Cargando…

Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China

The evaluation of tourism competitiveness is an important tool for analyzing the potential of tourism in a specific context. Enshi Autonomous Prefecture (EAP) in China is selected as a case through which to explore the potential of mountain tourism and its competitiveness in the tourism industry. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Qian, Sarker, Md Nazirul Islam, Zhang, Dian, Sun, Jiangyan, Xiong, Teng, Ding, Jieying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35432101
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809314
_version_ 1784687190926688256
author Cao, Qian
Sarker, Md Nazirul Islam
Zhang, Dian
Sun, Jiangyan
Xiong, Teng
Ding, Jieying
author_facet Cao, Qian
Sarker, Md Nazirul Islam
Zhang, Dian
Sun, Jiangyan
Xiong, Teng
Ding, Jieying
author_sort Cao, Qian
collection PubMed
description The evaluation of tourism competitiveness is an important tool for analyzing the potential of tourism in a specific context. Enshi Autonomous Prefecture (EAP) in China is selected as a case through which to explore the potential of mountain tourism and its competitiveness in the tourism industry. This study develops EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness model focusing on three criteria: core competitiveness of mountain tourism, the economic environment’s competitiveness, and infrastructure competitiveness. Context-specific customized evaluation index has been applied to data collected from EAP Statistical Yearbook for 2005–2014. The study reveals that the value of EAP’s mountain tourism core competitiveness, economic and environmental competitiveness, and infrastructure competitiveness are 84.292, 13.4, and 2.308%, respectively. When tourism core competitiveness is increased by one unit, EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness will increase by 0.84292 units. Similarly, when economic environment competitiveness is increased by one unit, EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness will increase by 0.134 units. EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness increases by 0.02308 units when infrastructure competitiveness increases by one unit. The major reasons for low levels of competitiveness were lack of awareness of the county authority, a low level of cooperation, and weak infrastructure. The recommendations from the study’s findings are as follows. Firstly, the county authority should appropriately improve the relationship between competition and cooperation, maintaining cooperation in competition, and competition in cooperation. Secondly, the county authority should strengthen communication by establishing an effective coordinated mechanism. Thirdly, the county authority should improve the sense of cooperation and jointly develop the mountain tourism market. Fourthly, the county authority should improve the construction of tourism infrastructure and break down the barriers to tourism cooperation. The study’s findings help develop a “win-win” cooperation mechanism within the competition and support the sustainable development of the mountain tourism industry while reducing poverty and promoting the revitalization of the mountains of China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9009045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90090452022-04-15 Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China Cao, Qian Sarker, Md Nazirul Islam Zhang, Dian Sun, Jiangyan Xiong, Teng Ding, Jieying Front Psychol Psychology The evaluation of tourism competitiveness is an important tool for analyzing the potential of tourism in a specific context. Enshi Autonomous Prefecture (EAP) in China is selected as a case through which to explore the potential of mountain tourism and its competitiveness in the tourism industry. This study develops EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness model focusing on three criteria: core competitiveness of mountain tourism, the economic environment’s competitiveness, and infrastructure competitiveness. Context-specific customized evaluation index has been applied to data collected from EAP Statistical Yearbook for 2005–2014. The study reveals that the value of EAP’s mountain tourism core competitiveness, economic and environmental competitiveness, and infrastructure competitiveness are 84.292, 13.4, and 2.308%, respectively. When tourism core competitiveness is increased by one unit, EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness will increase by 0.84292 units. Similarly, when economic environment competitiveness is increased by one unit, EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness will increase by 0.134 units. EAP’s mountain tourism competitiveness increases by 0.02308 units when infrastructure competitiveness increases by one unit. The major reasons for low levels of competitiveness were lack of awareness of the county authority, a low level of cooperation, and weak infrastructure. The recommendations from the study’s findings are as follows. Firstly, the county authority should appropriately improve the relationship between competition and cooperation, maintaining cooperation in competition, and competition in cooperation. Secondly, the county authority should strengthen communication by establishing an effective coordinated mechanism. Thirdly, the county authority should improve the sense of cooperation and jointly develop the mountain tourism market. Fourthly, the county authority should improve the construction of tourism infrastructure and break down the barriers to tourism cooperation. The study’s findings help develop a “win-win” cooperation mechanism within the competition and support the sustainable development of the mountain tourism industry while reducing poverty and promoting the revitalization of the mountains of China. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9009045/ /pubmed/35432101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809314 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cao, Sarker, Zhang, Sun, Xiong and Ding. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Cao, Qian
Sarker, Md Nazirul Islam
Zhang, Dian
Sun, Jiangyan
Xiong, Teng
Ding, Jieying
Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China
title Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China
title_full Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China
title_fullStr Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China
title_full_unstemmed Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China
title_short Tourism Competitiveness Evaluation: Evidence From Mountain Tourism in China
title_sort tourism competitiveness evaluation: evidence from mountain tourism in china
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35432101
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809314
work_keys_str_mv AT caoqian tourismcompetitivenessevaluationevidencefrommountaintourisminchina
AT sarkermdnazirulislam tourismcompetitivenessevaluationevidencefrommountaintourisminchina
AT zhangdian tourismcompetitivenessevaluationevidencefrommountaintourisminchina
AT sunjiangyan tourismcompetitivenessevaluationevidencefrommountaintourisminchina
AT xiongteng tourismcompetitivenessevaluationevidencefrommountaintourisminchina
AT dingjieying tourismcompetitivenessevaluationevidencefrommountaintourisminchina