Cargando…

A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome

INTRODUCTION: Petroclival meningioma (PCM) remains a major neurosurgical challenge. There are still controversial strategic treatment concepts about surgical approach, the extent of resection, and postoperative radiotherapy. We aimed to evaluate prognostic factors influencing the progression-free su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masalha, Waseem, Heiland, Dieter Henrik, Steiert, Christine, Krueger, Marie T., Schnell, Daniel, Scheiwe, Christian, Grosu, Anca-L., Schnell, Oliver, Beck, Juergen, Grauvogel, Juergen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9010819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.786909
_version_ 1784687566392393728
author Masalha, Waseem
Heiland, Dieter Henrik
Steiert, Christine
Krueger, Marie T.
Schnell, Daniel
Scheiwe, Christian
Grosu, Anca-L.
Schnell, Oliver
Beck, Juergen
Grauvogel, Juergen
author_facet Masalha, Waseem
Heiland, Dieter Henrik
Steiert, Christine
Krueger, Marie T.
Schnell, Daniel
Scheiwe, Christian
Grosu, Anca-L.
Schnell, Oliver
Beck, Juergen
Grauvogel, Juergen
author_sort Masalha, Waseem
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Petroclival meningioma (PCM) remains a major neurosurgical challenge. There are still controversial strategic treatment concepts about surgical approach, the extent of resection, and postoperative radiotherapy. We aimed to evaluate prognostic factors influencing the progression-free survival (PFS) rates of PCM, with a particular focus on the retrosigmoidal approach, the role of the extent of resection, and postoperative radiotherapy. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with complete follow-up data were included. All patients were operated on via a retrosigmoidal approach, of whom 19 underwent gross total resection (GTR) and 70 underwent subtotal resection (STR). In the subgroups of tumors with infiltration of the cavernous sinus, 41 patients received near total resection (NTR) and 24 STR. Thirty-one patients received postoperative radiotherapy of the residual tumor and 58 were treated with surgery alone. Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox regression were used to identify significant factors associated with treatment. RESULTS: GTR (p=0.0107) and postoperative radiotherapy (p=0.014) were associated with significantly improved PFS. Even the subgroup analysis of extended PCM with infiltration of the cavernous sinus (CS) showed an advantage for PFS after near total resection (NTR) (p=0.0017). The additional radiotherapy of the residual tumor in the CS in this subgroup also showed a beneficial effect on PFS (p=0.012). CONCLUSION: The extension of surgical resection remains the most important prognostic factor in relation to oncological outcomes. However, the GTR of extended PCM with infiltration of the CS is associated with significant neurological morbidity and requires additional adjuvant therapy concepts. Postoperative radiotherapy is an important element in the treatment of the residual tumor after surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9010819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90108192022-04-16 A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome Masalha, Waseem Heiland, Dieter Henrik Steiert, Christine Krueger, Marie T. Schnell, Daniel Scheiwe, Christian Grosu, Anca-L. Schnell, Oliver Beck, Juergen Grauvogel, Juergen Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Petroclival meningioma (PCM) remains a major neurosurgical challenge. There are still controversial strategic treatment concepts about surgical approach, the extent of resection, and postoperative radiotherapy. We aimed to evaluate prognostic factors influencing the progression-free survival (PFS) rates of PCM, with a particular focus on the retrosigmoidal approach, the role of the extent of resection, and postoperative radiotherapy. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with complete follow-up data were included. All patients were operated on via a retrosigmoidal approach, of whom 19 underwent gross total resection (GTR) and 70 underwent subtotal resection (STR). In the subgroups of tumors with infiltration of the cavernous sinus, 41 patients received near total resection (NTR) and 24 STR. Thirty-one patients received postoperative radiotherapy of the residual tumor and 58 were treated with surgery alone. Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox regression were used to identify significant factors associated with treatment. RESULTS: GTR (p=0.0107) and postoperative radiotherapy (p=0.014) were associated with significantly improved PFS. Even the subgroup analysis of extended PCM with infiltration of the cavernous sinus (CS) showed an advantage for PFS after near total resection (NTR) (p=0.0017). The additional radiotherapy of the residual tumor in the CS in this subgroup also showed a beneficial effect on PFS (p=0.012). CONCLUSION: The extension of surgical resection remains the most important prognostic factor in relation to oncological outcomes. However, the GTR of extended PCM with infiltration of the CS is associated with significant neurological morbidity and requires additional adjuvant therapy concepts. Postoperative radiotherapy is an important element in the treatment of the residual tumor after surgery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9010819/ /pubmed/35433418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.786909 Text en Copyright © 2022 Masalha, Heiland, Steiert, Krueger, Schnell, Scheiwe, Grosu, Schnell, Beck and Grauvogel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Masalha, Waseem
Heiland, Dieter Henrik
Steiert, Christine
Krueger, Marie T.
Schnell, Daniel
Scheiwe, Christian
Grosu, Anca-L.
Schnell, Oliver
Beck, Juergen
Grauvogel, Juergen
A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome
title A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome
title_full A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome
title_fullStr A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome
title_short A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome
title_sort retrospective evaluation of the retrosigmoidal approach for petroclival meningioma surgery and prognostic factors affecting clinical outcome
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9010819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.786909
work_keys_str_mv AT masalhawaseem aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT heilanddieterhenrik aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT steiertchristine aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT kruegermariet aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT schnelldaniel aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT scheiwechristian aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT grosuancal aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT schnelloliver aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT beckjuergen aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT grauvogeljuergen aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT masalhawaseem retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT heilanddieterhenrik retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT steiertchristine retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT kruegermariet retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT schnelldaniel retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT scheiwechristian retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT grosuancal retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT schnelloliver retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT beckjuergen retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome
AT grauvogeljuergen retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome