Cargando…

Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Hemivertebra Resection via the Posterior Approach Assisted With Unilateral and Bilateral Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Congenital Scoliosis

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the curative efficacy of hemivertebra resection via the posterior approach assisted with unilateral and bilateral internal fixation in the treatment of congenital scoliosis (CS). METHODS: In this study, 29 children (15 males and 14 females), who underwent hemiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Jun-Ting, Liu, Fu-Yun, Hu, Wei-Ming, Liu, Jing-Jing, Xia, Bing, Niu, Xue-Qiang, Li, Xin-Wei, Zhao, Yu-Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9010512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433821
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.821387
_version_ 1784687492640800768
author He, Jun-Ting
Liu, Fu-Yun
Hu, Wei-Ming
Liu, Jing-Jing
Xia, Bing
Niu, Xue-Qiang
Li, Xin-Wei
Zhao, Yu-Feng
author_facet He, Jun-Ting
Liu, Fu-Yun
Hu, Wei-Ming
Liu, Jing-Jing
Xia, Bing
Niu, Xue-Qiang
Li, Xin-Wei
Zhao, Yu-Feng
author_sort He, Jun-Ting
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the curative efficacy of hemivertebra resection via the posterior approach assisted with unilateral and bilateral internal fixation in the treatment of congenital scoliosis (CS). METHODS: In this study, 29 children (15 males and 14 females), who underwent hemivertebra resection via the posterior approach and received internal fixation from November 2005 to September 2018, were analyzed retrospectively. The age of these patients ranged from 0.9 to 15 years, with an average of 3.8 years. The follow-up duration ranged from 2 to 12.3 years, with an average of 5.7 years. The patients in group A received unilateral internal fixation, and those in group B received bilateral internal fixation. The operation duration, bleeding volume, and complications during the operation, as well as the Cobb angles of scoliosis and kyphosis before and after the operation and at the last follow-up, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In group A, the operation duration was 207.4 ± 54.5 min, and the bleeding volume was 215.3 ± 75.4 ml; in group B, the operation duration was 249.5 ± 51.0 min, and the bleeding volume was 291.3 ± 115.6 ml (P < 0.05). The Cobb angles of segmental scoliosis, segmental kyphosis, cephalic compensatory curve, and caudal compensatory curve were significantly improved in the two groups after operation and at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). The post-operative correction rate of the scoliosis Cobb angle was 67.2% in group A and 79.5% in group B; and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the correction rate of the scoliosis Cobb angle was 72.7% in group A and 76.2% in group B (P > 0.05). After the operation and at the last follow-up, the correction rates of kyphosis were 83.1 and 79.6% in group A and 71.8 and 65.5% in group B (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Hemivertebra resection via posterior approach with unilateral internal fixation can also achieve the effect of bilateral internal fixation in the treatment of CS. It is able to preserve a certain degree of contralateral spinal growth potential and is a feasible method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9010512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90105122022-04-16 Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Hemivertebra Resection via the Posterior Approach Assisted With Unilateral and Bilateral Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Congenital Scoliosis He, Jun-Ting Liu, Fu-Yun Hu, Wei-Ming Liu, Jing-Jing Xia, Bing Niu, Xue-Qiang Li, Xin-Wei Zhao, Yu-Feng Front Surg Surgery OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the curative efficacy of hemivertebra resection via the posterior approach assisted with unilateral and bilateral internal fixation in the treatment of congenital scoliosis (CS). METHODS: In this study, 29 children (15 males and 14 females), who underwent hemivertebra resection via the posterior approach and received internal fixation from November 2005 to September 2018, were analyzed retrospectively. The age of these patients ranged from 0.9 to 15 years, with an average of 3.8 years. The follow-up duration ranged from 2 to 12.3 years, with an average of 5.7 years. The patients in group A received unilateral internal fixation, and those in group B received bilateral internal fixation. The operation duration, bleeding volume, and complications during the operation, as well as the Cobb angles of scoliosis and kyphosis before and after the operation and at the last follow-up, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In group A, the operation duration was 207.4 ± 54.5 min, and the bleeding volume was 215.3 ± 75.4 ml; in group B, the operation duration was 249.5 ± 51.0 min, and the bleeding volume was 291.3 ± 115.6 ml (P < 0.05). The Cobb angles of segmental scoliosis, segmental kyphosis, cephalic compensatory curve, and caudal compensatory curve were significantly improved in the two groups after operation and at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). The post-operative correction rate of the scoliosis Cobb angle was 67.2% in group A and 79.5% in group B; and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the correction rate of the scoliosis Cobb angle was 72.7% in group A and 76.2% in group B (P > 0.05). After the operation and at the last follow-up, the correction rates of kyphosis were 83.1 and 79.6% in group A and 71.8 and 65.5% in group B (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Hemivertebra resection via posterior approach with unilateral internal fixation can also achieve the effect of bilateral internal fixation in the treatment of CS. It is able to preserve a certain degree of contralateral spinal growth potential and is a feasible method. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9010512/ /pubmed/35433821 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.821387 Text en Copyright © 2022 He, Liu, Hu, Liu, Xia, Niu, Li and Zhao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
He, Jun-Ting
Liu, Fu-Yun
Hu, Wei-Ming
Liu, Jing-Jing
Xia, Bing
Niu, Xue-Qiang
Li, Xin-Wei
Zhao, Yu-Feng
Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Hemivertebra Resection via the Posterior Approach Assisted With Unilateral and Bilateral Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Congenital Scoliosis
title Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Hemivertebra Resection via the Posterior Approach Assisted With Unilateral and Bilateral Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Congenital Scoliosis
title_full Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Hemivertebra Resection via the Posterior Approach Assisted With Unilateral and Bilateral Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Congenital Scoliosis
title_fullStr Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Hemivertebra Resection via the Posterior Approach Assisted With Unilateral and Bilateral Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Congenital Scoliosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Hemivertebra Resection via the Posterior Approach Assisted With Unilateral and Bilateral Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Congenital Scoliosis
title_short Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Hemivertebra Resection via the Posterior Approach Assisted With Unilateral and Bilateral Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Congenital Scoliosis
title_sort comparison of the curative efficacy of hemivertebra resection via the posterior approach assisted with unilateral and bilateral internal fixation in the treatment of congenital scoliosis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9010512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433821
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.821387
work_keys_str_mv AT hejunting comparisonofthecurativeefficacyofhemivertebraresectionviatheposteriorapproachassistedwithunilateralandbilateralinternalfixationinthetreatmentofcongenitalscoliosis
AT liufuyun comparisonofthecurativeefficacyofhemivertebraresectionviatheposteriorapproachassistedwithunilateralandbilateralinternalfixationinthetreatmentofcongenitalscoliosis
AT huweiming comparisonofthecurativeefficacyofhemivertebraresectionviatheposteriorapproachassistedwithunilateralandbilateralinternalfixationinthetreatmentofcongenitalscoliosis
AT liujingjing comparisonofthecurativeefficacyofhemivertebraresectionviatheposteriorapproachassistedwithunilateralandbilateralinternalfixationinthetreatmentofcongenitalscoliosis
AT xiabing comparisonofthecurativeefficacyofhemivertebraresectionviatheposteriorapproachassistedwithunilateralandbilateralinternalfixationinthetreatmentofcongenitalscoliosis
AT niuxueqiang comparisonofthecurativeefficacyofhemivertebraresectionviatheposteriorapproachassistedwithunilateralandbilateralinternalfixationinthetreatmentofcongenitalscoliosis
AT lixinwei comparisonofthecurativeefficacyofhemivertebraresectionviatheposteriorapproachassistedwithunilateralandbilateralinternalfixationinthetreatmentofcongenitalscoliosis
AT zhaoyufeng comparisonofthecurativeefficacyofhemivertebraresectionviatheposteriorapproachassistedwithunilateralandbilateralinternalfixationinthetreatmentofcongenitalscoliosis