Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine vs. Oral Chloral Hydrate for Sedation in Children Undergoing Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the sedative efficacy and safety of intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine (DEX) compared with oral chloral hydrate for Computed tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examination in Children. METHODS: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase...
Autores principales: | Lyu, Xiaoqian, Tao, Yujuan, Dang, Xiujing |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433538 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.872900 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is intranasal dexmedetomidine superior to oral chloral hydrate for procedural sedation in children: A systematic review
por: Delvi, Mohamed B.
Publicado: (2022) -
Reflections on: “Is intranasal dexmedetomidine superior to oral chloral hydrate for procedural sedation in children: A systematic review”
por: Sethuraman, Raghuraman M.
Publicado: (2022) -
Efficacy of Chloral Hydrate-Hydroxyzine and Chloral Hydrate-Midazolam in Pediatric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sedation
por: FALLAH, Razieh, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral chloral hydrate for diagnostic procedures sedation in infants and toddlers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Li, Linji, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Using intranasal dexmedetomidine with buccal midazolam for magnetic resonance imaging sedation in children: A single-arm prospective interventional study
por: Li, Bi Lian, et al.
Publicado: (2022)