Cargando…

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery

Background In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) surgery. Methodology A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Gynecologic Oncology Section of the Department of Surgical Oncolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yasin, Iqra, Saeed Usmani, Afshan, Mohsin, Jibran, Asif, Rehan Bin, Kahlid, Nazish, Syed, Aamir Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35444906
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23180
_version_ 1784687252701446144
author Yasin, Iqra
Saeed Usmani, Afshan
Mohsin, Jibran
Asif, Rehan Bin
Kahlid, Nazish
Syed, Aamir Ali
author_facet Yasin, Iqra
Saeed Usmani, Afshan
Mohsin, Jibran
Asif, Rehan Bin
Kahlid, Nazish
Syed, Aamir Ali
author_sort Yasin, Iqra
collection PubMed
description Background In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) surgery. Methodology A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Gynecologic Oncology Section of the Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. Using non-probability consecutive sampling technique, all patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery involving low anterior resection for EOC between January 2016 and January 2021 were included. Patients were assessed for LARS symptoms using the LARS score, along with its risk factors. Descriptive statistics, that is, continuous variables were expressed as the median and interquartile range, while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The LARS score was categorized according to a two-tier model with “no or minor LARS” and “major LARS.” Univariate analyses were performed by the chi-square tests providing odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals to identify risk factors for major LARS. Results Overall, 95% of cases had LARS scores that fell in “no or minor LARS,” while only 5% of cases had “major LARS.” Univariate analyses relieved no statistically significant association between the occurrence of major LARS and any of the risk factors. Conclusions The prevalence of LARS was 5%, and no risk factors were associated with major LARS in our study population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9009365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90093652022-04-19 Prevalence and Risk Factors of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery Yasin, Iqra Saeed Usmani, Afshan Mohsin, Jibran Asif, Rehan Bin Kahlid, Nazish Syed, Aamir Ali Cureus Obstetrics/Gynecology Background In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) surgery. Methodology A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Gynecologic Oncology Section of the Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. Using non-probability consecutive sampling technique, all patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery involving low anterior resection for EOC between January 2016 and January 2021 were included. Patients were assessed for LARS symptoms using the LARS score, along with its risk factors. Descriptive statistics, that is, continuous variables were expressed as the median and interquartile range, while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The LARS score was categorized according to a two-tier model with “no or minor LARS” and “major LARS.” Univariate analyses were performed by the chi-square tests providing odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals to identify risk factors for major LARS. Results Overall, 95% of cases had LARS scores that fell in “no or minor LARS,” while only 5% of cases had “major LARS.” Univariate analyses relieved no statistically significant association between the occurrence of major LARS and any of the risk factors. Conclusions The prevalence of LARS was 5%, and no risk factors were associated with major LARS in our study population. Cureus 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9009365/ /pubmed/35444906 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23180 Text en Copyright © 2022, Yasin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Obstetrics/Gynecology
Yasin, Iqra
Saeed Usmani, Afshan
Mohsin, Jibran
Asif, Rehan Bin
Kahlid, Nazish
Syed, Aamir Ali
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery
title Prevalence and Risk Factors of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery
title_full Prevalence and Risk Factors of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery
title_fullStr Prevalence and Risk Factors of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and Risk Factors of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery
title_short Prevalence and Risk Factors of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery
title_sort prevalence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome in epithelial ovarian cancer surgery
topic Obstetrics/Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35444906
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23180
work_keys_str_mv AT yasiniqra prevalenceandriskfactorsoflowanteriorresectionsyndromeinepithelialovariancancersurgery
AT saeedusmaniafshan prevalenceandriskfactorsoflowanteriorresectionsyndromeinepithelialovariancancersurgery
AT mohsinjibran prevalenceandriskfactorsoflowanteriorresectionsyndromeinepithelialovariancancersurgery
AT asifrehanbin prevalenceandriskfactorsoflowanteriorresectionsyndromeinepithelialovariancancersurgery
AT kahlidnazish prevalenceandriskfactorsoflowanteriorresectionsyndromeinepithelialovariancancersurgery
AT syedaamirali prevalenceandriskfactorsoflowanteriorresectionsyndromeinepithelialovariancancersurgery