Cargando…

Are Smartwatches a Suitable Tool to Monitor Noise Exposure for Public Health Awareness and Otoprotection?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and tinnitus are common problems that can be prevented with hearing protection measures. Sound level meters and noise dosimeters enable to monitor and identify health-threatening occupational or recreational noise, but are limited in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Tim, Schraivogel, Stephan, Caversaccio, Marco, Wimmer, Wilhelm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35432148
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.856219
_version_ 1784687268285382656
author Fischer, Tim
Schraivogel, Stephan
Caversaccio, Marco
Wimmer, Wilhelm
author_facet Fischer, Tim
Schraivogel, Stephan
Caversaccio, Marco
Wimmer, Wilhelm
author_sort Fischer, Tim
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and tinnitus are common problems that can be prevented with hearing protection measures. Sound level meters and noise dosimeters enable to monitor and identify health-threatening occupational or recreational noise, but are limited in their daily application because they are usually difficult to operate, bulky, and expensive. Smartwatches, which are becoming increasingly available and popular, could be a valuable alternative to professional systems. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of smartwatches for accurate environmental noise monitoring. METHODS: The A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (L(Aeq)) was recorded and compared between a professional sound level meter and a popular smartwatch. Noise exposure was assessed in 13 occupational and recreational settings, covering a large range of sound pressure levels between 35 and 110 dBA. To assess measurement agreement, a Bland-Altman plot, linear regression, the intra-class correlation coefficient, and descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: Overall, the smartwatch underestimated the sound level meter measurements by 0.5 dBA (95% confidence interval [0.2, 0.8]). The intra-class correlation coefficient showed excellent agreement between the two devices (ICC = 0.99), ranging from 0.65 (music club) to 0.99 (concert) across settings. The smartwatch's sampling rate decreased significantly with lower sound pressure levels, which could have introduced measurement inaccuracies in dynamic acoustic environments. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of ambient noise with the tested smartwatch is sufficiently accurate and reliable to improve awareness of hazardous noise levels in the personal environment and to conduct exploratory clinical research. For professional and legally binding measurements, we recommend specialized sound level meters or noise dosimeters. In the future, smartwatches will play an important role in monitoring personal noise exposure and will provide a widely available and cost-effective measure for otoprotection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9009441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90094412022-04-15 Are Smartwatches a Suitable Tool to Monitor Noise Exposure for Public Health Awareness and Otoprotection? Fischer, Tim Schraivogel, Stephan Caversaccio, Marco Wimmer, Wilhelm Front Neurol Neurology INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and tinnitus are common problems that can be prevented with hearing protection measures. Sound level meters and noise dosimeters enable to monitor and identify health-threatening occupational or recreational noise, but are limited in their daily application because they are usually difficult to operate, bulky, and expensive. Smartwatches, which are becoming increasingly available and popular, could be a valuable alternative to professional systems. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of smartwatches for accurate environmental noise monitoring. METHODS: The A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (L(Aeq)) was recorded and compared between a professional sound level meter and a popular smartwatch. Noise exposure was assessed in 13 occupational and recreational settings, covering a large range of sound pressure levels between 35 and 110 dBA. To assess measurement agreement, a Bland-Altman plot, linear regression, the intra-class correlation coefficient, and descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: Overall, the smartwatch underestimated the sound level meter measurements by 0.5 dBA (95% confidence interval [0.2, 0.8]). The intra-class correlation coefficient showed excellent agreement between the two devices (ICC = 0.99), ranging from 0.65 (music club) to 0.99 (concert) across settings. The smartwatch's sampling rate decreased significantly with lower sound pressure levels, which could have introduced measurement inaccuracies in dynamic acoustic environments. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of ambient noise with the tested smartwatch is sufficiently accurate and reliable to improve awareness of hazardous noise levels in the personal environment and to conduct exploratory clinical research. For professional and legally binding measurements, we recommend specialized sound level meters or noise dosimeters. In the future, smartwatches will play an important role in monitoring personal noise exposure and will provide a widely available and cost-effective measure for otoprotection. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9009441/ /pubmed/35432148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.856219 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fischer, Schraivogel, Caversaccio and Wimmer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Fischer, Tim
Schraivogel, Stephan
Caversaccio, Marco
Wimmer, Wilhelm
Are Smartwatches a Suitable Tool to Monitor Noise Exposure for Public Health Awareness and Otoprotection?
title Are Smartwatches a Suitable Tool to Monitor Noise Exposure for Public Health Awareness and Otoprotection?
title_full Are Smartwatches a Suitable Tool to Monitor Noise Exposure for Public Health Awareness and Otoprotection?
title_fullStr Are Smartwatches a Suitable Tool to Monitor Noise Exposure for Public Health Awareness and Otoprotection?
title_full_unstemmed Are Smartwatches a Suitable Tool to Monitor Noise Exposure for Public Health Awareness and Otoprotection?
title_short Are Smartwatches a Suitable Tool to Monitor Noise Exposure for Public Health Awareness and Otoprotection?
title_sort are smartwatches a suitable tool to monitor noise exposure for public health awareness and otoprotection?
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35432148
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.856219
work_keys_str_mv AT fischertim aresmartwatchesasuitabletooltomonitornoiseexposureforpublichealthawarenessandotoprotection
AT schraivogelstephan aresmartwatchesasuitabletooltomonitornoiseexposureforpublichealthawarenessandotoprotection
AT caversacciomarco aresmartwatchesasuitabletooltomonitornoiseexposureforpublichealthawarenessandotoprotection
AT wimmerwilhelm aresmartwatchesasuitabletooltomonitornoiseexposureforpublichealthawarenessandotoprotection