Cargando…
Wahlfach Robotische Chirurgie – Faszination Lehre(n)?
BACKGROUND: Even though robot-assisted operations have evolved to a standard procedure in surgery, they are underrepresented in the curriculum of current medical students. OBJECTIVES: We present our experience and findings in Germany’s first elective “Robot-assisted surgery” at a urological departme...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9005389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35037971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-021-01756-6 |
_version_ | 1784686449160880128 |
---|---|
author | Zeuschner, Philip Becker, Philippe Heinzelbecker, Julia Linxweiler, Johannes Siemer, Stefan Stöckle, Michael Saar, Matthias |
author_facet | Zeuschner, Philip Becker, Philippe Heinzelbecker, Julia Linxweiler, Johannes Siemer, Stefan Stöckle, Michael Saar, Matthias |
author_sort | Zeuschner, Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Even though robot-assisted operations have evolved to a standard procedure in surgery, they are underrepresented in the curriculum of current medical students. OBJECTIVES: We present our experience and findings in Germany’s first elective “Robot-assisted surgery” at a urological department for undergraduate medical students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten undergraduates in their final years were taught the theoretical basics and practical skills in robot-assisted surgery within six lessons each lasting 2 h, including the opportunity to observe a live robot-assisted surgery. The increase of knowledge (ten multiple-choice questions) and skills (exercises Camera 0, Clutch, and Sea Spikes 1) on a robotic simulation device were quantified including an evaluation of the student’s perspective. RESULTS: The 10 participants had a significant increase in knowledge and gave at a median of 3.5 additional correct answers in the final assessment (p = 0.011). For two out of three practical exercises, the overall score significantly increased (Camera 0 and Sea Spikes 1, for both p < 0.05), but for the exercise “Clutch”, only economy of motion significantly improved (p = 0.028). The elective was evaluated (very) good and the willingness of the participants to become urologists significantly increased (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: There is a great interest of many undergraduate medical students in robot-assisted surgery. Offering an elective appears to be an excellent format to teach the theoretical background and practical skills in robotic (urologic) surgery. Moreover, such an elective could raise more attention to the field of urology and might attract future colleagues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9005389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Medizin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90053892022-04-14 Wahlfach Robotische Chirurgie – Faszination Lehre(n)? Zeuschner, Philip Becker, Philippe Heinzelbecker, Julia Linxweiler, Johannes Siemer, Stefan Stöckle, Michael Saar, Matthias Urologe A Originalien BACKGROUND: Even though robot-assisted operations have evolved to a standard procedure in surgery, they are underrepresented in the curriculum of current medical students. OBJECTIVES: We present our experience and findings in Germany’s first elective “Robot-assisted surgery” at a urological department for undergraduate medical students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten undergraduates in their final years were taught the theoretical basics and practical skills in robot-assisted surgery within six lessons each lasting 2 h, including the opportunity to observe a live robot-assisted surgery. The increase of knowledge (ten multiple-choice questions) and skills (exercises Camera 0, Clutch, and Sea Spikes 1) on a robotic simulation device were quantified including an evaluation of the student’s perspective. RESULTS: The 10 participants had a significant increase in knowledge and gave at a median of 3.5 additional correct answers in the final assessment (p = 0.011). For two out of three practical exercises, the overall score significantly increased (Camera 0 and Sea Spikes 1, for both p < 0.05), but for the exercise “Clutch”, only economy of motion significantly improved (p = 0.028). The elective was evaluated (very) good and the willingness of the participants to become urologists significantly increased (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: There is a great interest of many undergraduate medical students in robot-assisted surgery. Offering an elective appears to be an excellent format to teach the theoretical background and practical skills in robotic (urologic) surgery. Moreover, such an elective could raise more attention to the field of urology and might attract future colleagues. Springer Medizin 2022-01-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9005389/ /pubmed/35037971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-021-01756-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Originalien Zeuschner, Philip Becker, Philippe Heinzelbecker, Julia Linxweiler, Johannes Siemer, Stefan Stöckle, Michael Saar, Matthias Wahlfach Robotische Chirurgie – Faszination Lehre(n)? |
title | Wahlfach Robotische Chirurgie – Faszination Lehre(n)? |
title_full | Wahlfach Robotische Chirurgie – Faszination Lehre(n)? |
title_fullStr | Wahlfach Robotische Chirurgie – Faszination Lehre(n)? |
title_full_unstemmed | Wahlfach Robotische Chirurgie – Faszination Lehre(n)? |
title_short | Wahlfach Robotische Chirurgie – Faszination Lehre(n)? |
title_sort | wahlfach robotische chirurgie – faszination lehre(n)? |
topic | Originalien |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9005389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35037971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-021-01756-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zeuschnerphilip wahlfachrobotischechirurgiefaszinationlehren AT beckerphilippe wahlfachrobotischechirurgiefaszinationlehren AT heinzelbeckerjulia wahlfachrobotischechirurgiefaszinationlehren AT linxweilerjohannes wahlfachrobotischechirurgiefaszinationlehren AT siemerstefan wahlfachrobotischechirurgiefaszinationlehren AT stocklemichael wahlfachrobotischechirurgiefaszinationlehren AT saarmatthias wahlfachrobotischechirurgiefaszinationlehren |