Cargando…

Patients exposed to vancomycin-resistant enterococci during in-hospital outbreaks in a low endemic setting: a proposal for risk-based screening

BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of screening of contact patients (CoPat) after exposure to patients infected or colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) remains controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively developed a new risk stratification for screening patients exposed to VRE, based on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Büchler, Andrea C., Ragozzino, Silvio, Wicki, Melanie, Spaniol, Violeta, Jäger, Sammy, Seth-Smith, Helena M. B., Goldenberger, Daniel, Hinic, Vladimira, Egli, Adrian, Frei, Reno, Widmer, Andreas F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35418099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01089-9
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of screening of contact patients (CoPat) after exposure to patients infected or colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) remains controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively developed a new risk stratification for screening patients exposed to VRE, based on data from three outbreaks—two with Enterococcus faecium vanB and one with Enterococcus faecium vanA involving 1096 CoPat—in a low endemic setting. We classified them into four risk groups: three on environmental exposure, one by healthcare exposure: high (sharing the same room/bathroom with a VRE-colonized patient), medium (hospitalization in the same room after a VRE-colonized patient’s discharge until terminal disinfection including ultraviolet C (UVc)-disinfection), low (hospitalized in the same room within three weeks before the VRE-colonized patient), and “staff” (screening of patients having the same medical care team). RESULTS: VRE-transmission occurred in 7.9% in the high-risk group compared to 0.6% and 0% in the medium and low risk groups. There was a significant trend to higher rates of transmission by risk level of exposure (p < 0.001). In the “staff” group, VRE transmission rate was 2.3%. CONCLUSION: Based on this stratification, we recommend to focus screening of exposed CoPat on the high-risk and “staff” group, saving resources and costs, but larger studies will allow to further improve the yield of VRE screening in the outbreak setting.