Cargando…
Patients exposed to vancomycin-resistant enterococci during in-hospital outbreaks in a low endemic setting: a proposal for risk-based screening
BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of screening of contact patients (CoPat) after exposure to patients infected or colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) remains controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively developed a new risk stratification for screening patients exposed to VRE, based on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35418099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01089-9 |
_version_ | 1784687171649667072 |
---|---|
author | Büchler, Andrea C. Ragozzino, Silvio Wicki, Melanie Spaniol, Violeta Jäger, Sammy Seth-Smith, Helena M. B. Goldenberger, Daniel Hinic, Vladimira Egli, Adrian Frei, Reno Widmer, Andreas F. |
author_facet | Büchler, Andrea C. Ragozzino, Silvio Wicki, Melanie Spaniol, Violeta Jäger, Sammy Seth-Smith, Helena M. B. Goldenberger, Daniel Hinic, Vladimira Egli, Adrian Frei, Reno Widmer, Andreas F. |
author_sort | Büchler, Andrea C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of screening of contact patients (CoPat) after exposure to patients infected or colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) remains controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively developed a new risk stratification for screening patients exposed to VRE, based on data from three outbreaks—two with Enterococcus faecium vanB and one with Enterococcus faecium vanA involving 1096 CoPat—in a low endemic setting. We classified them into four risk groups: three on environmental exposure, one by healthcare exposure: high (sharing the same room/bathroom with a VRE-colonized patient), medium (hospitalization in the same room after a VRE-colonized patient’s discharge until terminal disinfection including ultraviolet C (UVc)-disinfection), low (hospitalized in the same room within three weeks before the VRE-colonized patient), and “staff” (screening of patients having the same medical care team). RESULTS: VRE-transmission occurred in 7.9% in the high-risk group compared to 0.6% and 0% in the medium and low risk groups. There was a significant trend to higher rates of transmission by risk level of exposure (p < 0.001). In the “staff” group, VRE transmission rate was 2.3%. CONCLUSION: Based on this stratification, we recommend to focus screening of exposed CoPat on the high-risk and “staff” group, saving resources and costs, but larger studies will allow to further improve the yield of VRE screening in the outbreak setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9008949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90089492022-04-15 Patients exposed to vancomycin-resistant enterococci during in-hospital outbreaks in a low endemic setting: a proposal for risk-based screening Büchler, Andrea C. Ragozzino, Silvio Wicki, Melanie Spaniol, Violeta Jäger, Sammy Seth-Smith, Helena M. B. Goldenberger, Daniel Hinic, Vladimira Egli, Adrian Frei, Reno Widmer, Andreas F. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of screening of contact patients (CoPat) after exposure to patients infected or colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) remains controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively developed a new risk stratification for screening patients exposed to VRE, based on data from three outbreaks—two with Enterococcus faecium vanB and one with Enterococcus faecium vanA involving 1096 CoPat—in a low endemic setting. We classified them into four risk groups: three on environmental exposure, one by healthcare exposure: high (sharing the same room/bathroom with a VRE-colonized patient), medium (hospitalization in the same room after a VRE-colonized patient’s discharge until terminal disinfection including ultraviolet C (UVc)-disinfection), low (hospitalized in the same room within three weeks before the VRE-colonized patient), and “staff” (screening of patients having the same medical care team). RESULTS: VRE-transmission occurred in 7.9% in the high-risk group compared to 0.6% and 0% in the medium and low risk groups. There was a significant trend to higher rates of transmission by risk level of exposure (p < 0.001). In the “staff” group, VRE transmission rate was 2.3%. CONCLUSION: Based on this stratification, we recommend to focus screening of exposed CoPat on the high-risk and “staff” group, saving resources and costs, but larger studies will allow to further improve the yield of VRE screening in the outbreak setting. BioMed Central 2022-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9008949/ /pubmed/35418099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01089-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Büchler, Andrea C. Ragozzino, Silvio Wicki, Melanie Spaniol, Violeta Jäger, Sammy Seth-Smith, Helena M. B. Goldenberger, Daniel Hinic, Vladimira Egli, Adrian Frei, Reno Widmer, Andreas F. Patients exposed to vancomycin-resistant enterococci during in-hospital outbreaks in a low endemic setting: a proposal for risk-based screening |
title | Patients exposed to vancomycin-resistant enterococci during in-hospital outbreaks in a low endemic setting: a proposal for risk-based screening |
title_full | Patients exposed to vancomycin-resistant enterococci during in-hospital outbreaks in a low endemic setting: a proposal for risk-based screening |
title_fullStr | Patients exposed to vancomycin-resistant enterococci during in-hospital outbreaks in a low endemic setting: a proposal for risk-based screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients exposed to vancomycin-resistant enterococci during in-hospital outbreaks in a low endemic setting: a proposal for risk-based screening |
title_short | Patients exposed to vancomycin-resistant enterococci during in-hospital outbreaks in a low endemic setting: a proposal for risk-based screening |
title_sort | patients exposed to vancomycin-resistant enterococci during in-hospital outbreaks in a low endemic setting: a proposal for risk-based screening |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35418099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01089-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buchlerandreac patientsexposedtovancomycinresistantenterococciduringinhospitaloutbreaksinalowendemicsettingaproposalforriskbasedscreening AT ragozzinosilvio patientsexposedtovancomycinresistantenterococciduringinhospitaloutbreaksinalowendemicsettingaproposalforriskbasedscreening AT wickimelanie patientsexposedtovancomycinresistantenterococciduringinhospitaloutbreaksinalowendemicsettingaproposalforriskbasedscreening AT spaniolvioleta patientsexposedtovancomycinresistantenterococciduringinhospitaloutbreaksinalowendemicsettingaproposalforriskbasedscreening AT jagersammy patientsexposedtovancomycinresistantenterococciduringinhospitaloutbreaksinalowendemicsettingaproposalforriskbasedscreening AT sethsmithhelenamb patientsexposedtovancomycinresistantenterococciduringinhospitaloutbreaksinalowendemicsettingaproposalforriskbasedscreening AT goldenbergerdaniel patientsexposedtovancomycinresistantenterococciduringinhospitaloutbreaksinalowendemicsettingaproposalforriskbasedscreening AT hinicvladimira patientsexposedtovancomycinresistantenterococciduringinhospitaloutbreaksinalowendemicsettingaproposalforriskbasedscreening AT egliadrian patientsexposedtovancomycinresistantenterococciduringinhospitaloutbreaksinalowendemicsettingaproposalforriskbasedscreening AT freireno patientsexposedtovancomycinresistantenterococciduringinhospitaloutbreaksinalowendemicsettingaproposalforriskbasedscreening AT widmerandreasf patientsexposedtovancomycinresistantenterococciduringinhospitaloutbreaksinalowendemicsettingaproposalforriskbasedscreening |