Cargando…

Comprehensive Evaluation of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) Spinal Hardware for Proton and Photon Planning

Purpose: To evaluate a novel spine implant, carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK), for proton and photon treatment planning. Materials and Methods: We compared target coverage and sparing of organs-at-risk (OARs) for a spinal phantom with 4 different spine configurations: (a) norma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Chengyu, Lin, Haibo, Huang, Sheng, Xiong, Weijun, Hu, Lei, Choi, Isabelle, Press, Robert, Hasan, Shaakir, Simone, Charles, Chhabra, Arpit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221091700
_version_ 1784687215100559360
author Shi, Chengyu
Lin, Haibo
Huang, Sheng
Xiong, Weijun
Hu, Lei
Choi, Isabelle
Press, Robert
Hasan, Shaakir
Simone, Charles
Chhabra, Arpit
author_facet Shi, Chengyu
Lin, Haibo
Huang, Sheng
Xiong, Weijun
Hu, Lei
Choi, Isabelle
Press, Robert
Hasan, Shaakir
Simone, Charles
Chhabra, Arpit
author_sort Shi, Chengyu
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To evaluate a novel spine implant, carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK), for proton and photon treatment planning. Materials and Methods: We compared target coverage and sparing of organs-at-risk (OARs) for a spinal phantom with 4 different spine configurations: (a) normal (no implant); (b) Titanium; (c) CFR-PEEK; and (d) hybrid (CFR-PEEK with Titanium tulip head). The spinal phantom was imaged via computed tomography (CT) scan, and the iterative Metal Artifact Reduction (iMAR) CT set was used for planning. A representative spinal chordoma target and associated OARs were contoured. The prescription dose was 50 Gy to the initial target volume, followed by a 24 Gy boost, for which multi-field optimization (MFO) proton plans were developed with a 3 mm setup and 3.5% range uncertainties. For photon planning, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were developed for the initial and boost plans. OAR dose constraints were set according to our institutional guidelines. Results: For the 4 spine configurations, the proton plans achieved similar nominal target coverage and OARs sparing. While evaluating coverage and OAR dose under uncertainty scenario analysis for initial clinical target volume (CTV) 50 Gy 95% and 90% coverage, higher means and the narrower band of doses variations were achieved for the normal and CFR-PEEK plans. Similarly, uncertainty analysis of spinal cord D(max) showed tighter distribution for normal and CFR-PEEK plans. Overall plan quality showed no significant difference for photon planning when compared to normal spine versus other inserts. However, for proton planning, there is a larger difference for the normal spine insert scenario versus the Titanium insert scenario. For each insert scenario comparison between photon and proton plans, there was a larger difference for OARs: heart and spinal cord. Conclusion: The CFR-PEEK implant has similar clinical properties to a normal spine for proton planning, allowing us to pass protons through the material and achieve superior target coverage and OAR sparing under nominal and uncertainty conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9009152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90091522022-04-15 Comprehensive Evaluation of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) Spinal Hardware for Proton and Photon Planning Shi, Chengyu Lin, Haibo Huang, Sheng Xiong, Weijun Hu, Lei Choi, Isabelle Press, Robert Hasan, Shaakir Simone, Charles Chhabra, Arpit Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article Purpose: To evaluate a novel spine implant, carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK), for proton and photon treatment planning. Materials and Methods: We compared target coverage and sparing of organs-at-risk (OARs) for a spinal phantom with 4 different spine configurations: (a) normal (no implant); (b) Titanium; (c) CFR-PEEK; and (d) hybrid (CFR-PEEK with Titanium tulip head). The spinal phantom was imaged via computed tomography (CT) scan, and the iterative Metal Artifact Reduction (iMAR) CT set was used for planning. A representative spinal chordoma target and associated OARs were contoured. The prescription dose was 50 Gy to the initial target volume, followed by a 24 Gy boost, for which multi-field optimization (MFO) proton plans were developed with a 3 mm setup and 3.5% range uncertainties. For photon planning, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were developed for the initial and boost plans. OAR dose constraints were set according to our institutional guidelines. Results: For the 4 spine configurations, the proton plans achieved similar nominal target coverage and OARs sparing. While evaluating coverage and OAR dose under uncertainty scenario analysis for initial clinical target volume (CTV) 50 Gy 95% and 90% coverage, higher means and the narrower band of doses variations were achieved for the normal and CFR-PEEK plans. Similarly, uncertainty analysis of spinal cord D(max) showed tighter distribution for normal and CFR-PEEK plans. Overall plan quality showed no significant difference for photon planning when compared to normal spine versus other inserts. However, for proton planning, there is a larger difference for the normal spine insert scenario versus the Titanium insert scenario. For each insert scenario comparison between photon and proton plans, there was a larger difference for OARs: heart and spinal cord. Conclusion: The CFR-PEEK implant has similar clinical properties to a normal spine for proton planning, allowing us to pass protons through the material and achieve superior target coverage and OAR sparing under nominal and uncertainty conditions. SAGE Publications 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9009152/ /pubmed/35410544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221091700 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Shi, Chengyu
Lin, Haibo
Huang, Sheng
Xiong, Weijun
Hu, Lei
Choi, Isabelle
Press, Robert
Hasan, Shaakir
Simone, Charles
Chhabra, Arpit
Comprehensive Evaluation of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) Spinal Hardware for Proton and Photon Planning
title Comprehensive Evaluation of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) Spinal Hardware for Proton and Photon Planning
title_full Comprehensive Evaluation of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) Spinal Hardware for Proton and Photon Planning
title_fullStr Comprehensive Evaluation of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) Spinal Hardware for Proton and Photon Planning
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Evaluation of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) Spinal Hardware for Proton and Photon Planning
title_short Comprehensive Evaluation of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) Spinal Hardware for Proton and Photon Planning
title_sort comprehensive evaluation of carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (cfr-peek) spinal hardware for proton and photon planning
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221091700
work_keys_str_mv AT shichengyu comprehensiveevaluationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketonecfrpeekspinalhardwareforprotonandphotonplanning
AT linhaibo comprehensiveevaluationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketonecfrpeekspinalhardwareforprotonandphotonplanning
AT huangsheng comprehensiveevaluationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketonecfrpeekspinalhardwareforprotonandphotonplanning
AT xiongweijun comprehensiveevaluationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketonecfrpeekspinalhardwareforprotonandphotonplanning
AT hulei comprehensiveevaluationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketonecfrpeekspinalhardwareforprotonandphotonplanning
AT choiisabelle comprehensiveevaluationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketonecfrpeekspinalhardwareforprotonandphotonplanning
AT pressrobert comprehensiveevaluationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketonecfrpeekspinalhardwareforprotonandphotonplanning
AT hasanshaakir comprehensiveevaluationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketonecfrpeekspinalhardwareforprotonandphotonplanning
AT simonecharles comprehensiveevaluationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketonecfrpeekspinalhardwareforprotonandphotonplanning
AT chhabraarpit comprehensiveevaluationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketonecfrpeekspinalhardwareforprotonandphotonplanning