Cargando…
The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study
BACKGROUND: Heart transplant selection committee meetings have transitioned from in-person to remote video meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic, but how this impacts committee members and patient outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the perceived impact of remote vi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353041 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35490 |
_version_ | 1784687076348788736 |
---|---|
author | Shan, Rongzi Chandra, Neha V Hsu, Jeffrey J Fraschilla, Stephanie Moore, Melissa Ardehali, Abbas Nsair, Ali Parikh, Rushi V |
author_facet | Shan, Rongzi Chandra, Neha V Hsu, Jeffrey J Fraschilla, Stephanie Moore, Melissa Ardehali, Abbas Nsair, Ali Parikh, Rushi V |
author_sort | Shan, Rongzi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Heart transplant selection committee meetings have transitioned from in-person to remote video meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic, but how this impacts committee members and patient outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the perceived impact of remote video transplant selection meetings on usability and patient care and to measure patient selection outcomes during the transition period from in-person to virtual meetings. METHODS: A 35-item anonymous survey was developed and distributed electronically to the heart transplant selection committee. We reviewed medical records to compare the outcomes of patients presented at in-person meetings (January-March 2020) to those presented during video meetings (March-June 2020). RESULTS: Among 83 committee members queried, 50 were regular attendees. Of the 50 regular attendees, 24 (48%) were physicians and 26 (52%) were nonphysicians, including nurses, social workers, and coordinators; 46 responses were received, 23 (50%) from physicians and 23 (50%) from nonphysicians, with 41 responses fully completed. Overall, respondents were satisfied with the videoconference format and felt that video meetings did not impact patient care and were an acceptable alternative to in-person meetings. However, 54% (22/41) preferred in-person meetings, with 71% (15/21) of nonphysicians preferring in-person meetings compared to only 35% (7/20) of physicians (P=.02). Of the 46 new patient evaluations presented, there was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward fewer patients initially declined at video meetings compared with in-person meetings (6/24, 25% compared to 10/22, 45%; P=.32). CONCLUSIONS: The transition from in-person to video heart transplant selection committee meetings was well-received and did not appear to affect committee members’ perceived ability to deliver patient care. Patient selection outcomes were similar between meeting modalities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9008536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90085362022-04-15 The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study Shan, Rongzi Chandra, Neha V Hsu, Jeffrey J Fraschilla, Stephanie Moore, Melissa Ardehali, Abbas Nsair, Ali Parikh, Rushi V JMIR Cardio Original Paper BACKGROUND: Heart transplant selection committee meetings have transitioned from in-person to remote video meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic, but how this impacts committee members and patient outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the perceived impact of remote video transplant selection meetings on usability and patient care and to measure patient selection outcomes during the transition period from in-person to virtual meetings. METHODS: A 35-item anonymous survey was developed and distributed electronically to the heart transplant selection committee. We reviewed medical records to compare the outcomes of patients presented at in-person meetings (January-March 2020) to those presented during video meetings (March-June 2020). RESULTS: Among 83 committee members queried, 50 were regular attendees. Of the 50 regular attendees, 24 (48%) were physicians and 26 (52%) were nonphysicians, including nurses, social workers, and coordinators; 46 responses were received, 23 (50%) from physicians and 23 (50%) from nonphysicians, with 41 responses fully completed. Overall, respondents were satisfied with the videoconference format and felt that video meetings did not impact patient care and were an acceptable alternative to in-person meetings. However, 54% (22/41) preferred in-person meetings, with 71% (15/21) of nonphysicians preferring in-person meetings compared to only 35% (7/20) of physicians (P=.02). Of the 46 new patient evaluations presented, there was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward fewer patients initially declined at video meetings compared with in-person meetings (6/24, 25% compared to 10/22, 45%; P=.32). CONCLUSIONS: The transition from in-person to video heart transplant selection committee meetings was well-received and did not appear to affect committee members’ perceived ability to deliver patient care. Patient selection outcomes were similar between meeting modalities. JMIR Publications 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9008536/ /pubmed/35353041 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35490 Text en ©Rongzi Shan, Neha V Chandra, Jeffrey J Hsu, Stephanie Fraschilla, Melissa Moore, Abbas Ardehali, Ali Nsair, Rushi V Parikh. Originally published in JMIR Cardio (https://cardio.jmir.org), 30.03.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Cardio, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://cardio.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Shan, Rongzi Chandra, Neha V Hsu, Jeffrey J Fraschilla, Stephanie Moore, Melissa Ardehali, Abbas Nsair, Ali Parikh, Rushi V The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study |
title | The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study |
title_full | The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study |
title_short | The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study |
title_sort | impact of transitioning from in-person to virtual heart transplantation selection committee meetings: observational study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353041 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shanrongzi theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT chandranehav theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT hsujeffreyj theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT fraschillastephanie theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT mooremelissa theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT ardehaliabbas theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT nsairali theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT parikhrushiv theimpactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT shanrongzi impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT chandranehav impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT hsujeffreyj impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT fraschillastephanie impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT mooremelissa impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT ardehaliabbas impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT nsairali impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy AT parikhrushiv impactoftransitioningfrominpersontovirtualhearttransplantationselectioncommitteemeetingsobservationalstudy |