Cargando…

Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches

Background and study aims  Roux-en-Y gastric bypass presents an anatomic challenge for patients needing ERCP. EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) offers high clinical success but carries considerable risk of adverse events (AEs) with no standardized technical approach. In our study, we review the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bahdi, Firas, George, Rollin, Paneerselvam, Kavea, Nguyen, Dang, Abidi, Wasif M., Othman, Mohamed O., Raijman, Isaac
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9010084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1783-9564
_version_ 1784687407563538432
author Bahdi, Firas
George, Rollin
Paneerselvam, Kavea
Nguyen, Dang
Abidi, Wasif M.
Othman, Mohamed O.
Raijman, Isaac
author_facet Bahdi, Firas
George, Rollin
Paneerselvam, Kavea
Nguyen, Dang
Abidi, Wasif M.
Othman, Mohamed O.
Raijman, Isaac
author_sort Bahdi, Firas
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Roux-en-Y gastric bypass presents an anatomic challenge for patients needing ERCP. EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) offers high clinical success but carries considerable risk of adverse events (AEs) with no standardized technical approach. In our study, we review the safety and efficacy of our various EDGE technical approaches. Patients and methods  A retrospective single-center study of all patients who underwent EDGE procedures between February 2018 and November 2019. Primary outcomes included comparing the technical and clinical success, AEs, and lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) migration rates per access route (gastrogastric vs jejuno-gastric), number of procedure stages (single-stage vs two-stage), and stent size (15 mm vs 20 mm). Secondary outcomes included LAMS migration characteristics and management. Results  Thirty-two EDGE procedures were performed in 29 patients, including 17 single-stage and 15 two-stage procedures, 23 gastrogastric, and nine jejuno-gastric routes, fourteen 15-mm and 17 20-mm LAMS. Overall technical and clinical success rates were 96.9 % and 87.1 %, respectively, without any significant difference between groups. The overall AE rate was (34.4 %) and was significantly lower in the 20-mm LAMS group compared to the 15-mm group (17.6 % vs 57.1 %, P  = 0.03). Compared to two-stage procedures, there was no significant difference in AEs with single-stage procedures (35.3 % vs 33.3 %, P  = 0.33). The LAMS migration rate was (25 %) with no significant difference between groups. Most migrations were around the index procedure and managed endoscopically (62.5 %). Conclusions  EDGE offers high clinical success rates but AE rates remain significant. In our series, a 20-mm LAMS resulted in a significantly lower AE rate than the 15-mm LAMS. Large multicenter studies are recommended to identify technical factors leading to an optimal EDGE procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9010084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90100842022-04-15 Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches Bahdi, Firas George, Rollin Paneerselvam, Kavea Nguyen, Dang Abidi, Wasif M. Othman, Mohamed O. Raijman, Isaac Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Roux-en-Y gastric bypass presents an anatomic challenge for patients needing ERCP. EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) offers high clinical success but carries considerable risk of adverse events (AEs) with no standardized technical approach. In our study, we review the safety and efficacy of our various EDGE technical approaches. Patients and methods  A retrospective single-center study of all patients who underwent EDGE procedures between February 2018 and November 2019. Primary outcomes included comparing the technical and clinical success, AEs, and lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) migration rates per access route (gastrogastric vs jejuno-gastric), number of procedure stages (single-stage vs two-stage), and stent size (15 mm vs 20 mm). Secondary outcomes included LAMS migration characteristics and management. Results  Thirty-two EDGE procedures were performed in 29 patients, including 17 single-stage and 15 two-stage procedures, 23 gastrogastric, and nine jejuno-gastric routes, fourteen 15-mm and 17 20-mm LAMS. Overall technical and clinical success rates were 96.9 % and 87.1 %, respectively, without any significant difference between groups. The overall AE rate was (34.4 %) and was significantly lower in the 20-mm LAMS group compared to the 15-mm group (17.6 % vs 57.1 %, P  = 0.03). Compared to two-stage procedures, there was no significant difference in AEs with single-stage procedures (35.3 % vs 33.3 %, P  = 0.33). The LAMS migration rate was (25 %) with no significant difference between groups. Most migrations were around the index procedure and managed endoscopically (62.5 %). Conclusions  EDGE offers high clinical success rates but AE rates remain significant. In our series, a 20-mm LAMS resulted in a significantly lower AE rate than the 15-mm LAMS. Large multicenter studies are recommended to identify technical factors leading to an optimal EDGE procedure. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9010084/ /pubmed/35433222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1783-9564 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Bahdi, Firas
George, Rollin
Paneerselvam, Kavea
Nguyen, Dang
Abidi, Wasif M.
Othman, Mohamed O.
Raijman, Isaac
Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches
title Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches
title_full Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches
title_fullStr Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches
title_short Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches
title_sort comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9010084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1783-9564
work_keys_str_mv AT bahdifiras comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches
AT georgerollin comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches
AT paneerselvamkavea comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches
AT nguyendang comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches
AT abidiwasifm comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches
AT othmanmohamedo comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches
AT raijmanisaac comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches