Cargando…

Dosimetric Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Dental Structures of Head and Neck Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the radiation dose delivered to dental structures in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) without dental dose constraints, compare the dosimetry differences of dental structures between the two radi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yan, Zhou, Jianfeng, Wang, Hongyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9005284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4998997
_version_ 1784686424987009024
author Ma, Yan
Zhou, Jianfeng
Wang, Hongyong
author_facet Ma, Yan
Zhou, Jianfeng
Wang, Hongyong
author_sort Ma, Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the radiation dose delivered to dental structures in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) without dental dose constraints, compare the dosimetry differences of dental structures between the two radiation techniques, and determine whether dental structures should be one of the organs at risk for IMRT and VMAT plans according to the dosimetric analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 138 head and neck cancer patients (nasopharyngeal, oral cavity, pharyngeal, hypopharynx, and larynx), who underwent IMRT (69 patients) or VMAT (69 patients) from March 2016 to March 2021 in our hospital, were included to assess the dosimetry difference between two radiotherapy techniques for dental structures. RESULTS: The radiation dose delivered by IMRT and the mean maximum doses delivered by VMAT to the maxillary teeth of nasopharyngeal cancer patients were significantly higher than the dose received by the mandibular teeth. In contrast, the mandibular teeth of oral cavity cancer, oropharynx cancer, and laryngeal cancer received higher radiation doses than maxillary teeth. Except for mandibular teeth of oral cancer patients, the molars received significantly high-dose radiation than premolars and/or incisors in both radiotherapy techniques. No significant difference was observed between IMRT and VMAT in the dosimetric comparison of dental structures, except that oral cavity cancer patients treated with VMAT received a significantly higher mean average dose than those treated with IMRT. When PTV included level Ib, the radiation doses of the mandibular teeth delivered by both radiotherapy techniques were significantly higher than that in PTV when level Ib was excluded. CONCLUSION: Without dental dose constraints, no major difference was observed between IMRT and VMAT plans in tooth dose distribution. We suggest that dental structures should be delineated as part of the organ at risk (OAR) when IMRT and VMAT are planned. Meanwhile, attention should be paid to dental structures that might have a high-dose area according to the specific tumor location.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9005284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90052842022-04-13 Dosimetric Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Dental Structures of Head and Neck Cancer Patients Ma, Yan Zhou, Jianfeng Wang, Hongyong J Healthc Eng Research Article BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the radiation dose delivered to dental structures in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) without dental dose constraints, compare the dosimetry differences of dental structures between the two radiation techniques, and determine whether dental structures should be one of the organs at risk for IMRT and VMAT plans according to the dosimetric analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 138 head and neck cancer patients (nasopharyngeal, oral cavity, pharyngeal, hypopharynx, and larynx), who underwent IMRT (69 patients) or VMAT (69 patients) from March 2016 to March 2021 in our hospital, were included to assess the dosimetry difference between two radiotherapy techniques for dental structures. RESULTS: The radiation dose delivered by IMRT and the mean maximum doses delivered by VMAT to the maxillary teeth of nasopharyngeal cancer patients were significantly higher than the dose received by the mandibular teeth. In contrast, the mandibular teeth of oral cavity cancer, oropharynx cancer, and laryngeal cancer received higher radiation doses than maxillary teeth. Except for mandibular teeth of oral cancer patients, the molars received significantly high-dose radiation than premolars and/or incisors in both radiotherapy techniques. No significant difference was observed between IMRT and VMAT in the dosimetric comparison of dental structures, except that oral cavity cancer patients treated with VMAT received a significantly higher mean average dose than those treated with IMRT. When PTV included level Ib, the radiation doses of the mandibular teeth delivered by both radiotherapy techniques were significantly higher than that in PTV when level Ib was excluded. CONCLUSION: Without dental dose constraints, no major difference was observed between IMRT and VMAT plans in tooth dose distribution. We suggest that dental structures should be delineated as part of the organ at risk (OAR) when IMRT and VMAT are planned. Meanwhile, attention should be paid to dental structures that might have a high-dose area according to the specific tumor location. Hindawi 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9005284/ /pubmed/35422981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4998997 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yan Ma et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ma, Yan
Zhou, Jianfeng
Wang, Hongyong
Dosimetric Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Dental Structures of Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title Dosimetric Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Dental Structures of Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_full Dosimetric Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Dental Structures of Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Dosimetric Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Dental Structures of Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Dental Structures of Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_short Dosimetric Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Dental Structures of Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_sort dosimetric comparison between volumetric modulated arc therapy (vmat) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (imrt) for dental structures of head and neck cancer patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9005284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4998997
work_keys_str_mv AT mayan dosimetriccomparisonbetweenvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatandintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtfordentalstructuresofheadandneckcancerpatients
AT zhoujianfeng dosimetriccomparisonbetweenvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatandintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtfordentalstructuresofheadandneckcancerpatients
AT wanghongyong dosimetriccomparisonbetweenvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatandintensitymodulatedradiotherapyimrtfordentalstructuresofheadandneckcancerpatients