Cargando…

Comparison of Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry: Osteoporosis Detection Rates in Diabetic Patients

Introduction Diabetes mellitus (DM) adversely affects the skeletal system and is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in osteoporosis detection in patients with DM. Meth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dheeraj, Dheeraj, Chauhan, Udit, Khapre, Meenakshi, Kant, Ravi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9007574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433140
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23131
_version_ 1784686877806166016
author Dheeraj, Dheeraj
Chauhan, Udit
Khapre, Meenakshi
Kant, Ravi
author_facet Dheeraj, Dheeraj
Chauhan, Udit
Khapre, Meenakshi
Kant, Ravi
author_sort Dheeraj, Dheeraj
collection PubMed
description Introduction Diabetes mellitus (DM) adversely affects the skeletal system and is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in osteoporosis detection in patients with DM. Methods A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at the diabetic clinic of a tertiary care teaching hospital in North India. A total of 30 individuals with DM were subjected to spinal QCT and lumbar spine and hip dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios of QCT were measured against DXA and the diagnostic discordance between QCT and DXA was investigated. Results QCT, compared to the gold standard DXA, has a sensitivity/specificity of 92.8% (95% CI 92.4%-93.2%)/81.2% (95% CI 80.6%-81.8%). The PPV/NPV of QCT was 81.2% (95% CI 80.6%-81.8%)/92.8% (95% CI 92.4%-93.2%). The positive likelihood ratio/negative likelihood ratio was 4.95 (95% CI 4.79-5.11)/0.087 (95% CI 0.082-0.093). Area under the curve was 0.871 (95% CI 0.731-1.00). Minor diagnostic discordance was present in 36.6% of patients with diabetes. Conclusion  The current study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of QCT in osteoporosis detection in people with diabetes. DXA is the gold standard diagnostic tool; however, its availability is limited. The current study showed that QCT is an excellent diagnostic tool. Based on these results, this study recommends that QCT may serve as a problem-solving investigation tool where DXA is unavailable, or it may be the primary investigation tool for bone mineral density measurement and osteoporosis detection if a dedicated DXA scanner is inaccessible. This study also recommends further investigating the feasibility of opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine abdominal and chest CT. Finally, considering the silent nature of osteoporosis and the high prevalence of osteoporosis in individuals with diabetes, a proactive approach is required in the screening of osteoporosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9007574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90075742022-04-14 Comparison of Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry: Osteoporosis Detection Rates in Diabetic Patients Dheeraj, Dheeraj Chauhan, Udit Khapre, Meenakshi Kant, Ravi Cureus Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism Introduction Diabetes mellitus (DM) adversely affects the skeletal system and is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in osteoporosis detection in patients with DM. Methods A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at the diabetic clinic of a tertiary care teaching hospital in North India. A total of 30 individuals with DM were subjected to spinal QCT and lumbar spine and hip dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios of QCT were measured against DXA and the diagnostic discordance between QCT and DXA was investigated. Results QCT, compared to the gold standard DXA, has a sensitivity/specificity of 92.8% (95% CI 92.4%-93.2%)/81.2% (95% CI 80.6%-81.8%). The PPV/NPV of QCT was 81.2% (95% CI 80.6%-81.8%)/92.8% (95% CI 92.4%-93.2%). The positive likelihood ratio/negative likelihood ratio was 4.95 (95% CI 4.79-5.11)/0.087 (95% CI 0.082-0.093). Area under the curve was 0.871 (95% CI 0.731-1.00). Minor diagnostic discordance was present in 36.6% of patients with diabetes. Conclusion  The current study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of QCT in osteoporosis detection in people with diabetes. DXA is the gold standard diagnostic tool; however, its availability is limited. The current study showed that QCT is an excellent diagnostic tool. Based on these results, this study recommends that QCT may serve as a problem-solving investigation tool where DXA is unavailable, or it may be the primary investigation tool for bone mineral density measurement and osteoporosis detection if a dedicated DXA scanner is inaccessible. This study also recommends further investigating the feasibility of opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine abdominal and chest CT. Finally, considering the silent nature of osteoporosis and the high prevalence of osteoporosis in individuals with diabetes, a proactive approach is required in the screening of osteoporosis. Cureus 2022-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9007574/ /pubmed/35433140 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23131 Text en Copyright © 2022, Dheeraj et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism
Dheeraj, Dheeraj
Chauhan, Udit
Khapre, Meenakshi
Kant, Ravi
Comparison of Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry: Osteoporosis Detection Rates in Diabetic Patients
title Comparison of Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry: Osteoporosis Detection Rates in Diabetic Patients
title_full Comparison of Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry: Osteoporosis Detection Rates in Diabetic Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry: Osteoporosis Detection Rates in Diabetic Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry: Osteoporosis Detection Rates in Diabetic Patients
title_short Comparison of Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry: Osteoporosis Detection Rates in Diabetic Patients
title_sort comparison of quantitative computed tomography and dual x-ray absorptiometry: osteoporosis detection rates in diabetic patients
topic Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9007574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433140
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23131
work_keys_str_mv AT dheerajdheeraj comparisonofquantitativecomputedtomographyanddualxrayabsorptiometryosteoporosisdetectionratesindiabeticpatients
AT chauhanudit comparisonofquantitativecomputedtomographyanddualxrayabsorptiometryosteoporosisdetectionratesindiabeticpatients
AT khapremeenakshi comparisonofquantitativecomputedtomographyanddualxrayabsorptiometryosteoporosisdetectionratesindiabeticpatients
AT kantravi comparisonofquantitativecomputedtomographyanddualxrayabsorptiometryosteoporosisdetectionratesindiabeticpatients