Cargando…
Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse
OBJECTIVE: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the most common cause of mitral regurgitation in developed countries. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of MVP is still not clear. In this study, we aimed to investigate how inflammatory markers such as monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Permanyer Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9005184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35414724 http://dx.doi.org/10.24875/ACM.21000127 |
_version_ | 1784686402829549568 |
---|---|
author | Yalim, Zafer Ersoy, İbrahim |
author_facet | Yalim, Zafer Ersoy, İbrahim |
author_sort | Yalim, Zafer |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the most common cause of mitral regurgitation in developed countries. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of MVP is still not clear. In this study, we aimed to investigate how inflammatory markers such as monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet/neutrophil ratio (PLR) are affected in MVP patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 461 patients with MVP and 459 normal echocardiographic patients, matched with gender and age. Inflammatory markers and all variables were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, or body mass index between the two groups. Neutrophil counts (4,960 [3,900-6,780]. 4,200 [3,800-5,600], p < 0.001), NLR (2.488 [1.72-4.51], 1.857 [1.49-2.38], p < 0.001), MHR (14.9 [11.9-18.6], 12.2 [9.4-17.3], p = 0.003), PLR (122.4 [85-171], 104.4 [85-130], p < 0.001), and CRP (0.71 ± 0.50, 0.67 ± 0.33 p < 0.001) were significantly higher, and LMR (3.75 [2.75-5.09], 4.06 [3.12-4.83] p = 0.016) was significantly lower in the MVP group than the control group, respectively. In logistic regression analysis, NLR (odds ratio [OR]: 1.058 [1.047-1.072]; p < 0.001), LMR (OR: 1.560 [1.211-2.522]; p = 0.027), and PLR (OR: 1.015 [1.012-1.019]; p = 0.003) were found to be independent predictors for MVP presence. CONCLUSIONS: These parameters can be used as a simple, low-cost, practical tool to detect inflammation in MVP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9005184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Permanyer Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90051842022-04-15 Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse Yalim, Zafer Ersoy, İbrahim Arch Cardiol Mex Research Article OBJECTIVE: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the most common cause of mitral regurgitation in developed countries. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of MVP is still not clear. In this study, we aimed to investigate how inflammatory markers such as monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet/neutrophil ratio (PLR) are affected in MVP patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 461 patients with MVP and 459 normal echocardiographic patients, matched with gender and age. Inflammatory markers and all variables were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, or body mass index between the two groups. Neutrophil counts (4,960 [3,900-6,780]. 4,200 [3,800-5,600], p < 0.001), NLR (2.488 [1.72-4.51], 1.857 [1.49-2.38], p < 0.001), MHR (14.9 [11.9-18.6], 12.2 [9.4-17.3], p = 0.003), PLR (122.4 [85-171], 104.4 [85-130], p < 0.001), and CRP (0.71 ± 0.50, 0.67 ± 0.33 p < 0.001) were significantly higher, and LMR (3.75 [2.75-5.09], 4.06 [3.12-4.83] p = 0.016) was significantly lower in the MVP group than the control group, respectively. In logistic regression analysis, NLR (odds ratio [OR]: 1.058 [1.047-1.072]; p < 0.001), LMR (OR: 1.560 [1.211-2.522]; p = 0.027), and PLR (OR: 1.015 [1.012-1.019]; p = 0.003) were found to be independent predictors for MVP presence. CONCLUSIONS: These parameters can be used as a simple, low-cost, practical tool to detect inflammation in MVP. Permanyer Publications 2022 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9005184/ /pubmed/35414724 http://dx.doi.org/10.24875/ACM.21000127 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Permanyer https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yalim, Zafer Ersoy, İbrahim Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse |
title | Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse |
title_full | Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse |
title_short | Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse |
title_sort | evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9005184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35414724 http://dx.doi.org/10.24875/ACM.21000127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yalimzafer evaluationofinflammationmarkersinmitralvalveprolapse AT ersoyibrahim evaluationofinflammationmarkersinmitralvalveprolapse |