Cargando…
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Form: Dutch norms and validity
OBJECTIVE: This study provides Dutch national norms for the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children aged 3-14 years, and assesses the test performance of the SDQ Total Difficulties Scale (TDS) and impairment Scale. We further compared Dutch SDQ norms with those of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9004049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03274-6 |
_version_ | 1784686208186580992 |
---|---|
author | Theunissen, Meinou H. C. de Wolff, Marianne S. Eekhout, Iris Mieloo, Cathelijne L. Stone, Lisanne L. Reijneveld, Sijmen A. |
author_facet | Theunissen, Meinou H. C. de Wolff, Marianne S. Eekhout, Iris Mieloo, Cathelijne L. Stone, Lisanne L. Reijneveld, Sijmen A. |
author_sort | Theunissen, Meinou H. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study provides Dutch national norms for the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children aged 3-14 years, and assesses the test performance of the SDQ Total Difficulties Scale (TDS) and impairment Scale. We further compared Dutch SDQ norms with those of the United Kingdom (UK), to determine potential variation in country-specific norms. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed data of 3384 children aged 3 to 14 years. The data were obtained in schools, and in the context of Preventive Child Healthcare. Parents completed the SDQ parent form and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). We determined clinical (10% elevated scores) and borderline (20% elevated scores) SDQ TDS norms. We assessed the test performance (validity) of the SDQ TDS and Impairment Score using the CBCL as criterion. RESULTS: The clinical SDQ TDS norms varied between > 10 and > 14 depending on the age group. The SDQ TDS discriminated between children with and without problems, as measured by the CBCL, for all age groups (AUCs varied from 0.92 to 0.96). The SDQ Impairment Score had added value (beyond the SDQ TDS) only for the age group 12-14 years. For the Netherlands we found lower clinical SDQ TDS norms than those previously reported for the UK (i.e. > 16). CONCLUSION: The clinical SDQ TDS norms varied between > 10 and > 14 depending on the age groups. We found good test performance at these proposed norms. Dutch norms differed somewhat from UK norms. In the Netherlands, the SDQ performed better with Dutch-specific norms than with UK-specific norms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9004049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90040492022-04-13 The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Form: Dutch norms and validity Theunissen, Meinou H. C. de Wolff, Marianne S. Eekhout, Iris Mieloo, Cathelijne L. Stone, Lisanne L. Reijneveld, Sijmen A. BMC Pediatr Research OBJECTIVE: This study provides Dutch national norms for the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children aged 3-14 years, and assesses the test performance of the SDQ Total Difficulties Scale (TDS) and impairment Scale. We further compared Dutch SDQ norms with those of the United Kingdom (UK), to determine potential variation in country-specific norms. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed data of 3384 children aged 3 to 14 years. The data were obtained in schools, and in the context of Preventive Child Healthcare. Parents completed the SDQ parent form and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). We determined clinical (10% elevated scores) and borderline (20% elevated scores) SDQ TDS norms. We assessed the test performance (validity) of the SDQ TDS and Impairment Score using the CBCL as criterion. RESULTS: The clinical SDQ TDS norms varied between > 10 and > 14 depending on the age group. The SDQ TDS discriminated between children with and without problems, as measured by the CBCL, for all age groups (AUCs varied from 0.92 to 0.96). The SDQ Impairment Score had added value (beyond the SDQ TDS) only for the age group 12-14 years. For the Netherlands we found lower clinical SDQ TDS norms than those previously reported for the UK (i.e. > 16). CONCLUSION: The clinical SDQ TDS norms varied between > 10 and > 14 depending on the age groups. We found good test performance at these proposed norms. Dutch norms differed somewhat from UK norms. In the Netherlands, the SDQ performed better with Dutch-specific norms than with UK-specific norms. BioMed Central 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9004049/ /pubmed/35413892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03274-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Theunissen, Meinou H. C. de Wolff, Marianne S. Eekhout, Iris Mieloo, Cathelijne L. Stone, Lisanne L. Reijneveld, Sijmen A. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Form: Dutch norms and validity |
title | The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Form: Dutch norms and validity |
title_full | The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Form: Dutch norms and validity |
title_fullStr | The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Form: Dutch norms and validity |
title_full_unstemmed | The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Form: Dutch norms and validity |
title_short | The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Form: Dutch norms and validity |
title_sort | strengths and difficulties questionnaire parent form: dutch norms and validity |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9004049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03274-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT theunissenmeinouhc thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireparentformdutchnormsandvalidity AT dewolffmariannes thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireparentformdutchnormsandvalidity AT eekhoutiris thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireparentformdutchnormsandvalidity AT mieloocathelijnel thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireparentformdutchnormsandvalidity AT stonelisannel thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireparentformdutchnormsandvalidity AT reijneveldsijmena thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireparentformdutchnormsandvalidity AT theunissenmeinouhc strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireparentformdutchnormsandvalidity AT dewolffmariannes strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireparentformdutchnormsandvalidity AT eekhoutiris strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireparentformdutchnormsandvalidity AT mieloocathelijnel strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireparentformdutchnormsandvalidity AT stonelisannel strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireparentformdutchnormsandvalidity AT reijneveldsijmena strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireparentformdutchnormsandvalidity |