Cargando…
Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it
INTRODUCTION: Chest compression fraction (CCF) is the cumulative time spent providing chest compressions divided by the total time taken for the entire resuscitation. Targeting a CCF of at least 60% is intended to limit interruptions in compressions and maximize coronary perfusion during resuscitati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9006719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35431482 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_36_21 |
_version_ | 1784686720550174720 |
---|---|
author | Mathew, Deo Krishnan, S. Vimal Abraham, Siju V. Varghese, Salish Thomas, Minu Rose Palatty, Babu Urumese |
author_facet | Mathew, Deo Krishnan, S. Vimal Abraham, Siju V. Varghese, Salish Thomas, Minu Rose Palatty, Babu Urumese |
author_sort | Mathew, Deo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Chest compression fraction (CCF) is the cumulative time spent providing chest compressions divided by the total time taken for the entire resuscitation. Targeting a CCF of at least 60% is intended to limit interruptions in compressions and maximize coronary perfusion during resuscitation. We aimed to identify the mean CCF and its relationship with various factors affecting it. METHODS: Patients presenting to the emergency department in cardiac arrest at a single center were prospectively included in this study. Resuscitation was provided by trained health-care providers. The feedback device Cprmeter2™ was placed on the patient's sternum at the beginning of resuscitation. The total time taken for the entire resuscitation was noted by the device and CCF calculated. RESULTS: The mean CCF was analyzed using descriptive statistics and was found to be 71.60% ± 7.52%. The total duration of resuscitation (R = −0.55, P = < 0.001, min-max, 2.02–34.31, mean 12.25 ± 6.54), number of people giving chest compressions (R = −0.48, P = < 0.001, min-max, 1–6, mean 4.04 ± 1.12), and total number of team members in resuscitation (R = −0.50, P = < 0.001, min-max, 4–10, mean 6.65 ± 1.32) had negative correlation with CCF. Diurnal variation (day, n = 35; mean 69.20% ± 7% and night, n = 20; mean 75.80% ± 5.6%, P = 0.001) and patients receiving defibrillation (receiving n = 10 mean 67.00% ± 4.11% and not receiving n = 45 mean 72.62 ± 7.42%, P = 0.005) were found to significantly affect CCF. CONCLUSION: The mean CCF for cardiac arrest patients was well within the targets of guideline recommendation. CCF decreased when resuscitation lasted longer, during daytime when the defibrillator was used, the total team members increased, and also when the number of people giving chest compressions increased. CCF during resuscitation may improve if there is a focus on improving these factors and requires validation in multicentric settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9006719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90067192022-04-14 Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it Mathew, Deo Krishnan, S. Vimal Abraham, Siju V. Varghese, Salish Thomas, Minu Rose Palatty, Babu Urumese J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article INTRODUCTION: Chest compression fraction (CCF) is the cumulative time spent providing chest compressions divided by the total time taken for the entire resuscitation. Targeting a CCF of at least 60% is intended to limit interruptions in compressions and maximize coronary perfusion during resuscitation. We aimed to identify the mean CCF and its relationship with various factors affecting it. METHODS: Patients presenting to the emergency department in cardiac arrest at a single center were prospectively included in this study. Resuscitation was provided by trained health-care providers. The feedback device Cprmeter2™ was placed on the patient's sternum at the beginning of resuscitation. The total time taken for the entire resuscitation was noted by the device and CCF calculated. RESULTS: The mean CCF was analyzed using descriptive statistics and was found to be 71.60% ± 7.52%. The total duration of resuscitation (R = −0.55, P = < 0.001, min-max, 2.02–34.31, mean 12.25 ± 6.54), number of people giving chest compressions (R = −0.48, P = < 0.001, min-max, 1–6, mean 4.04 ± 1.12), and total number of team members in resuscitation (R = −0.50, P = < 0.001, min-max, 4–10, mean 6.65 ± 1.32) had negative correlation with CCF. Diurnal variation (day, n = 35; mean 69.20% ± 7% and night, n = 20; mean 75.80% ± 5.6%, P = 0.001) and patients receiving defibrillation (receiving n = 10 mean 67.00% ± 4.11% and not receiving n = 45 mean 72.62 ± 7.42%, P = 0.005) were found to significantly affect CCF. CONCLUSION: The mean CCF for cardiac arrest patients was well within the targets of guideline recommendation. CCF decreased when resuscitation lasted longer, during daytime when the defibrillator was used, the total team members increased, and also when the number of people giving chest compressions increased. CCF during resuscitation may improve if there is a focus on improving these factors and requires validation in multicentric settings. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9006719/ /pubmed/35431482 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_36_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mathew, Deo Krishnan, S. Vimal Abraham, Siju V. Varghese, Salish Thomas, Minu Rose Palatty, Babu Urumese Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it |
title | Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it |
title_full | Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it |
title_fullStr | Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it |
title_full_unstemmed | Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it |
title_short | Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it |
title_sort | chest compression fraction and factors influencing it |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9006719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35431482 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_36_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mathewdeo chestcompressionfractionandfactorsinfluencingit AT krishnansvimal chestcompressionfractionandfactorsinfluencingit AT abrahamsijuv chestcompressionfractionandfactorsinfluencingit AT varghesesalish chestcompressionfractionandfactorsinfluencingit AT thomasminurose chestcompressionfractionandfactorsinfluencingit AT palattybabuurumese chestcompressionfractionandfactorsinfluencingit |