excellent and good rate of bone (femur vs tibia, 77.8% vs 71.4%), and function grade (femur vs tibia, 94.4% vs 80.9%) was higher in the femur group than the tibia. The rate of complication in the femur group was lower than in the tibia (femur vs tibia, 94.4% vs 76.2%). One femur and five tibias were performed additional surgery for delayed union and axial deviation. CONCLUSIONS: The trifocal bone transport using the unilateral external fixator was a practical method in the management of CSBD in the lower extremity. The BUT and EFI of the femur group were shorter than the tibia. Although the complications noted were more frequent on the femur, these were mostly minor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9004006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90040062022-04-13 Efficacy comparison of trifocal bone transport using unilateral external fixator for femoral and tibial bone defects caused by infection Liu, Kai Liu, Yanshi Cai, Feiyu Fan, Chenchen Ren, Peng Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of patients with femoral and tibial critical-sized bone defect (CSBD) treated by trifocal bone transport using the Ilizarov method. METHODS: From March 2011 and January 2017, clinical and radiographic data of patients with CSBD (> 6 cm) caused by infection were documented and analyzed. Patients were divided into the femur group (n = 18) and tibia groups (n = 21) according to the location of bone transport. The bone and functional outcomes were evaluated according to the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of the Ilizarov (ASAMI) criterion, and postoperative complications were evaluated by Paley classification. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were managed by the trifocal bone transport for the femur (n = 18) or tibia (n = 21) bone defects with a mean follow-up time of 26.1 months (range 17–34 months). Eighteen femurs and 21 tibias with a mean distraction regenerate length (DRL) of 8.3 cm (range 6–13 cm) and 7.5 cm (range 6–11 cm) respectively. Infection was eradicated in all patients, and the total bone union was received in all cases (100%). Statistical difference of bone grade (excellent/good/fair/poor, 3/11/3/1 vs 2/13/4/2, P < 0.05), and function grade (excellent/good/fair/poor, 3/14/1/0 vs 4/13/3/1, P < 0.05) were respectively observed between the femur group and tibia group. The excellent and good rate of bone (femur vs tibia, 77.8% vs 71.4%), and function grade (femur vs tibia, 94.4% vs 80.9%) was higher in the femur group than the tibia. The rate of complication in the femur group was lower than in the tibia (femur vs tibia, 94.4% vs 76.2%). One femur and five tibias were performed additional surgery for delayed union and axial deviation. CONCLUSIONS: The trifocal bone transport using the unilateral external fixator was a practical method in the management of CSBD in the lower extremity. The BUT and EFI of the femur group were shorter than the tibia. Although the complications noted were more frequent on the femur, these were mostly minor. BioMed Central 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9004006/ /pubmed/35413897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01586-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Kai
Liu, Yanshi
Cai, Feiyu
Fan, Chenchen
Ren, Peng
Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang
Efficacy comparison of trifocal bone transport using unilateral external fixator for femoral and tibial bone defects caused by infection
title Efficacy comparison of trifocal bone transport using unilateral external fixator for femoral and tibial bone defects caused by infection
title_full Efficacy comparison of trifocal bone transport using unilateral external fixator for femoral and tibial bone defects caused by infection
title_fullStr Efficacy comparison of trifocal bone transport using unilateral external fixator for femoral and tibial bone defects caused by infection
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy comparison of trifocal bone transport using unilateral external fixator for femoral and tibial bone defects caused by infection
title_short Efficacy comparison of trifocal bone transport using unilateral external fixator for femoral and tibial bone defects caused by infection
title_sort efficacy comparison of trifocal bone transport using unilateral external fixator for femoral and tibial bone defects caused by infection
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9004006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01586-z
work_keys_str_mv AT liukai efficacycomparisonoftrifocalbonetransportusingunilateralexternalfixatorforfemoralandtibialbonedefectscausedbyinfection
AT liuyanshi efficacycomparisonoftrifocalbonetransportusingunilateralexternalfixatorforfemoralandtibialbonedefectscausedbyinfection
AT caifeiyu efficacycomparisonoftrifocalbonetransportusingunilateralexternalfixatorforfemoralandtibialbonedefectscausedbyinfection
AT fanchenchen efficacycomparisonoftrifocalbonetransportusingunilateralexternalfixatorforfemoralandtibialbonedefectscausedbyinfection
AT renpeng efficacycomparisonoftrifocalbonetransportusingunilateralexternalfixatorforfemoralandtibialbonedefectscausedbyinfection
AT yusufuaihemaitijiang efficacycomparisonoftrifocalbonetransportusingunilateralexternalfixatorforfemoralandtibialbonedefectscausedbyinfection