Cargando…

Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse

OBJECTIVE: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the most common cause of mitral regurgitation in developed countries. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of MVP is still not clear. In this study, we aimed to investigate how inflammatory markers such as monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yalim, Zafer, Ersoy, İbrahim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Permanyer Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9005184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35414724
http://dx.doi.org/10.24875/ACM.21000127
_version_ 1784686402829549568
author Yalim, Zafer
Ersoy, İbrahim
author_facet Yalim, Zafer
Ersoy, İbrahim
author_sort Yalim, Zafer
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the most common cause of mitral regurgitation in developed countries. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of MVP is still not clear. In this study, we aimed to investigate how inflammatory markers such as monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet/neutrophil ratio (PLR) are affected in MVP patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 461 patients with MVP and 459 normal echocardiographic patients, matched with gender and age. Inflammatory markers and all variables were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, or body mass index between the two groups. Neutrophil counts (4,960 [3,900-6,780]. 4,200 [3,800-5,600], p < 0.001), NLR (2.488 [1.72-4.51], 1.857 [1.49-2.38], p < 0.001), MHR (14.9 [11.9-18.6], 12.2 [9.4-17.3], p = 0.003), PLR (122.4 [85-171], 104.4 [85-130], p < 0.001), and CRP (0.71 ± 0.50, 0.67 ± 0.33 p < 0.001) were significantly higher, and LMR (3.75 [2.75-5.09], 4.06 [3.12-4.83] p = 0.016) was significantly lower in the MVP group than the control group, respectively. In logistic regression analysis, NLR (odds ratio [OR]: 1.058 [1.047-1.072]; p < 0.001), LMR (OR: 1.560 [1.211-2.522]; p = 0.027), and PLR (OR: 1.015 [1.012-1.019]; p = 0.003) were found to be independent predictors for MVP presence. CONCLUSIONS: These parameters can be used as a simple, low-cost, practical tool to detect inflammation in MVP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9005184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Permanyer Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90051842022-04-15 Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse Yalim, Zafer Ersoy, İbrahim Arch Cardiol Mex Research Article OBJECTIVE: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the most common cause of mitral regurgitation in developed countries. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of MVP is still not clear. In this study, we aimed to investigate how inflammatory markers such as monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet/neutrophil ratio (PLR) are affected in MVP patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 461 patients with MVP and 459 normal echocardiographic patients, matched with gender and age. Inflammatory markers and all variables were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, or body mass index between the two groups. Neutrophil counts (4,960 [3,900-6,780]. 4,200 [3,800-5,600], p < 0.001), NLR (2.488 [1.72-4.51], 1.857 [1.49-2.38], p < 0.001), MHR (14.9 [11.9-18.6], 12.2 [9.4-17.3], p = 0.003), PLR (122.4 [85-171], 104.4 [85-130], p < 0.001), and CRP (0.71 ± 0.50, 0.67 ± 0.33 p < 0.001) were significantly higher, and LMR (3.75 [2.75-5.09], 4.06 [3.12-4.83] p = 0.016) was significantly lower in the MVP group than the control group, respectively. In logistic regression analysis, NLR (odds ratio [OR]: 1.058 [1.047-1.072]; p < 0.001), LMR (OR: 1.560 [1.211-2.522]; p = 0.027), and PLR (OR: 1.015 [1.012-1.019]; p = 0.003) were found to be independent predictors for MVP presence. CONCLUSIONS: These parameters can be used as a simple, low-cost, practical tool to detect inflammation in MVP. Permanyer Publications 2022 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9005184/ /pubmed/35414724 http://dx.doi.org/10.24875/ACM.21000127 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Permanyer https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Research Article
Yalim, Zafer
Ersoy, İbrahim
Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse
title Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse
title_full Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse
title_fullStr Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse
title_short Evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse
title_sort evaluation of inflammation markers in mitral valve prolapse
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9005184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35414724
http://dx.doi.org/10.24875/ACM.21000127
work_keys_str_mv AT yalimzafer evaluationofinflammationmarkersinmitralvalveprolapse
AT ersoyibrahim evaluationofinflammationmarkersinmitralvalveprolapse