Cargando…

The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant selection committee meetings have transitioned from in-person to remote video meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic, but how this impacts committee members and patient outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the perceived impact of remote vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shan, Rongzi, Chandra, Neha V, Hsu, Jeffrey J, Fraschilla, Stephanie, Moore, Melissa, Ardehali, Abbas, Nsair, Ali, Parikh, Rushi V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353041
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35490
_version_ 1784687076348788736
author Shan, Rongzi
Chandra, Neha V
Hsu, Jeffrey J
Fraschilla, Stephanie
Moore, Melissa
Ardehali, Abbas
Nsair, Ali
Parikh, Rushi V
author_facet Shan, Rongzi
Chandra, Neha V
Hsu, Jeffrey J
Fraschilla, Stephanie
Moore, Melissa
Ardehali, Abbas
Nsair, Ali
Parikh, Rushi V
author_sort Shan, Rongzi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heart transplant selection committee meetings have transitioned from in-person to remote video meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic, but how this impacts committee members and patient outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the perceived impact of remote video transplant selection meetings on usability and patient care and to measure patient selection outcomes during the transition period from in-person to virtual meetings. METHODS: A 35-item anonymous survey was developed and distributed electronically to the heart transplant selection committee. We reviewed medical records to compare the outcomes of patients presented at in-person meetings (January-March 2020) to those presented during video meetings (March-June 2020). RESULTS: Among 83 committee members queried, 50 were regular attendees. Of the 50 regular attendees, 24 (48%) were physicians and 26 (52%) were nonphysicians, including nurses, social workers, and coordinators; 46 responses were received, 23 (50%) from physicians and 23 (50%) from nonphysicians, with 41 responses fully completed. Overall, respondents were satisfied with the videoconference format and felt that video meetings did not impact patient care and were an acceptable alternative to in-person meetings. However, 54% (22/41) preferred in-person meetings, with 71% (15/21) of nonphysicians preferring in-person meetings compared to only 35% (7/20) of physicians (P=.02). Of the 46 new patient evaluations presented, there was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward fewer patients initially declined at video meetings compared with in-person meetings (6/24, 25% compared to 10/22, 45%; P=.32). CONCLUSIONS: The transition from in-person to video heart transplant selection committee meetings was well-received and did not appear to affect committee members’ perceived ability to deliver patient care. Patient selection outcomes were similar between meeting modalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9008536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90085362022-04-15 The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study Shan, Rongzi Chandra, Neha V Hsu, Jeffrey J Fraschilla, Stephanie Moore, Melissa Ardehali, Abbas Nsair, Ali Parikh, Rushi V JMIR Cardio Original Paper BACKGROUND: Heart transplant selection committee meetings have transitioned from in-person to remote video meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic, but how this impacts committee members and patient outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the perceived impact of remote video transplant selection meetings on usability and patient care and to measure patient selection outcomes during the transition period from in-person to virtual meetings. METHODS: A 35-item anonymous survey was developed and distributed electronically to the heart transplant selection committee. We reviewed medical records to compare the outcomes of patients presented at in-person meetings (January-March 2020) to those presented during video meetings (March-June 2020). RESULTS: Among 83 committee members queried, 50 were regular attendees. Of the 50 regular attendees, 24 (48%) were physicians and 26 (52%) were nonphysicians, including nurses, social workers, and coordinators; 46 responses were received, 23 (50%) from physicians and 23 (50%) from nonphysicians, with 41 responses fully completed. Overall, respondents were satisfied with the videoconference format and felt that video meetings did not impact patient care and were an acceptable alternative to in-person meetings. However, 54% (22/41) preferred in-person meetings, with 71% (15/21) of nonphysicians preferring in-person meetings compared to only 35% (7/20) of physicians (P=.02). Of the 46 new patient evaluations presented, there was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward fewer patients initially declined at video meetings compared with in-person meetings (6/24, 25% compared to 10/22, 45%; P=.32). CONCLUSIONS: The transition from in-person to video heart transplant selection committee meetings was well-received and did not appear to affect committee members’ perceived ability to deliver patient care. Patient selection outcomes were similar between meeting modalities. JMIR Publications 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9008536/ /pubmed/35353041 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35490 Text en ©Rongzi Shan, Neha V Chandra, Jeffrey J Hsu, Stephanie Fraschilla, Melissa Moore, Abbas Ardehali, Ali Nsair, Rushi V Parikh. Originally published in JMIR Cardio (https://cardio.jmir.org), 30.03.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Cardio, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://cardio.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Shan, Rongzi
Chandra, Neha V
Hsu, Jeffrey J
Fraschilla, Stephanie
Moore, Melissa
Ardehali, Abbas
Nsair, Ali
Parikh, Rushi V
The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study
title The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study
title_full The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study
title_fullStr The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study
title_short The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study
title_sort impact of transitioning from in-person to virtual heart transplantation selection committee meetings: observational study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353041
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35490
work_keys_str_mv AT shanrongzi theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT chandranehav theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT hsujeffreyj theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT fraschillastephanie theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT mooremelissa theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT ardehaliabbas theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT nsairali theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT parikhrushiv theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT shanrongzi impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT chandranehav impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT hsujeffreyj impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT fraschillastephanie impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT mooremelissa impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT ardehaliabbas impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT nsairali impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy
AT parikhrushiv impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy