Cargando…
Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China
The evaluation of tourism competitiveness is an important tool for analyzing the potential of tourism in a specific context. Enshi Autonomous Prefecture (EAP) in China is selected as a case through which to explore the potential of mountain tourism and its competitiveness in the tourism industry. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35432101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809314 |
_version_ | 1784687190926688256 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Qian Sarker, Md Nazirul Islam Zhang, Dian Sun, Jiangyan Xiong, Teng Ding, Jieying |
author_facet | Cao, Qian Sarker, Md Nazirul Islam Zhang, Dian Sun, Jiangyan Xiong, Teng Ding, Jieying |
author_sort | Cao, Qian |
collection | PubMed |
description | The evaluation of tourism competitiveness is an important tool for analyzing the potential of tourism in a specific context. Enshi Autonomous Prefecture (EAP) in China is selected as a case through which to explore the potential of mountain tourism and its competitiveness in the tourism industry. This study develops EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness model focusing on three criteria: core competitiveness of mountain tourism, the economic environment’s competitiveness, and infrastructure competitiveness. Context-specific customized evaluation index has been applied to data collected from EAP Statistical Yearbook for 2005–2014. The study reveals that the value of EAP’s mountain tourism core competitiveness, economic and environmental competitiveness, and infrastructure competitiveness are 84.292, 13.4, and 2.308%, respectively. When tourism core competitiveness is increased by one unit, EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness will increase by 0.84292 units. Similarly, when economic environment competitiveness is increased by one unit, EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness will increase by 0.134 units. EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness increases by 0.02308 units when infrastructure competitiveness increases by one unit. The major reasons for low levels of competitiveness were lack of awareness of the county authority, a low level of cooperation, and weak infrastructure. The recommendations from the study’s findings are as follows. Firstly, the county authority should appropriately improve the relationship between competition and cooperation, maintaining cooperation in competition, and competition in cooperation. Secondly, the county authority should strengthen communication by establishing an effective coordinated mechanism. Thirdly, the county authority should improve the sense of cooperation and jointly develop the mountain tourism market. Fourthly, the county authority should improve the construction of tourism infrastructure and break down the barriers to tourism cooperation. The study’s findings help develop a “win-win” cooperation mechanism within the competition and support the sustainable development of the mountain tourism industry while reducing poverty and promoting the revitalization of the mountains of China. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9009045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90090452022-04-15 Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China Cao, Qian Sarker, Md Nazirul Islam Zhang, Dian Sun, Jiangyan Xiong, Teng Ding, Jieying Front Psychol Psychology The evaluation of tourism competitiveness is an important tool for analyzing the potential of tourism in a specific context. Enshi Autonomous Prefecture (EAP) in China is selected as a case through which to explore the potential of mountain tourism and its competitiveness in the tourism industry. This study develops EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness model focusing on three criteria: core competitiveness of mountain tourism, the economic environment’s competitiveness, and infrastructure competitiveness. Context-specific customized evaluation index has been applied to data collected from EAP Statistical Yearbook for 2005–2014. The study reveals that the value of EAP’s mountain tourism core competitiveness, economic and environmental competitiveness, and infrastructure competitiveness are 84.292, 13.4, and 2.308%, respectively. When tourism core competitiveness is increased by one unit, EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness will increase by 0.84292 units. Similarly, when economic environment competitiveness is increased by one unit, EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness will increase by 0.134 units. EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness increases by 0.02308 units when infrastructure competitiveness increases by one unit. The major reasons for low levels of competitiveness were lack of awareness of the county authority, a low level of cooperation, and weak infrastructure. The recommendations from the study’s findings are as follows. Firstly, the county authority should appropriately improve the relationship between competition and cooperation, maintaining cooperation in competition, and competition in cooperation. Secondly, the county authority should strengthen communication by establishing an effective coordinated mechanism. Thirdly, the county authority should improve the sense of cooperation and jointly develop the mountain tourism market. Fourthly, the county authority should improve the construction of tourism infrastructure and break down the barriers to tourism cooperation. The study’s findings help develop a “win-win” cooperation mechanism within the competition and support the sustainable development of the mountain tourism industry while reducing poverty and promoting the revitalization of the mountains of China. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9009045/ /pubmed/35432101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809314 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cao, Sarker, Zhang, Sun, Xiong and Ding. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Cao, Qian Sarker, Md Nazirul Islam Zhang, Dian Sun, Jiangyan Xiong, Teng Ding, Jieying Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China |
title | Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China |
title_full | Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China |
title_fullStr | Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China |
title_short | Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China |
title_sort | tourism competitiveness evaluation: evidence from mountain tourism in china |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35432101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caoqian tourismcompetitivenessevaluationevidencefrommountaintourisminchina AT sarkermdnazirulislam tourismcompetitivenessevaluationevidencefrommountaintourisminchina AT zhangdian tourismcompetitivenessevaluationevidencefrommountaintourisminchina AT sunjiangyan tourismcompetitivenessevaluationevidencefrommountaintourisminchina AT xiongteng tourismcompetitivenessevaluationevidencefrommountaintourisminchina AT dingjieying tourismcompetitivenessevaluationevidencefrommountaintourisminchina |