Cargando…

Change in timing of induction protocol in nulliparous women to optimise timing of birth: results from a single centre study

BACKGROUND: Induction of labour (IOL) is a common obstetric intervention. When planning IOL, especially in women at risk for complications at delivery, the aim should be for delivery to occur when senior staff are available to optimise safe care. METHODS: A change in timing of IOL protocol at our in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slade, Laura, Digance, Georgina, Bradley, Angela, Woodman, Richard, Grivell, Rosalie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35418020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04663-6
_version_ 1784687162217725952
author Slade, Laura
Digance, Georgina
Bradley, Angela
Woodman, Richard
Grivell, Rosalie
author_facet Slade, Laura
Digance, Georgina
Bradley, Angela
Woodman, Richard
Grivell, Rosalie
author_sort Slade, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Induction of labour (IOL) is a common obstetric intervention. When planning IOL, especially in women at risk for complications at delivery, the aim should be for delivery to occur when senior staff are available to optimise safe care. METHODS: A change in timing of IOL protocol at our institution was introduced in November 2018 aiming to increase births occurring “in-hours” defined as 08:00 to 20:00 h. This retrospective cohort study compares the odds of “in-hours” birth before and after the intervention and the association on birth outcomes. The study compared outcomes during the new IOL pathway period to a historical birth cohort from January to December 2017. Inclusion criteria were nulliparous women undergoing planned IOL at term with a cephalic singleton pregnancy. Logistic regression was used to compare odds of in-hours birth for the 2 periods with adjustment for maternal age at delivery, gestation, more than 2 cervical ripening agents required, undergoing IOL for post-dates pregnancy, mode of birth, whether or not IOL proceeded according to planned protocol and missing values using multiple imputation. RESULTS: The rate of deliveries occurring in-hours were higher following the intervention; n = 118/285 (45.6%) pre-intervention versus n = 251/470 (53.4%) post-intervention; adjusted OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.07–2.01, p = 0.02). The percentage of caesarean sections (CS) occurring in-hours was significantly lower in the pre-intervention group n = 71/153 (28.3%) compared with the post intervention group = 35/132(46.4%) (p < 0.001)). The rate of CS was higher in the pre intervention n = 132/285(46.3%) compared with the post intervention group n = 153/470 (32.4%)). CONCLUSIONS: The change in induction procedures was associated with a significantly higher rate of births occurring in-hours and a lower rate of overall of CS. This policy change led to a better pattern of timing of birth for nulliparous women undergoing IOL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9008892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90088922022-04-15 Change in timing of induction protocol in nulliparous women to optimise timing of birth: results from a single centre study Slade, Laura Digance, Georgina Bradley, Angela Woodman, Richard Grivell, Rosalie BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Induction of labour (IOL) is a common obstetric intervention. When planning IOL, especially in women at risk for complications at delivery, the aim should be for delivery to occur when senior staff are available to optimise safe care. METHODS: A change in timing of IOL protocol at our institution was introduced in November 2018 aiming to increase births occurring “in-hours” defined as 08:00 to 20:00 h. This retrospective cohort study compares the odds of “in-hours” birth before and after the intervention and the association on birth outcomes. The study compared outcomes during the new IOL pathway period to a historical birth cohort from January to December 2017. Inclusion criteria were nulliparous women undergoing planned IOL at term with a cephalic singleton pregnancy. Logistic regression was used to compare odds of in-hours birth for the 2 periods with adjustment for maternal age at delivery, gestation, more than 2 cervical ripening agents required, undergoing IOL for post-dates pregnancy, mode of birth, whether or not IOL proceeded according to planned protocol and missing values using multiple imputation. RESULTS: The rate of deliveries occurring in-hours were higher following the intervention; n = 118/285 (45.6%) pre-intervention versus n = 251/470 (53.4%) post-intervention; adjusted OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.07–2.01, p = 0.02). The percentage of caesarean sections (CS) occurring in-hours was significantly lower in the pre-intervention group n = 71/153 (28.3%) compared with the post intervention group = 35/132(46.4%) (p < 0.001)). The rate of CS was higher in the pre intervention n = 132/285(46.3%) compared with the post intervention group n = 153/470 (32.4%)). CONCLUSIONS: The change in induction procedures was associated with a significantly higher rate of births occurring in-hours and a lower rate of overall of CS. This policy change led to a better pattern of timing of birth for nulliparous women undergoing IOL. BioMed Central 2022-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9008892/ /pubmed/35418020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04663-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Slade, Laura
Digance, Georgina
Bradley, Angela
Woodman, Richard
Grivell, Rosalie
Change in timing of induction protocol in nulliparous women to optimise timing of birth: results from a single centre study
title Change in timing of induction protocol in nulliparous women to optimise timing of birth: results from a single centre study
title_full Change in timing of induction protocol in nulliparous women to optimise timing of birth: results from a single centre study
title_fullStr Change in timing of induction protocol in nulliparous women to optimise timing of birth: results from a single centre study
title_full_unstemmed Change in timing of induction protocol in nulliparous women to optimise timing of birth: results from a single centre study
title_short Change in timing of induction protocol in nulliparous women to optimise timing of birth: results from a single centre study
title_sort change in timing of induction protocol in nulliparous women to optimise timing of birth: results from a single centre study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35418020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04663-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sladelaura changeintimingofinductionprotocolinnulliparouswomentooptimisetimingofbirthresultsfromasinglecentrestudy
AT digancegeorgina changeintimingofinductionprotocolinnulliparouswomentooptimisetimingofbirthresultsfromasinglecentrestudy
AT bradleyangela changeintimingofinductionprotocolinnulliparouswomentooptimisetimingofbirthresultsfromasinglecentrestudy
AT woodmanrichard changeintimingofinductionprotocolinnulliparouswomentooptimisetimingofbirthresultsfromasinglecentrestudy
AT grivellrosalie changeintimingofinductionprotocolinnulliparouswomentooptimisetimingofbirthresultsfromasinglecentrestudy