Cargando…
Standard rectal swabs as a surrogate sample for gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of routinely available rectal swabs as a surrogate sample type for testing the gut microbiome and monitoring antibiotic effects on key gut microorganisms, of patients hospitalised in an intensive care unit. A metagenomic whole genome s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9004175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02487-0 |
_version_ | 1784686234027687936 |
---|---|
author | Schlebusch, Sanmarié Graham, Rikki M. A. Jennison, Amy V. Lassig-Smith, Melissa M. Harris, Patrick N. A. Lipman, Jeffrey Ó Cuív, Páraic Paterson, David L. |
author_facet | Schlebusch, Sanmarié Graham, Rikki M. A. Jennison, Amy V. Lassig-Smith, Melissa M. Harris, Patrick N. A. Lipman, Jeffrey Ó Cuív, Páraic Paterson, David L. |
author_sort | Schlebusch, Sanmarié |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of routinely available rectal swabs as a surrogate sample type for testing the gut microbiome and monitoring antibiotic effects on key gut microorganisms, of patients hospitalised in an intensive care unit. A metagenomic whole genome sequencing approach was undertaken to determine the diversity of organisms as well as resistance genes and to compare findings between the two sampling techniques. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in overall diversity between the faeces and rectal swabs and sampling technique was not demonstrated to predict microbial community variation. More human DNA was present in the swabs and some differences were observed only for a select few anaerobes and bacteria also associated with skin and/or the female genitourinary system, possibly reflecting sampling site or technique. Antibiotics and collections at different times of admission were both considered significant influences on microbial community composition alteration. Detection of antibiotic resistance genes between rectal swabs and faeces were overall not significantly different, although some variations were detected with a potential association with the number of human sequence reads in a sample. CONCLUSION: Testing the gut microbiome using standard rectal swab collection techniques currently used for multi-resistant organism screening has been demonstrated to have utility in gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care. The use of information from this article, in terms of methodology as well as near equivalence demonstrated between rectal swabs and faeces will be able to support and potentially facilitate the introduction into clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-022-02487-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9004175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90041752022-04-13 Standard rectal swabs as a surrogate sample for gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care Schlebusch, Sanmarié Graham, Rikki M. A. Jennison, Amy V. Lassig-Smith, Melissa M. Harris, Patrick N. A. Lipman, Jeffrey Ó Cuív, Páraic Paterson, David L. BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of routinely available rectal swabs as a surrogate sample type for testing the gut microbiome and monitoring antibiotic effects on key gut microorganisms, of patients hospitalised in an intensive care unit. A metagenomic whole genome sequencing approach was undertaken to determine the diversity of organisms as well as resistance genes and to compare findings between the two sampling techniques. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in overall diversity between the faeces and rectal swabs and sampling technique was not demonstrated to predict microbial community variation. More human DNA was present in the swabs and some differences were observed only for a select few anaerobes and bacteria also associated with skin and/or the female genitourinary system, possibly reflecting sampling site or technique. Antibiotics and collections at different times of admission were both considered significant influences on microbial community composition alteration. Detection of antibiotic resistance genes between rectal swabs and faeces were overall not significantly different, although some variations were detected with a potential association with the number of human sequence reads in a sample. CONCLUSION: Testing the gut microbiome using standard rectal swab collection techniques currently used for multi-resistant organism screening has been demonstrated to have utility in gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care. The use of information from this article, in terms of methodology as well as near equivalence demonstrated between rectal swabs and faeces will be able to support and potentially facilitate the introduction into clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-022-02487-0. BioMed Central 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9004175/ /pubmed/35413802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02487-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schlebusch, Sanmarié Graham, Rikki M. A. Jennison, Amy V. Lassig-Smith, Melissa M. Harris, Patrick N. A. Lipman, Jeffrey Ó Cuív, Páraic Paterson, David L. Standard rectal swabs as a surrogate sample for gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care |
title | Standard rectal swabs as a surrogate sample for gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care |
title_full | Standard rectal swabs as a surrogate sample for gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care |
title_fullStr | Standard rectal swabs as a surrogate sample for gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care |
title_full_unstemmed | Standard rectal swabs as a surrogate sample for gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care |
title_short | Standard rectal swabs as a surrogate sample for gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care |
title_sort | standard rectal swabs as a surrogate sample for gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9004175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02487-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schlebuschsanmarie standardrectalswabsasasurrogatesampleforgutmicrobiomemonitoringinintensivecare AT grahamrikkima standardrectalswabsasasurrogatesampleforgutmicrobiomemonitoringinintensivecare AT jennisonamyv standardrectalswabsasasurrogatesampleforgutmicrobiomemonitoringinintensivecare AT lassigsmithmelissam standardrectalswabsasasurrogatesampleforgutmicrobiomemonitoringinintensivecare AT harrispatrickna standardrectalswabsasasurrogatesampleforgutmicrobiomemonitoringinintensivecare AT lipmanjeffrey standardrectalswabsasasurrogatesampleforgutmicrobiomemonitoringinintensivecare AT ocuivparaic standardrectalswabsasasurrogatesampleforgutmicrobiomemonitoringinintensivecare AT patersondavidl standardrectalswabsasasurrogatesampleforgutmicrobiomemonitoringinintensivecare |