Cargando…
Multi-trait genomic prediction using in-season physiological parameters increases prediction accuracy of complex traits in US wheat
BACKGROUND: Recently genomic selection (GS) has emerged as an important tool for plant breeders to select superior genotypes. Multi-trait (MT) prediction model provides an opportunity to improve the predictive ability of expensive and labor-intensive traits. In this study, we assessed the potential...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9004054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08487-8 |
_version_ | 1784686209424949248 |
---|---|
author | Shahi, Dipendra Guo, Jia Pradhan, Sumit Khan, Jahangir AVCI, Muhsin Khan, Naeem McBreen, Jordan Bai, Guihua Reynolds, Matthew Foulkes, John Babar, Md Ali |
author_facet | Shahi, Dipendra Guo, Jia Pradhan, Sumit Khan, Jahangir AVCI, Muhsin Khan, Naeem McBreen, Jordan Bai, Guihua Reynolds, Matthew Foulkes, John Babar, Md Ali |
author_sort | Shahi, Dipendra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently genomic selection (GS) has emerged as an important tool for plant breeders to select superior genotypes. Multi-trait (MT) prediction model provides an opportunity to improve the predictive ability of expensive and labor-intensive traits. In this study, we assessed the potential use of a MT genomic prediction model by incorporating two physiological traits (canopy temperature, CT and normalized difference vegetation index, NDVI) to predict 5 complex primary traits (harvest index, HI; grain yield, GY; grain number, GN; spike partitioning index, SPI; fruiting efiiciency, FE) using two cross-validation schemes CV1 and CV2. RESULTS: In this study, we evaluated 236 wheat genotypes in two locations in 2 years. The wheat genotypes were genotyped with genotyping by sequencing approach which generated 27,466 SNPs. MT-CV2 (multi-trait cross validation 2) model improved predictive ability by 4.8 to 138.5% compared to ST-CV1(single-trait cross validation 1). However, the predictive ability of MT-CV1 was not significantly different compared to the ST-CV1 model. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that the genomic prediction of complex traits such as HI, GN, and GY can be improved when correlated secondary traits (cheaper and easier phenotyping) are used. MT genomic selection could accelerate breeding cycles and improve genetic gain for complex traits in wheat and other crops. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-08487-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9004054 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90040542022-04-13 Multi-trait genomic prediction using in-season physiological parameters increases prediction accuracy of complex traits in US wheat Shahi, Dipendra Guo, Jia Pradhan, Sumit Khan, Jahangir AVCI, Muhsin Khan, Naeem McBreen, Jordan Bai, Guihua Reynolds, Matthew Foulkes, John Babar, Md Ali BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: Recently genomic selection (GS) has emerged as an important tool for plant breeders to select superior genotypes. Multi-trait (MT) prediction model provides an opportunity to improve the predictive ability of expensive and labor-intensive traits. In this study, we assessed the potential use of a MT genomic prediction model by incorporating two physiological traits (canopy temperature, CT and normalized difference vegetation index, NDVI) to predict 5 complex primary traits (harvest index, HI; grain yield, GY; grain number, GN; spike partitioning index, SPI; fruiting efiiciency, FE) using two cross-validation schemes CV1 and CV2. RESULTS: In this study, we evaluated 236 wheat genotypes in two locations in 2 years. The wheat genotypes were genotyped with genotyping by sequencing approach which generated 27,466 SNPs. MT-CV2 (multi-trait cross validation 2) model improved predictive ability by 4.8 to 138.5% compared to ST-CV1(single-trait cross validation 1). However, the predictive ability of MT-CV1 was not significantly different compared to the ST-CV1 model. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that the genomic prediction of complex traits such as HI, GN, and GY can be improved when correlated secondary traits (cheaper and easier phenotyping) are used. MT genomic selection could accelerate breeding cycles and improve genetic gain for complex traits in wheat and other crops. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-08487-8. BioMed Central 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9004054/ /pubmed/35413795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08487-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Shahi, Dipendra Guo, Jia Pradhan, Sumit Khan, Jahangir AVCI, Muhsin Khan, Naeem McBreen, Jordan Bai, Guihua Reynolds, Matthew Foulkes, John Babar, Md Ali Multi-trait genomic prediction using in-season physiological parameters increases prediction accuracy of complex traits in US wheat |
title | Multi-trait genomic prediction using in-season physiological parameters increases prediction accuracy of complex traits in US wheat |
title_full | Multi-trait genomic prediction using in-season physiological parameters increases prediction accuracy of complex traits in US wheat |
title_fullStr | Multi-trait genomic prediction using in-season physiological parameters increases prediction accuracy of complex traits in US wheat |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-trait genomic prediction using in-season physiological parameters increases prediction accuracy of complex traits in US wheat |
title_short | Multi-trait genomic prediction using in-season physiological parameters increases prediction accuracy of complex traits in US wheat |
title_sort | multi-trait genomic prediction using in-season physiological parameters increases prediction accuracy of complex traits in us wheat |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9004054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08487-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahidipendra multitraitgenomicpredictionusinginseasonphysiologicalparametersincreasespredictionaccuracyofcomplextraitsinuswheat AT guojia multitraitgenomicpredictionusinginseasonphysiologicalparametersincreasespredictionaccuracyofcomplextraitsinuswheat AT pradhansumit multitraitgenomicpredictionusinginseasonphysiologicalparametersincreasespredictionaccuracyofcomplextraitsinuswheat AT khanjahangir multitraitgenomicpredictionusinginseasonphysiologicalparametersincreasespredictionaccuracyofcomplextraitsinuswheat AT avcimuhsin multitraitgenomicpredictionusinginseasonphysiologicalparametersincreasespredictionaccuracyofcomplextraitsinuswheat AT khannaeem multitraitgenomicpredictionusinginseasonphysiologicalparametersincreasespredictionaccuracyofcomplextraitsinuswheat AT mcbreenjordan multitraitgenomicpredictionusinginseasonphysiologicalparametersincreasespredictionaccuracyofcomplextraitsinuswheat AT baiguihua multitraitgenomicpredictionusinginseasonphysiologicalparametersincreasespredictionaccuracyofcomplextraitsinuswheat AT reynoldsmatthew multitraitgenomicpredictionusinginseasonphysiologicalparametersincreasespredictionaccuracyofcomplextraitsinuswheat AT foulkesjohn multitraitgenomicpredictionusinginseasonphysiologicalparametersincreasespredictionaccuracyofcomplextraitsinuswheat AT babarmdali multitraitgenomicpredictionusinginseasonphysiologicalparametersincreasespredictionaccuracyofcomplextraitsinuswheat |