Cargando…

Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on a Regional Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Service During the First Wave of COVID-19

Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI). This study evaluates the impact of COVID-19 on the authors' pPCI service. Methods: A retrospective study of referrals to the Belfast pPCI service between 23 Ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olusan, Adeogo Akinwale, Devlin, Peadar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Radcliffe Cardiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9006124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35432596
http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/icr.2021.22
_version_ 1784686602778312704
author Olusan, Adeogo Akinwale
Devlin, Peadar
author_facet Olusan, Adeogo Akinwale
Devlin, Peadar
author_sort Olusan, Adeogo Akinwale
collection PubMed
description Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI). This study evaluates the impact of COVID-19 on the authors' pPCI service. Methods: A retrospective study of referrals to the Belfast pPCI service between 23 March and 9 June 2020 – the period of the first full lockdown in the UK – was performed. All ECGs were reviewed alongside patient history. A pPCI turndown was deemed inappropriate if the review demonstrated that the criteria to qualify for pPCI had been met. The number of pPCIs was compared with 2019. Results: The unit had 388 referrals in 78 days, from which 134 patients were accepted for pPCI and 235 referrals were turned down. Of these, nine (4%) were deemed inappropriate. No referrals were turned down because of COVID-19. Of the nine inappropriate cases, six had pPCI following re-referral, two had routine PCI and one had takotsubo syndrome. From the accepted cohort, 85% had pPCI. In the appropriate turndown cohort, there was a final cardiovascular diagnosis in 53% (n=127) of patients, 1-year mortality was 16% (n=38), 55% (n=21) of which were due to a cardiovascular death. There was a 29% reduction in the number of pPCIs performed compared with 2019. Conclusion: During the first wave of COVID-19 there was a significant reduction in the number of pPCIs performed at the Department of Cardiology at Royal Victoria Hospital in Belfast. This was not due to an increase in referrals being inappropriately turned down. The majority of the cohort who had their referral turned down had a final cardiovascular diagnosis unrelated to STEMI; 1-year mortality in this group was significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9006124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Radcliffe Cardiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90061242022-04-15 Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on a Regional Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Service During the First Wave of COVID-19 Olusan, Adeogo Akinwale Devlin, Peadar Interv Cardiol Coronary Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI). This study evaluates the impact of COVID-19 on the authors' pPCI service. Methods: A retrospective study of referrals to the Belfast pPCI service between 23 March and 9 June 2020 – the period of the first full lockdown in the UK – was performed. All ECGs were reviewed alongside patient history. A pPCI turndown was deemed inappropriate if the review demonstrated that the criteria to qualify for pPCI had been met. The number of pPCIs was compared with 2019. Results: The unit had 388 referrals in 78 days, from which 134 patients were accepted for pPCI and 235 referrals were turned down. Of these, nine (4%) were deemed inappropriate. No referrals were turned down because of COVID-19. Of the nine inappropriate cases, six had pPCI following re-referral, two had routine PCI and one had takotsubo syndrome. From the accepted cohort, 85% had pPCI. In the appropriate turndown cohort, there was a final cardiovascular diagnosis in 53% (n=127) of patients, 1-year mortality was 16% (n=38), 55% (n=21) of which were due to a cardiovascular death. There was a 29% reduction in the number of pPCIs performed compared with 2019. Conclusion: During the first wave of COVID-19 there was a significant reduction in the number of pPCIs performed at the Department of Cardiology at Royal Victoria Hospital in Belfast. This was not due to an increase in referrals being inappropriately turned down. The majority of the cohort who had their referral turned down had a final cardiovascular diagnosis unrelated to STEMI; 1-year mortality in this group was significant. Radcliffe Cardiology 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9006124/ /pubmed/35432596 http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/icr.2021.22 Text en Copyright © 2022, Radcliffe Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Data Availability: The data that support this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions. Declaration of Helsinki: This research work adheres to the tenets within the declaration of Helsinki. Informed Consent: All patients provided consent for data follow-up and publication as part of the National Institute of Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR)/British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) data, which is covered by section 251 of the NHS Act 2006. Authors' Contributions: Conceptualisation: AAO; formal analysis: AAO; investigation: AAO, PD; methodology: AAO, PD; project administration: AAO; resources: AAO, PD; writing – original: AAO; writing – review and editing: AAO, PD. This work is open access under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License which allows users to copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly.
spellingShingle Coronary
Olusan, Adeogo Akinwale
Devlin, Peadar
Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on a Regional Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Service During the First Wave of COVID-19
title Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on a Regional Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Service During the First Wave of COVID-19
title_full Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on a Regional Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Service During the First Wave of COVID-19
title_fullStr Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on a Regional Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Service During the First Wave of COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on a Regional Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Service During the First Wave of COVID-19
title_short Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on a Regional Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Service During the First Wave of COVID-19
title_sort evaluating the impact of covid-19 on a regional primary percutaneous coronary intervention service during the first wave of covid-19
topic Coronary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9006124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35432596
http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/icr.2021.22
work_keys_str_mv AT olusanadeogoakinwale evaluatingtheimpactofcovid19onaregionalprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionserviceduringthefirstwaveofcovid19
AT devlinpeadar evaluatingtheimpactofcovid19onaregionalprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionserviceduringthefirstwaveofcovid19