Cargando…

Transcerebellar diameter versus biparietal diameter for the measurement of gestational age in third trimester

AIM: To compare the accuracy of biparietal diameter and transcerebellar diameter in measuring the gestational age during the third trimester of pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 275 pregnant women with singleton pregnancy between 32 and 37 weeks gestational ag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, Mohamed Adel, AbdElSalam NasrElDin, Eman, Moussa, Mahmoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449695
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2022.0007
_version_ 1784687247317008384
author Ali, Mohamed Adel
AbdElSalam NasrElDin, Eman
Moussa, Mahmoud
author_facet Ali, Mohamed Adel
AbdElSalam NasrElDin, Eman
Moussa, Mahmoud
author_sort Ali, Mohamed Adel
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the accuracy of biparietal diameter and transcerebellar diameter in measuring the gestational age during the third trimester of pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 275 pregnant women with singleton pregnancy between 32 and 37 weeks gestational age were recruited from the outpatient clinics of both Helwan University Hospital and Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, during the period from February 2021 to August 2021. Transcerebellar and biparietal diameters of the fetus were measured by a radiologist blinded to the women’s gestational age, and compared to the gestational age acquired from a reliable date of first day of last menstrual period. RESULTS: The gestational age calculated by first day of last menstrual period ranged from 32 to 37 weeks (34.35 ± 1.4), while estimated by transcerebellar and biparietal diameters ranged from 31 to 37 weeks (34.31 ± 1.39) and 31 to 39 weeks (34.32 ± 1.44), respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between gestational age and transcerebellar diameter (r = 0.98, p <0.001) as well as biparietal diameter (r = 0.87, p <0.001), yet a stronger correlation was with transcerebellar diameter. 93.6% of gestational age assessment by transcerebellar diameter was correct compared to only 79.9% by biparietal diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Transcerebellar diameter is a reliable single sonographic fetal biometric parameter for the assessment of gestational age in third trimester of pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9009340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Medical Communications Sp. z o.o.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90093402022-04-20 Transcerebellar diameter versus biparietal diameter for the measurement of gestational age in third trimester Ali, Mohamed Adel AbdElSalam NasrElDin, Eman Moussa, Mahmoud J Ultrason Research Paper AIM: To compare the accuracy of biparietal diameter and transcerebellar diameter in measuring the gestational age during the third trimester of pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 275 pregnant women with singleton pregnancy between 32 and 37 weeks gestational age were recruited from the outpatient clinics of both Helwan University Hospital and Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, during the period from February 2021 to August 2021. Transcerebellar and biparietal diameters of the fetus were measured by a radiologist blinded to the women’s gestational age, and compared to the gestational age acquired from a reliable date of first day of last menstrual period. RESULTS: The gestational age calculated by first day of last menstrual period ranged from 32 to 37 weeks (34.35 ± 1.4), while estimated by transcerebellar and biparietal diameters ranged from 31 to 37 weeks (34.31 ± 1.39) and 31 to 39 weeks (34.32 ± 1.44), respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between gestational age and transcerebellar diameter (r = 0.98, p <0.001) as well as biparietal diameter (r = 0.87, p <0.001), yet a stronger correlation was with transcerebellar diameter. 93.6% of gestational age assessment by transcerebellar diameter was correct compared to only 79.9% by biparietal diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Transcerebellar diameter is a reliable single sonographic fetal biometric parameter for the assessment of gestational age in third trimester of pregnancy. Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9009340/ /pubmed/35449695 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2022.0007 Text en 2022 Polish Ultrasound Society. Published by Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND). Reproduction is permitted for personal, educational, non-commercial use, provided that the original article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Ali, Mohamed Adel
AbdElSalam NasrElDin, Eman
Moussa, Mahmoud
Transcerebellar diameter versus biparietal diameter for the measurement of gestational age in third trimester
title Transcerebellar diameter versus biparietal diameter for the measurement of gestational age in third trimester
title_full Transcerebellar diameter versus biparietal diameter for the measurement of gestational age in third trimester
title_fullStr Transcerebellar diameter versus biparietal diameter for the measurement of gestational age in third trimester
title_full_unstemmed Transcerebellar diameter versus biparietal diameter for the measurement of gestational age in third trimester
title_short Transcerebellar diameter versus biparietal diameter for the measurement of gestational age in third trimester
title_sort transcerebellar diameter versus biparietal diameter for the measurement of gestational age in third trimester
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449695
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2022.0007
work_keys_str_mv AT alimohamedadel transcerebellardiameterversusbiparietaldiameterforthemeasurementofgestationalageinthirdtrimester
AT abdelsalamnasreldineman transcerebellardiameterversusbiparietaldiameterforthemeasurementofgestationalageinthirdtrimester
AT moussamahmoud transcerebellardiameterversusbiparietaldiameterforthemeasurementofgestationalageinthirdtrimester