An External Patient Healthcare Index (EPHI) for Simulating Spatial Tendencies in Healthcare Seeking Behavior

BACKGROUND: Healthcare resources are always more limited compared with demand, but better matching supply with demand can improve overall resource efficiency. In countries like China where patients are free to choose healthcare facilities, over-utilization and under-utilization of healthcare resources co-exist because of unreasonable healthcare seeking behavior. However, scholarship regarding the spatial distribution of utilization for healthcare resources, resulting from unreasonable spatial tendencies in healthcare seeking, is rare. METHODS: In this article, we propose a new External Patient Healthcare Index (EPHI) to simulate the spatial distribution of utilization for healthcare resources, based on the Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) method, which is widely used to assess potential spatial accessibility. Instead of using individual-level healthcare utilization data which is difficult to obtain, the EPHI uses institution-level aggregated data, including numbers of inpatient/outpatient visits. By comparing the estimated utilization (based on local healthcare institution services provision) with the expected utilization (based on local population morbidity), guest patients (e.g., patients flowing in for treatment) and bypass patients (patients flowing out) can be identified. To test the applicability of this index, a case study was carried out on China's Hainan Island. The spatial tendencies of patients for inpatient and outpatient services were simulated, then incorporated with spatial access to healthcare resources to evaluate overall resource allocation efficiency, thus guiding future resource allocations and investment for policy makers and healthcare providers. RESULTS: The EPHI revealed that bypass activities widely exist on Hainan Island in both inpatient and outpatient care, with patients tending to travel from less developed regions with fewer healthcare resources to more highly developed regions with more healthcare resources to receive healthcare. Comparison with spatial accessibility demonstrated how bypass activities on Hainan produced an under-utilization of doctors in less developed regions and over-utilization of doctors in more developed coastal regions. CONCLUSIONS: This case study on Hainan Island demonstrates that this new index can very clearly identify both the sources and sinks of patient spatial tendencies. Combining these results with spatial accessibility of healthcare resources, how efficiently the available supply matches the utilization can be revealed, indicating wide-ranging applicability for local governments and policymakers.