Cargando…

Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it

INTRODUCTION: Chest compression fraction (CCF) is the cumulative time spent providing chest compressions divided by the total time taken for the entire resuscitation. Targeting a CCF of at least 60% is intended to limit interruptions in compressions and maximize coronary perfusion during resuscitati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathew, Deo, Krishnan, S. Vimal, Abraham, Siju V., Varghese, Salish, Thomas, Minu Rose, Palatty, Babu Urumese
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9006719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35431482
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_36_21
_version_ 1784686720550174720
author Mathew, Deo
Krishnan, S. Vimal
Abraham, Siju V.
Varghese, Salish
Thomas, Minu Rose
Palatty, Babu Urumese
author_facet Mathew, Deo
Krishnan, S. Vimal
Abraham, Siju V.
Varghese, Salish
Thomas, Minu Rose
Palatty, Babu Urumese
author_sort Mathew, Deo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chest compression fraction (CCF) is the cumulative time spent providing chest compressions divided by the total time taken for the entire resuscitation. Targeting a CCF of at least 60% is intended to limit interruptions in compressions and maximize coronary perfusion during resuscitation. We aimed to identify the mean CCF and its relationship with various factors affecting it. METHODS: Patients presenting to the emergency department in cardiac arrest at a single center were prospectively included in this study. Resuscitation was provided by trained health-care providers. The feedback device Cprmeter2™ was placed on the patient's sternum at the beginning of resuscitation. The total time taken for the entire resuscitation was noted by the device and CCF calculated. RESULTS: The mean CCF was analyzed using descriptive statistics and was found to be 71.60% ± 7.52%. The total duration of resuscitation (R = −0.55, P = < 0.001, min-max, 2.02–34.31, mean 12.25 ± 6.54), number of people giving chest compressions (R = −0.48, P = < 0.001, min-max, 1–6, mean 4.04 ± 1.12), and total number of team members in resuscitation (R = −0.50, P = < 0.001, min-max, 4–10, mean 6.65 ± 1.32) had negative correlation with CCF. Diurnal variation (day, n = 35; mean 69.20% ± 7% and night, n = 20; mean 75.80% ± 5.6%, P = 0.001) and patients receiving defibrillation (receiving n = 10 mean 67.00% ± 4.11% and not receiving n = 45 mean 72.62 ± 7.42%, P = 0.005) were found to significantly affect CCF. CONCLUSION: The mean CCF for cardiac arrest patients was well within the targets of guideline recommendation. CCF decreased when resuscitation lasted longer, during daytime when the defibrillator was used, the total team members increased, and also when the number of people giving chest compressions increased. CCF during resuscitation may improve if there is a focus on improving these factors and requires validation in multicentric settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9006719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90067192022-04-14 Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it Mathew, Deo Krishnan, S. Vimal Abraham, Siju V. Varghese, Salish Thomas, Minu Rose Palatty, Babu Urumese J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article INTRODUCTION: Chest compression fraction (CCF) is the cumulative time spent providing chest compressions divided by the total time taken for the entire resuscitation. Targeting a CCF of at least 60% is intended to limit interruptions in compressions and maximize coronary perfusion during resuscitation. We aimed to identify the mean CCF and its relationship with various factors affecting it. METHODS: Patients presenting to the emergency department in cardiac arrest at a single center were prospectively included in this study. Resuscitation was provided by trained health-care providers. The feedback device Cprmeter2™ was placed on the patient's sternum at the beginning of resuscitation. The total time taken for the entire resuscitation was noted by the device and CCF calculated. RESULTS: The mean CCF was analyzed using descriptive statistics and was found to be 71.60% ± 7.52%. The total duration of resuscitation (R = −0.55, P = < 0.001, min-max, 2.02–34.31, mean 12.25 ± 6.54), number of people giving chest compressions (R = −0.48, P = < 0.001, min-max, 1–6, mean 4.04 ± 1.12), and total number of team members in resuscitation (R = −0.50, P = < 0.001, min-max, 4–10, mean 6.65 ± 1.32) had negative correlation with CCF. Diurnal variation (day, n = 35; mean 69.20% ± 7% and night, n = 20; mean 75.80% ± 5.6%, P = 0.001) and patients receiving defibrillation (receiving n = 10 mean 67.00% ± 4.11% and not receiving n = 45 mean 72.62 ± 7.42%, P = 0.005) were found to significantly affect CCF. CONCLUSION: The mean CCF for cardiac arrest patients was well within the targets of guideline recommendation. CCF decreased when resuscitation lasted longer, during daytime when the defibrillator was used, the total team members increased, and also when the number of people giving chest compressions increased. CCF during resuscitation may improve if there is a focus on improving these factors and requires validation in multicentric settings. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9006719/ /pubmed/35431482 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_36_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mathew, Deo
Krishnan, S. Vimal
Abraham, Siju V.
Varghese, Salish
Thomas, Minu Rose
Palatty, Babu Urumese
Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it
title Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it
title_full Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it
title_fullStr Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it
title_full_unstemmed Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it
title_short Chest Compression Fraction and Factors influencing it
title_sort chest compression fraction and factors influencing it
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9006719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35431482
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_36_21
work_keys_str_mv AT mathewdeo chestcompressionfractionandfactorsinfluencingit
AT krishnansvimal chestcompressionfractionandfactorsinfluencingit
AT abrahamsijuv chestcompressionfractionandfactorsinfluencingit
AT varghesesalish chestcompressionfractionandfactorsinfluencingit
AT thomasminurose chestcompressionfractionandfactorsinfluencingit
AT palattybabuurumese chestcompressionfractionandfactorsinfluencingit