Cargando…

Methodological assessment of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of in-vitro studies, like any other study, can be of heterogeneous quality. The present study aimed to evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies. METHODS: We searched for systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies in PubMed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hammel, Christopher, Pandis, Nikolaos, Pieper, Dawid, Faggion, Clovis Mariano
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2022
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9006561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01575-z

Ejemplares similares

A new method for testing reproducibility in systematic reviews was developed, but needs more testing
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reporting of flow diagrams in randomised controlled trials published in periodontology and implantology: a survey
por: Meyer, Hanns-Gustav Julius, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals
por: Faggion, Clovis Mariano, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Quality measures for dental care: A systematic review
por: Righolt, Amy Joyce, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A Primer on Network Meta-Analysis for Dental Research
por: Tu, Yu-Kang, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Methodological Quality of Consensus Guidelines in Implant Dentistry
por: Faggion, Clovis Mariano, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Effect of nanofibers as reinforcement on resin-based dental materials: A systematic review of in vitro studies()
por: Albergaria, Laís Santos, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Correction: Methodological Quality of Consensus Guidelines in Implant Dentistry
por: Faggion, Clovis Mariano, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessing transferability in systematic reviews of health economic evaluations – a review of methodological guidance
por: Weise, Alina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study
por: Goossen, Käthe, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor
por: Faggion, Clovis Mariano
Publicado: (2015)

Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review
por: Waffenschmidt, Siw, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance
por: Büchter, Roland Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
por: Dosenovic, Svjetlana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

An algorithm for the classification of study designs to assess diagnostic, prognostic and predictive test accuracy in systematic reviews
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Strategies used to manage overlap of primary study data by exercise-related overviews: protocol for a systematic methodological review
por: Gutierrez-Arias, Ruvistay, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effect of Risk of Bias on the Effect Size of Meta-Analytic Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry
por: Faggion, Clovis Mariano, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Adherence influencing factors – a systematic review of systematic reviews
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews
por: Morche, Johannes, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Correction: Effect of Risk of Bias on the Effect Size of Meta-Analytic Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry
por: Faggion, Clovis Mariano, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks
por: Krnic Martinic, Marina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews
por: Welsh, Emma J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessment of redundancy, methodological and reporting quality, and potential discrepancies of results of systematic reviews of early mobilisation of critically ill adults: a meta-research protocol
por: Gutierrez-Arias, Ruvistay, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Blinded by PRISMA: Are Systematic Reviewers Focusing on PRISMA and Ignoring Other Guidelines?
por: Fleming, Padhraig S., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Where to prospectively register a systematic review
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Methodological quality and risk of bias of systematic reviews about loading time of multiple dental implants in totally or partially edentulous patients: An umbrella systematic review
por: Heiderich, Clovis Marinho Carvalho, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study
por: Matthias, Katja, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Early Optimistic Effect in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry Trials
por: Menne, M.C., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews
por: Lunny, Carole, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Clarifying the distinction between case series and cohort studies in systematic reviews of comparative studies: potential impact on body of evidence and workload
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A systematic review of the impact of center volume in dialysis
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols
por: Pandis, Nikolaos, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Are orthodontic randomised controlled trials justified with a citation of an appropriate systematic review?
por: Patel, Kishan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization in Norwood procedure
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The effects of fixed and removable orthodontic retainers: a systematic review
por: Al-Moghrabi, Dalya, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Methodology in specimen fabrication for in vitro dental studies: Standardization of extracted tooth preparation
por: Fernández-Estevan, Lucía, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Are Sample Sizes Clear and Justified in RCTs Published in Dental Journals?
por: Koletsi, Despina, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Restrictions and their reporting in systematic reviews of effectiveness: an observational study
por: Helbach, Jasmin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_jo34mebnd5quql776fotn0qok0