Cargando…

Comparing SARC-CalF With SARC-F for Screening Sarcopenia in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of sarcopenia is high in older people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is now considered a critical problem in the healthcare sector. However, the preferred screening tool for identifying sarcopenia remains unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to ensure that th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Zeru, Zhang, Ping, Chen, Yifei, Jiang, Jiahong, Zhou, Zijun, Zhu, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.803924
_version_ 1784687285259730944
author Xu, Zeru
Zhang, Ping
Chen, Yifei
Jiang, Jiahong
Zhou, Zijun
Zhu, Hong
author_facet Xu, Zeru
Zhang, Ping
Chen, Yifei
Jiang, Jiahong
Zhou, Zijun
Zhu, Hong
author_sort Xu, Zeru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence of sarcopenia is high in older people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is now considered a critical problem in the healthcare sector. However, the preferred screening tool for identifying sarcopenia remains unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to ensure that the diagnostic values of the SARC-F (strength, assisting with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falling) and SARC-CalF (SARC and calf circumference) scales were compared with five reference diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. Patients diagnosed with diabetes were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance were assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, handgrip strength, and gait speed assessment. Five diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia (Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia, International Working Group on Sarcopenia, Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Sarcopenia Project, Society on Sarcopenia Cachexia and Wasting Disorders, and European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People criteria) were utilized. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed on the SARC-CalF and SARC-F scales. The diagnostic precision of both instruments was determined using the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curves (AUC). RESULTS: This study included 689 subjects (459 men and 230 women) with a mean age of 58.1 ± 13.2 years. In accordance with the five reference diagnostic parameters, the prevalence of sarcopenia was between 4.5 and 19.2%. In addition, the range of sensitivity of SARC-F and SARC-CalF ranged from 61.4 to 67.4 and 82.6 to 91.8%, respectively. Concurrently, the specificity ranged from 63.1 to 67.3 and 51.5 to 61.2%, respectively. Overall, AUC values for SARC-CalF were higher than those for SARC-F, regardless of the diagnostic standard, sex, or age. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that SARC-CalF significantly enhances the sensitivity and overall diagnosis of SARC-F. SARC-CalF appears to be an optimal screening tool for sarcopenia in adults with T2DM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9009513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90095132022-04-15 Comparing SARC-CalF With SARC-F for Screening Sarcopenia in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Xu, Zeru Zhang, Ping Chen, Yifei Jiang, Jiahong Zhou, Zijun Zhu, Hong Front Nutr Nutrition BACKGROUND: The prevalence of sarcopenia is high in older people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is now considered a critical problem in the healthcare sector. However, the preferred screening tool for identifying sarcopenia remains unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to ensure that the diagnostic values of the SARC-F (strength, assisting with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falling) and SARC-CalF (SARC and calf circumference) scales were compared with five reference diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. Patients diagnosed with diabetes were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance were assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, handgrip strength, and gait speed assessment. Five diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia (Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia, International Working Group on Sarcopenia, Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Sarcopenia Project, Society on Sarcopenia Cachexia and Wasting Disorders, and European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People criteria) were utilized. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed on the SARC-CalF and SARC-F scales. The diagnostic precision of both instruments was determined using the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curves (AUC). RESULTS: This study included 689 subjects (459 men and 230 women) with a mean age of 58.1 ± 13.2 years. In accordance with the five reference diagnostic parameters, the prevalence of sarcopenia was between 4.5 and 19.2%. In addition, the range of sensitivity of SARC-F and SARC-CalF ranged from 61.4 to 67.4 and 82.6 to 91.8%, respectively. Concurrently, the specificity ranged from 63.1 to 67.3 and 51.5 to 61.2%, respectively. Overall, AUC values for SARC-CalF were higher than those for SARC-F, regardless of the diagnostic standard, sex, or age. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that SARC-CalF significantly enhances the sensitivity and overall diagnosis of SARC-F. SARC-CalF appears to be an optimal screening tool for sarcopenia in adults with T2DM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9009513/ /pubmed/35433779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.803924 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xu, Zhang, Chen, Jiang, Zhou and Zhu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Xu, Zeru
Zhang, Ping
Chen, Yifei
Jiang, Jiahong
Zhou, Zijun
Zhu, Hong
Comparing SARC-CalF With SARC-F for Screening Sarcopenia in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title Comparing SARC-CalF With SARC-F for Screening Sarcopenia in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_full Comparing SARC-CalF With SARC-F for Screening Sarcopenia in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_fullStr Comparing SARC-CalF With SARC-F for Screening Sarcopenia in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Comparing SARC-CalF With SARC-F for Screening Sarcopenia in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_short Comparing SARC-CalF With SARC-F for Screening Sarcopenia in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_sort comparing sarc-calf with sarc-f for screening sarcopenia in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.803924
work_keys_str_mv AT xuzeru comparingsarccalfwithsarcfforscreeningsarcopeniainadultswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT zhangping comparingsarccalfwithsarcfforscreeningsarcopeniainadultswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT chenyifei comparingsarccalfwithsarcfforscreeningsarcopeniainadultswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT jiangjiahong comparingsarccalfwithsarcfforscreeningsarcopeniainadultswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT zhouzijun comparingsarccalfwithsarcfforscreeningsarcopeniainadultswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT zhuhong comparingsarccalfwithsarcfforscreeningsarcopeniainadultswithtype2diabetesmellitus