Cargando…

Difference in cardiac remodeling between female athletes and pregnant women: a case control study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to detect possible differences in reversible cardiac remodeling occurring in sport training and twin pregnancy. Background: cardiac remodeling occurs in athletes and pregnant women due to training and fetal requirements, respectively. These changes could be appa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toncelli, Loira, Pasquini, Lucia, Masini, Giulia, Orlandi, Melissa, Paci, Gabriele, Mecacci, Federico, Pedrizzetti, Gianni, Galanti, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9006435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35418063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-022-00280-7
_version_ 1784686665108815872
author Toncelli, Loira
Pasquini, Lucia
Masini, Giulia
Orlandi, Melissa
Paci, Gabriele
Mecacci, Federico
Pedrizzetti, Gianni
Galanti, Giorgio
author_facet Toncelli, Loira
Pasquini, Lucia
Masini, Giulia
Orlandi, Melissa
Paci, Gabriele
Mecacci, Federico
Pedrizzetti, Gianni
Galanti, Giorgio
author_sort Toncelli, Loira
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to detect possible differences in reversible cardiac remodeling occurring in sport training and twin pregnancy. Background: cardiac remodeling occurs in athletes and pregnant women due to training and fetal requirements, respectively. These changes could be apparently similar. METHODS: 21 female elite athletes (23.2 ± 5.3 years), 25 women with twin pregnancies (35.4 ± 5.7 years) and 25 healthy competitive female athletes (controls), age-matched with pregnant women (34.9 ± 7.9 years), were enrolled. This latter group was included to minimize the effect of age on cardiac remodeling. All women evaluated through anamnestic collection, physical examination, 12 leads ECG, standard echocardiogram and strain analysis. Sphericity (SI) and apical conicity (ACI) indexes were also calculated. RESULTS: Pregnant women showed higher LA dimension (p < 0.001) compared to both groups of athletes. LV e RV GLS were significantly different in pregnant women compared to female athletes (p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). RV GLS was also different between pregnant women and controls (p = 0.02). Pregnant women showed significantly higher S′ wave compared to female athletes (p = 0.02) but not controls. Parameters of diastolic function were significantly higher in athletes (p = 0.08 for IVRT and p < 0.001 for E/A,). SI was lower in athletes in both diastole (p = 0.01) and systole (p < 0.001), while ACIs was lower in pregnant women (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac remodeling of athletes and pregnant women could be similar at first sight but different in LV shape and in GLS, highlighting a profound difference in longitudinal deformation between athletes and pregnant women. This difference seems not to be related with age. These findings suggest that an initial maternal cardiovascular maladaptation could occur in the third trimester of twin pregnancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9006435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90064352022-04-14 Difference in cardiac remodeling between female athletes and pregnant women: a case control study Toncelli, Loira Pasquini, Lucia Masini, Giulia Orlandi, Melissa Paci, Gabriele Mecacci, Federico Pedrizzetti, Gianni Galanti, Giorgio Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to detect possible differences in reversible cardiac remodeling occurring in sport training and twin pregnancy. Background: cardiac remodeling occurs in athletes and pregnant women due to training and fetal requirements, respectively. These changes could be apparently similar. METHODS: 21 female elite athletes (23.2 ± 5.3 years), 25 women with twin pregnancies (35.4 ± 5.7 years) and 25 healthy competitive female athletes (controls), age-matched with pregnant women (34.9 ± 7.9 years), were enrolled. This latter group was included to minimize the effect of age on cardiac remodeling. All women evaluated through anamnestic collection, physical examination, 12 leads ECG, standard echocardiogram and strain analysis. Sphericity (SI) and apical conicity (ACI) indexes were also calculated. RESULTS: Pregnant women showed higher LA dimension (p < 0.001) compared to both groups of athletes. LV e RV GLS were significantly different in pregnant women compared to female athletes (p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). RV GLS was also different between pregnant women and controls (p = 0.02). Pregnant women showed significantly higher S′ wave compared to female athletes (p = 0.02) but not controls. Parameters of diastolic function were significantly higher in athletes (p = 0.08 for IVRT and p < 0.001 for E/A,). SI was lower in athletes in both diastole (p = 0.01) and systole (p < 0.001), while ACIs was lower in pregnant women (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac remodeling of athletes and pregnant women could be similar at first sight but different in LV shape and in GLS, highlighting a profound difference in longitudinal deformation between athletes and pregnant women. This difference seems not to be related with age. These findings suggest that an initial maternal cardiovascular maladaptation could occur in the third trimester of twin pregnancies. BioMed Central 2022-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9006435/ /pubmed/35418063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-022-00280-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Toncelli, Loira
Pasquini, Lucia
Masini, Giulia
Orlandi, Melissa
Paci, Gabriele
Mecacci, Federico
Pedrizzetti, Gianni
Galanti, Giorgio
Difference in cardiac remodeling between female athletes and pregnant women: a case control study
title Difference in cardiac remodeling between female athletes and pregnant women: a case control study
title_full Difference in cardiac remodeling between female athletes and pregnant women: a case control study
title_fullStr Difference in cardiac remodeling between female athletes and pregnant women: a case control study
title_full_unstemmed Difference in cardiac remodeling between female athletes and pregnant women: a case control study
title_short Difference in cardiac remodeling between female athletes and pregnant women: a case control study
title_sort difference in cardiac remodeling between female athletes and pregnant women: a case control study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9006435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35418063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-022-00280-7
work_keys_str_mv AT toncelliloira differenceincardiacremodelingbetweenfemaleathletesandpregnantwomenacasecontrolstudy
AT pasquinilucia differenceincardiacremodelingbetweenfemaleathletesandpregnantwomenacasecontrolstudy
AT masinigiulia differenceincardiacremodelingbetweenfemaleathletesandpregnantwomenacasecontrolstudy
AT orlandimelissa differenceincardiacremodelingbetweenfemaleathletesandpregnantwomenacasecontrolstudy
AT pacigabriele differenceincardiacremodelingbetweenfemaleathletesandpregnantwomenacasecontrolstudy
AT mecaccifederico differenceincardiacremodelingbetweenfemaleathletesandpregnantwomenacasecontrolstudy
AT pedrizzettigianni differenceincardiacremodelingbetweenfemaleathletesandpregnantwomenacasecontrolstudy
AT galantigiorgio differenceincardiacremodelingbetweenfemaleathletesandpregnantwomenacasecontrolstudy