Cargando…

Applying the PRECIS-2 tool for self-declared ‘pragmatic’ acupuncture trials: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: The pragmatic design has received much attention in the field of acupuncture clinical trials because of insufficient information about the specific effects of acupuncture. However, pragmatism in pragmatic acupuncture trials has not been comprehensively investigated. The PRECIS-2 tool w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Jinwoong, Lee, Hyeonhoon, Kim, Yong-Suk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9006803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35414545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052861
_version_ 1784686737531863040
author Lim, Jinwoong
Lee, Hyeonhoon
Kim, Yong-Suk
author_facet Lim, Jinwoong
Lee, Hyeonhoon
Kim, Yong-Suk
author_sort Lim, Jinwoong
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The pragmatic design has received much attention in the field of acupuncture clinical trials because of insufficient information about the specific effects of acupuncture. However, pragmatism in pragmatic acupuncture trials has not been comprehensively investigated. The PRECIS-2 tool was developed and has been gradually used to design pragmatic trials; therefore, we will apply the PRECIS-2 tool to investigate the pragmatism of pragmatic acupuncture trials in this study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this systematic review, self-declared ‘pragmatic’ randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or protocols of self-declared ‘pragmatic’ RCTs investigating acupuncture will be searched and included to be reviewed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, WANFANG, Taiwan Periodical Literature Database, KoreaMed, KMbase, Research Information Service System, Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System, CiNii and ClinicalTrials.gov for registered trials will be electronically searched from inception to March 2022. Protocols of published RCTs or secondary analysis of RCTs will be excluded. Additionally, no language restriction will be applied. Two authors will independently extract descriptive information and assess the pragmatism of pragmatic acupuncture trials using nine domains of the PRECIS-2 tool and one additional domain—control. Descriptive statistics will be reported for each domain and the overall score, and a one-sample t-test will be used to statistically analyse whether the score is greater than 3 (equally pragmatic and explanatory). The wheel diagrams of the nine domains of the PRECIS-2 tool will be used to demonstrate the pragmatism of the included studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not warranted as this study will obtain data from previously reported articles. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021236975.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9006803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90068032022-05-02 Applying the PRECIS-2 tool for self-declared ‘pragmatic’ acupuncture trials: protocol for a systematic review Lim, Jinwoong Lee, Hyeonhoon Kim, Yong-Suk BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: The pragmatic design has received much attention in the field of acupuncture clinical trials because of insufficient information about the specific effects of acupuncture. However, pragmatism in pragmatic acupuncture trials has not been comprehensively investigated. The PRECIS-2 tool was developed and has been gradually used to design pragmatic trials; therefore, we will apply the PRECIS-2 tool to investigate the pragmatism of pragmatic acupuncture trials in this study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this systematic review, self-declared ‘pragmatic’ randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or protocols of self-declared ‘pragmatic’ RCTs investigating acupuncture will be searched and included to be reviewed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, WANFANG, Taiwan Periodical Literature Database, KoreaMed, KMbase, Research Information Service System, Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System, CiNii and ClinicalTrials.gov for registered trials will be electronically searched from inception to March 2022. Protocols of published RCTs or secondary analysis of RCTs will be excluded. Additionally, no language restriction will be applied. Two authors will independently extract descriptive information and assess the pragmatism of pragmatic acupuncture trials using nine domains of the PRECIS-2 tool and one additional domain—control. Descriptive statistics will be reported for each domain and the overall score, and a one-sample t-test will be used to statistically analyse whether the score is greater than 3 (equally pragmatic and explanatory). The wheel diagrams of the nine domains of the PRECIS-2 tool will be used to demonstrate the pragmatism of the included studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not warranted as this study will obtain data from previously reported articles. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021236975. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9006803/ /pubmed/35414545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052861 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Methods
Lim, Jinwoong
Lee, Hyeonhoon
Kim, Yong-Suk
Applying the PRECIS-2 tool for self-declared ‘pragmatic’ acupuncture trials: protocol for a systematic review
title Applying the PRECIS-2 tool for self-declared ‘pragmatic’ acupuncture trials: protocol for a systematic review
title_full Applying the PRECIS-2 tool for self-declared ‘pragmatic’ acupuncture trials: protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Applying the PRECIS-2 tool for self-declared ‘pragmatic’ acupuncture trials: protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Applying the PRECIS-2 tool for self-declared ‘pragmatic’ acupuncture trials: protocol for a systematic review
title_short Applying the PRECIS-2 tool for self-declared ‘pragmatic’ acupuncture trials: protocol for a systematic review
title_sort applying the precis-2 tool for self-declared ‘pragmatic’ acupuncture trials: protocol for a systematic review
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9006803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35414545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052861
work_keys_str_mv AT limjinwoong applyingtheprecis2toolforselfdeclaredpragmaticacupuncturetrialsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT leehyeonhoon applyingtheprecis2toolforselfdeclaredpragmaticacupuncturetrialsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT kimyongsuk applyingtheprecis2toolforselfdeclaredpragmaticacupuncturetrialsprotocolforasystematicreview