Cargando…

Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation after laser in situ keratomileusis

BACKGROUND: To assess the multicenter outcomes of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation with a central hole (EVO-ICL, STAAR Surgical) for patients undergoing previous laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: This case series enrolled 31 eyes of 21 consecutive patients undergoi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamiya, Kazutaka, Shimizu, Kimiya, Igarashi, Akihito, Kitazawa, Yoshihiro, Kojima, Takashi, Nakamura, Tomoaki, Ichikawa, Kazuo, Fukuoka, Sachiko, Fujimoto, Kahoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35418146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00282-6
_version_ 1784687175776862208
author Kamiya, Kazutaka
Shimizu, Kimiya
Igarashi, Akihito
Kitazawa, Yoshihiro
Kojima, Takashi
Nakamura, Tomoaki
Ichikawa, Kazuo
Fukuoka, Sachiko
Fujimoto, Kahoko
author_facet Kamiya, Kazutaka
Shimizu, Kimiya
Igarashi, Akihito
Kitazawa, Yoshihiro
Kojima, Takashi
Nakamura, Tomoaki
Ichikawa, Kazuo
Fukuoka, Sachiko
Fujimoto, Kahoko
author_sort Kamiya, Kazutaka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the multicenter outcomes of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation with a central hole (EVO-ICL, STAAR Surgical) for patients undergoing previous laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: This case series enrolled 31 eyes of 21 consecutive patients undergoing EVO-ICL implantation to correct residual refractive errors after LASIK at 7 nationwide major surgical sites. We investigated safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and adverse events at 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, and at the final visit. RESULTS: The mean observation period was 1.6 ± 1.8 years. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities were − 0.14 ± 0.11 and − 0.22 ± 0.09 logMAR at 6 months postoperatively. At 6 months postoperatively, 81% and 100% of eyes were within ± 0.5 D and ± 1.0 D, respectively, of the targeted correction. We found neither significant manifest refraction changes of 0.05 ± 0.38 D from 1 week to 6 months nor apparent intraoperative or postoperative complications in any case. CONCLUSIONS: Our multicenter study confirmed that the EVO-ICL provided good outcomes in safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability, even in post-LASIK eyes. Therefore, EVO-ICL implantation may be a viable surgical option, even for correcting residual refractive errors after LASIK. Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (000045295). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40662-022-00282-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9008970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90089702022-04-15 Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation after laser in situ keratomileusis Kamiya, Kazutaka Shimizu, Kimiya Igarashi, Akihito Kitazawa, Yoshihiro Kojima, Takashi Nakamura, Tomoaki Ichikawa, Kazuo Fukuoka, Sachiko Fujimoto, Kahoko Eye Vis (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: To assess the multicenter outcomes of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation with a central hole (EVO-ICL, STAAR Surgical) for patients undergoing previous laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: This case series enrolled 31 eyes of 21 consecutive patients undergoing EVO-ICL implantation to correct residual refractive errors after LASIK at 7 nationwide major surgical sites. We investigated safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and adverse events at 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, and at the final visit. RESULTS: The mean observation period was 1.6 ± 1.8 years. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities were − 0.14 ± 0.11 and − 0.22 ± 0.09 logMAR at 6 months postoperatively. At 6 months postoperatively, 81% and 100% of eyes were within ± 0.5 D and ± 1.0 D, respectively, of the targeted correction. We found neither significant manifest refraction changes of 0.05 ± 0.38 D from 1 week to 6 months nor apparent intraoperative or postoperative complications in any case. CONCLUSIONS: Our multicenter study confirmed that the EVO-ICL provided good outcomes in safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability, even in post-LASIK eyes. Therefore, EVO-ICL implantation may be a viable surgical option, even for correcting residual refractive errors after LASIK. Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (000045295). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40662-022-00282-6. BioMed Central 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9008970/ /pubmed/35418146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00282-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kamiya, Kazutaka
Shimizu, Kimiya
Igarashi, Akihito
Kitazawa, Yoshihiro
Kojima, Takashi
Nakamura, Tomoaki
Ichikawa, Kazuo
Fukuoka, Sachiko
Fujimoto, Kahoko
Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation after laser in situ keratomileusis
title Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation after laser in situ keratomileusis
title_full Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation after laser in situ keratomileusis
title_fullStr Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation after laser in situ keratomileusis
title_full_unstemmed Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation after laser in situ keratomileusis
title_short Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation after laser in situ keratomileusis
title_sort posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation after laser in situ keratomileusis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35418146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00282-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kamiyakazutaka posteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensimplantationafterlaserinsitukeratomileusis
AT shimizukimiya posteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensimplantationafterlaserinsitukeratomileusis
AT igarashiakihito posteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensimplantationafterlaserinsitukeratomileusis
AT kitazawayoshihiro posteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensimplantationafterlaserinsitukeratomileusis
AT kojimatakashi posteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensimplantationafterlaserinsitukeratomileusis
AT nakamuratomoaki posteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensimplantationafterlaserinsitukeratomileusis
AT ichikawakazuo posteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensimplantationafterlaserinsitukeratomileusis
AT fukuokasachiko posteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensimplantationafterlaserinsitukeratomileusis
AT fujimotokahoko posteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensimplantationafterlaserinsitukeratomileusis
AT posteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensimplantationafterlaserinsitukeratomileusis