Cargando…
Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches
Background and study aims Roux-en-Y gastric bypass presents an anatomic challenge for patients needing ERCP. EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) offers high clinical success but carries considerable risk of adverse events (AEs) with no standardized technical approach. In our study, we review the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9010084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1783-9564 |
_version_ | 1784687407563538432 |
---|---|
author | Bahdi, Firas George, Rollin Paneerselvam, Kavea Nguyen, Dang Abidi, Wasif M. Othman, Mohamed O. Raijman, Isaac |
author_facet | Bahdi, Firas George, Rollin Paneerselvam, Kavea Nguyen, Dang Abidi, Wasif M. Othman, Mohamed O. Raijman, Isaac |
author_sort | Bahdi, Firas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Roux-en-Y gastric bypass presents an anatomic challenge for patients needing ERCP. EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) offers high clinical success but carries considerable risk of adverse events (AEs) with no standardized technical approach. In our study, we review the safety and efficacy of our various EDGE technical approaches. Patients and methods A retrospective single-center study of all patients who underwent EDGE procedures between February 2018 and November 2019. Primary outcomes included comparing the technical and clinical success, AEs, and lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) migration rates per access route (gastrogastric vs jejuno-gastric), number of procedure stages (single-stage vs two-stage), and stent size (15 mm vs 20 mm). Secondary outcomes included LAMS migration characteristics and management. Results Thirty-two EDGE procedures were performed in 29 patients, including 17 single-stage and 15 two-stage procedures, 23 gastrogastric, and nine jejuno-gastric routes, fourteen 15-mm and 17 20-mm LAMS. Overall technical and clinical success rates were 96.9 % and 87.1 %, respectively, without any significant difference between groups. The overall AE rate was (34.4 %) and was significantly lower in the 20-mm LAMS group compared to the 15-mm group (17.6 % vs 57.1 %, P = 0.03). Compared to two-stage procedures, there was no significant difference in AEs with single-stage procedures (35.3 % vs 33.3 %, P = 0.33). The LAMS migration rate was (25 %) with no significant difference between groups. Most migrations were around the index procedure and managed endoscopically (62.5 %). Conclusions EDGE offers high clinical success rates but AE rates remain significant. In our series, a 20-mm LAMS resulted in a significantly lower AE rate than the 15-mm LAMS. Large multicenter studies are recommended to identify technical factors leading to an optimal EDGE procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9010084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90100842022-04-15 Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches Bahdi, Firas George, Rollin Paneerselvam, Kavea Nguyen, Dang Abidi, Wasif M. Othman, Mohamed O. Raijman, Isaac Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Roux-en-Y gastric bypass presents an anatomic challenge for patients needing ERCP. EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) offers high clinical success but carries considerable risk of adverse events (AEs) with no standardized technical approach. In our study, we review the safety and efficacy of our various EDGE technical approaches. Patients and methods A retrospective single-center study of all patients who underwent EDGE procedures between February 2018 and November 2019. Primary outcomes included comparing the technical and clinical success, AEs, and lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) migration rates per access route (gastrogastric vs jejuno-gastric), number of procedure stages (single-stage vs two-stage), and stent size (15 mm vs 20 mm). Secondary outcomes included LAMS migration characteristics and management. Results Thirty-two EDGE procedures were performed in 29 patients, including 17 single-stage and 15 two-stage procedures, 23 gastrogastric, and nine jejuno-gastric routes, fourteen 15-mm and 17 20-mm LAMS. Overall technical and clinical success rates were 96.9 % and 87.1 %, respectively, without any significant difference between groups. The overall AE rate was (34.4 %) and was significantly lower in the 20-mm LAMS group compared to the 15-mm group (17.6 % vs 57.1 %, P = 0.03). Compared to two-stage procedures, there was no significant difference in AEs with single-stage procedures (35.3 % vs 33.3 %, P = 0.33). The LAMS migration rate was (25 %) with no significant difference between groups. Most migrations were around the index procedure and managed endoscopically (62.5 %). Conclusions EDGE offers high clinical success rates but AE rates remain significant. In our series, a 20-mm LAMS resulted in a significantly lower AE rate than the 15-mm LAMS. Large multicenter studies are recommended to identify technical factors leading to an optimal EDGE procedure. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9010084/ /pubmed/35433222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1783-9564 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Bahdi, Firas George, Rollin Paneerselvam, Kavea Nguyen, Dang Abidi, Wasif M. Othman, Mohamed O. Raijman, Isaac Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches |
title | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches |
title_full | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches |
title_fullStr | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches |
title_short | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches |
title_sort | comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes using various technical approaches |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9010084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1783-9564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bahdifiras comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches AT georgerollin comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches AT paneerselvamkavea comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches AT nguyendang comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches AT abidiwasifm comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches AT othmanmohamedo comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches AT raijmanisaac comparisonofendoscopicultrasounddirectedtransgastricendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyoutcomesusingvarioustechnicalapproaches |