Cargando…

Differences in Glycemic Abnormalities Between Primary Aldosteronism and Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The relationship of glycemic abnormalities between primary aldosteronism (PA) patients and essential hypertension (EH) patients is still debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to explore differences in the prevalence of glycemic abnormalities and levels of abnormal glucose metabolism in PA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manosroi, Worapaka, Atthakomol, Pichitchai, Wattanawitawas, Pittaporn, Buranapin, Supawan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35432215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.870047
_version_ 1784687220274233344
author Manosroi, Worapaka
Atthakomol, Pichitchai
Wattanawitawas, Pittaporn
Buranapin, Supawan
author_facet Manosroi, Worapaka
Atthakomol, Pichitchai
Wattanawitawas, Pittaporn
Buranapin, Supawan
author_sort Manosroi, Worapaka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relationship of glycemic abnormalities between primary aldosteronism (PA) patients and essential hypertension (EH) patients is still debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to explore differences in the prevalence of glycemic abnormalities and levels of abnormal glucose metabolism in PA and EH patients. METHODS: A search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Web of Science databases from their inception through January 2022. Inclusion criteria for this study were 1) observational studies which contained specific data of interest, 2) studies including data which compared adult PA and EH patients and 3) studies which used appropriate methods to diagnose PA. Risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies involving 53,186 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with PA demonstrated significantly higher overall incidence of glycemic abnormalities than patients with EH [RR 1.54; 95% CI (1.20,1.98)]. Risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in PA patients were higher than in EH patients [RR 1.27; 95%CI (1.08, 1.49) and RR 2.99; 95%CI (1.74, 5.16), respectively]. There was no statistically significant difference of risk between these groups for impaired fasting glucose (IFG) [RR 1.70; 95%CI (0.55, 5.26)]. Moderate heterogeneity was observed in overall glycemic abnormalities outcomes. A high level of heterogeneity was observed for IFG, while the level was low for DM and IGT. CONCLUSIONS: PA patients have a higher risk of glycemic abnormalities than in EH patients. Further study should be conducted to investigate underlying mechanisms of glycemic abnormalities in PA. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: www.inplasy.com, INPLASY, identifier 202220004.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9009178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90091782022-04-15 Differences in Glycemic Abnormalities Between Primary Aldosteronism and Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Manosroi, Worapaka Atthakomol, Pichitchai Wattanawitawas, Pittaporn Buranapin, Supawan Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology BACKGROUND: The relationship of glycemic abnormalities between primary aldosteronism (PA) patients and essential hypertension (EH) patients is still debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to explore differences in the prevalence of glycemic abnormalities and levels of abnormal glucose metabolism in PA and EH patients. METHODS: A search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Web of Science databases from their inception through January 2022. Inclusion criteria for this study were 1) observational studies which contained specific data of interest, 2) studies including data which compared adult PA and EH patients and 3) studies which used appropriate methods to diagnose PA. Risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies involving 53,186 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with PA demonstrated significantly higher overall incidence of glycemic abnormalities than patients with EH [RR 1.54; 95% CI (1.20,1.98)]. Risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in PA patients were higher than in EH patients [RR 1.27; 95%CI (1.08, 1.49) and RR 2.99; 95%CI (1.74, 5.16), respectively]. There was no statistically significant difference of risk between these groups for impaired fasting glucose (IFG) [RR 1.70; 95%CI (0.55, 5.26)]. Moderate heterogeneity was observed in overall glycemic abnormalities outcomes. A high level of heterogeneity was observed for IFG, while the level was low for DM and IGT. CONCLUSIONS: PA patients have a higher risk of glycemic abnormalities than in EH patients. Further study should be conducted to investigate underlying mechanisms of glycemic abnormalities in PA. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: www.inplasy.com, INPLASY, identifier 202220004. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9009178/ /pubmed/35432215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.870047 Text en Copyright © 2022 Manosroi, Atthakomol, Wattanawitawas and Buranapin https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Manosroi, Worapaka
Atthakomol, Pichitchai
Wattanawitawas, Pittaporn
Buranapin, Supawan
Differences in Glycemic Abnormalities Between Primary Aldosteronism and Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Differences in Glycemic Abnormalities Between Primary Aldosteronism and Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Differences in Glycemic Abnormalities Between Primary Aldosteronism and Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Differences in Glycemic Abnormalities Between Primary Aldosteronism and Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Glycemic Abnormalities Between Primary Aldosteronism and Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Differences in Glycemic Abnormalities Between Primary Aldosteronism and Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort differences in glycemic abnormalities between primary aldosteronism and essential hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35432215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.870047
work_keys_str_mv AT manosroiworapaka differencesinglycemicabnormalitiesbetweenprimaryaldosteronismandessentialhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT atthakomolpichitchai differencesinglycemicabnormalitiesbetweenprimaryaldosteronismandessentialhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wattanawitawaspittaporn differencesinglycemicabnormalitiesbetweenprimaryaldosteronismandessentialhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT buranapinsupawan differencesinglycemicabnormalitiesbetweenprimaryaldosteronismandessentialhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis