Cargando…
Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets
Segmenting three-dimensional (3D) microscopy images is essential for understanding phenomena like morphogenesis, cell division, cellular growth, and genetic expression patterns. Recently, deep learning (DL) pipelines have been developed, which claim to provide high accuracy segmentation of cellular...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009879 |
_version_ | 1784687327635832832 |
---|---|
author | Kar, Anuradha Petit, Manuel Refahi, Yassin Cerutti, Guillaume Godin, Christophe Traas, Jan |
author_facet | Kar, Anuradha Petit, Manuel Refahi, Yassin Cerutti, Guillaume Godin, Christophe Traas, Jan |
author_sort | Kar, Anuradha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Segmenting three-dimensional (3D) microscopy images is essential for understanding phenomena like morphogenesis, cell division, cellular growth, and genetic expression patterns. Recently, deep learning (DL) pipelines have been developed, which claim to provide high accuracy segmentation of cellular images and are increasingly considered as the state of the art for image segmentation problems. However, it remains difficult to define their relative performances as the concurrent diversity and lack of uniform evaluation strategies makes it difficult to know how their results compare. In this paper, we first made an inventory of the available DL methods for 3D cell segmentation. We next implemented and quantitatively compared a number of representative DL pipelines, alongside a highly efficient non-DL method named MARS. The DL methods were trained on a common dataset of 3D cellular confocal microscopy images. Their segmentation accuracies were also tested in the presence of different image artifacts. A specific method for segmentation quality evaluation was adopted, which isolates segmentation errors due to under- or oversegmentation. This is complemented with a 3D visualization strategy for interactive exploration of segmentation quality. Our analysis shows that the DL pipelines have different levels of accuracy. Two of them, which are end-to-end 3D and were originally designed for cell boundary detection, show high performance and offer clear advantages in terms of adaptability to new data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9009699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90096992022-04-15 Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets Kar, Anuradha Petit, Manuel Refahi, Yassin Cerutti, Guillaume Godin, Christophe Traas, Jan PLoS Comput Biol Review Segmenting three-dimensional (3D) microscopy images is essential for understanding phenomena like morphogenesis, cell division, cellular growth, and genetic expression patterns. Recently, deep learning (DL) pipelines have been developed, which claim to provide high accuracy segmentation of cellular images and are increasingly considered as the state of the art for image segmentation problems. However, it remains difficult to define their relative performances as the concurrent diversity and lack of uniform evaluation strategies makes it difficult to know how their results compare. In this paper, we first made an inventory of the available DL methods for 3D cell segmentation. We next implemented and quantitatively compared a number of representative DL pipelines, alongside a highly efficient non-DL method named MARS. The DL methods were trained on a common dataset of 3D cellular confocal microscopy images. Their segmentation accuracies were also tested in the presence of different image artifacts. A specific method for segmentation quality evaluation was adopted, which isolates segmentation errors due to under- or oversegmentation. This is complemented with a 3D visualization strategy for interactive exploration of segmentation quality. Our analysis shows that the DL pipelines have different levels of accuracy. Two of them, which are end-to-end 3D and were originally designed for cell boundary detection, show high performance and offer clear advantages in terms of adaptability to new data. Public Library of Science 2022-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9009699/ /pubmed/35421081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009879 Text en © 2022 Kar et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Kar, Anuradha Petit, Manuel Refahi, Yassin Cerutti, Guillaume Godin, Christophe Traas, Jan Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets |
title | Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets |
title_full | Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets |
title_short | Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets |
title_sort | benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3d instance segmentation of confocal image datasets |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009879 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karanuradha benchmarkingofdeeplearningalgorithmsfor3dinstancesegmentationofconfocalimagedatasets AT petitmanuel benchmarkingofdeeplearningalgorithmsfor3dinstancesegmentationofconfocalimagedatasets AT refahiyassin benchmarkingofdeeplearningalgorithmsfor3dinstancesegmentationofconfocalimagedatasets AT ceruttiguillaume benchmarkingofdeeplearningalgorithmsfor3dinstancesegmentationofconfocalimagedatasets AT godinchristophe benchmarkingofdeeplearningalgorithmsfor3dinstancesegmentationofconfocalimagedatasets AT traasjan benchmarkingofdeeplearningalgorithmsfor3dinstancesegmentationofconfocalimagedatasets |