Cargando…

Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets

Segmenting three-dimensional (3D) microscopy images is essential for understanding phenomena like morphogenesis, cell division, cellular growth, and genetic expression patterns. Recently, deep learning (DL) pipelines have been developed, which claim to provide high accuracy segmentation of cellular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kar, Anuradha, Petit, Manuel, Refahi, Yassin, Cerutti, Guillaume, Godin, Christophe, Traas, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009879
_version_ 1784687327635832832
author Kar, Anuradha
Petit, Manuel
Refahi, Yassin
Cerutti, Guillaume
Godin, Christophe
Traas, Jan
author_facet Kar, Anuradha
Petit, Manuel
Refahi, Yassin
Cerutti, Guillaume
Godin, Christophe
Traas, Jan
author_sort Kar, Anuradha
collection PubMed
description Segmenting three-dimensional (3D) microscopy images is essential for understanding phenomena like morphogenesis, cell division, cellular growth, and genetic expression patterns. Recently, deep learning (DL) pipelines have been developed, which claim to provide high accuracy segmentation of cellular images and are increasingly considered as the state of the art for image segmentation problems. However, it remains difficult to define their relative performances as the concurrent diversity and lack of uniform evaluation strategies makes it difficult to know how their results compare. In this paper, we first made an inventory of the available DL methods for 3D cell segmentation. We next implemented and quantitatively compared a number of representative DL pipelines, alongside a highly efficient non-DL method named MARS. The DL methods were trained on a common dataset of 3D cellular confocal microscopy images. Their segmentation accuracies were also tested in the presence of different image artifacts. A specific method for segmentation quality evaluation was adopted, which isolates segmentation errors due to under- or oversegmentation. This is complemented with a 3D visualization strategy for interactive exploration of segmentation quality. Our analysis shows that the DL pipelines have different levels of accuracy. Two of them, which are end-to-end 3D and were originally designed for cell boundary detection, show high performance and offer clear advantages in terms of adaptability to new data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9009699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90096992022-04-15 Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets Kar, Anuradha Petit, Manuel Refahi, Yassin Cerutti, Guillaume Godin, Christophe Traas, Jan PLoS Comput Biol Review Segmenting three-dimensional (3D) microscopy images is essential for understanding phenomena like morphogenesis, cell division, cellular growth, and genetic expression patterns. Recently, deep learning (DL) pipelines have been developed, which claim to provide high accuracy segmentation of cellular images and are increasingly considered as the state of the art for image segmentation problems. However, it remains difficult to define their relative performances as the concurrent diversity and lack of uniform evaluation strategies makes it difficult to know how their results compare. In this paper, we first made an inventory of the available DL methods for 3D cell segmentation. We next implemented and quantitatively compared a number of representative DL pipelines, alongside a highly efficient non-DL method named MARS. The DL methods were trained on a common dataset of 3D cellular confocal microscopy images. Their segmentation accuracies were also tested in the presence of different image artifacts. A specific method for segmentation quality evaluation was adopted, which isolates segmentation errors due to under- or oversegmentation. This is complemented with a 3D visualization strategy for interactive exploration of segmentation quality. Our analysis shows that the DL pipelines have different levels of accuracy. Two of them, which are end-to-end 3D and were originally designed for cell boundary detection, show high performance and offer clear advantages in terms of adaptability to new data. Public Library of Science 2022-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9009699/ /pubmed/35421081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009879 Text en © 2022 Kar et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Kar, Anuradha
Petit, Manuel
Refahi, Yassin
Cerutti, Guillaume
Godin, Christophe
Traas, Jan
Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets
title Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets
title_full Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets
title_fullStr Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets
title_short Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets
title_sort benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3d instance segmentation of confocal image datasets
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009879
work_keys_str_mv AT karanuradha benchmarkingofdeeplearningalgorithmsfor3dinstancesegmentationofconfocalimagedatasets
AT petitmanuel benchmarkingofdeeplearningalgorithmsfor3dinstancesegmentationofconfocalimagedatasets
AT refahiyassin benchmarkingofdeeplearningalgorithmsfor3dinstancesegmentationofconfocalimagedatasets
AT ceruttiguillaume benchmarkingofdeeplearningalgorithmsfor3dinstancesegmentationofconfocalimagedatasets
AT godinchristophe benchmarkingofdeeplearningalgorithmsfor3dinstancesegmentationofconfocalimagedatasets
AT traasjan benchmarkingofdeeplearningalgorithmsfor3dinstancesegmentationofconfocalimagedatasets