Cargando…
A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome
INTRODUCTION: Petroclival meningioma (PCM) remains a major neurosurgical challenge. There are still controversial strategic treatment concepts about surgical approach, the extent of resection, and postoperative radiotherapy. We aimed to evaluate prognostic factors influencing the progression-free su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9010819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.786909 |
_version_ | 1784687566392393728 |
---|---|
author | Masalha, Waseem Heiland, Dieter Henrik Steiert, Christine Krueger, Marie T. Schnell, Daniel Scheiwe, Christian Grosu, Anca-L. Schnell, Oliver Beck, Juergen Grauvogel, Juergen |
author_facet | Masalha, Waseem Heiland, Dieter Henrik Steiert, Christine Krueger, Marie T. Schnell, Daniel Scheiwe, Christian Grosu, Anca-L. Schnell, Oliver Beck, Juergen Grauvogel, Juergen |
author_sort | Masalha, Waseem |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Petroclival meningioma (PCM) remains a major neurosurgical challenge. There are still controversial strategic treatment concepts about surgical approach, the extent of resection, and postoperative radiotherapy. We aimed to evaluate prognostic factors influencing the progression-free survival (PFS) rates of PCM, with a particular focus on the retrosigmoidal approach, the role of the extent of resection, and postoperative radiotherapy. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with complete follow-up data were included. All patients were operated on via a retrosigmoidal approach, of whom 19 underwent gross total resection (GTR) and 70 underwent subtotal resection (STR). In the subgroups of tumors with infiltration of the cavernous sinus, 41 patients received near total resection (NTR) and 24 STR. Thirty-one patients received postoperative radiotherapy of the residual tumor and 58 were treated with surgery alone. Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox regression were used to identify significant factors associated with treatment. RESULTS: GTR (p=0.0107) and postoperative radiotherapy (p=0.014) were associated with significantly improved PFS. Even the subgroup analysis of extended PCM with infiltration of the cavernous sinus (CS) showed an advantage for PFS after near total resection (NTR) (p=0.0017). The additional radiotherapy of the residual tumor in the CS in this subgroup also showed a beneficial effect on PFS (p=0.012). CONCLUSION: The extension of surgical resection remains the most important prognostic factor in relation to oncological outcomes. However, the GTR of extended PCM with infiltration of the CS is associated with significant neurological morbidity and requires additional adjuvant therapy concepts. Postoperative radiotherapy is an important element in the treatment of the residual tumor after surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9010819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90108192022-04-16 A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome Masalha, Waseem Heiland, Dieter Henrik Steiert, Christine Krueger, Marie T. Schnell, Daniel Scheiwe, Christian Grosu, Anca-L. Schnell, Oliver Beck, Juergen Grauvogel, Juergen Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Petroclival meningioma (PCM) remains a major neurosurgical challenge. There are still controversial strategic treatment concepts about surgical approach, the extent of resection, and postoperative radiotherapy. We aimed to evaluate prognostic factors influencing the progression-free survival (PFS) rates of PCM, with a particular focus on the retrosigmoidal approach, the role of the extent of resection, and postoperative radiotherapy. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with complete follow-up data were included. All patients were operated on via a retrosigmoidal approach, of whom 19 underwent gross total resection (GTR) and 70 underwent subtotal resection (STR). In the subgroups of tumors with infiltration of the cavernous sinus, 41 patients received near total resection (NTR) and 24 STR. Thirty-one patients received postoperative radiotherapy of the residual tumor and 58 were treated with surgery alone. Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox regression were used to identify significant factors associated with treatment. RESULTS: GTR (p=0.0107) and postoperative radiotherapy (p=0.014) were associated with significantly improved PFS. Even the subgroup analysis of extended PCM with infiltration of the cavernous sinus (CS) showed an advantage for PFS after near total resection (NTR) (p=0.0017). The additional radiotherapy of the residual tumor in the CS in this subgroup also showed a beneficial effect on PFS (p=0.012). CONCLUSION: The extension of surgical resection remains the most important prognostic factor in relation to oncological outcomes. However, the GTR of extended PCM with infiltration of the CS is associated with significant neurological morbidity and requires additional adjuvant therapy concepts. Postoperative radiotherapy is an important element in the treatment of the residual tumor after surgery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9010819/ /pubmed/35433418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.786909 Text en Copyright © 2022 Masalha, Heiland, Steiert, Krueger, Schnell, Scheiwe, Grosu, Schnell, Beck and Grauvogel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Masalha, Waseem Heiland, Dieter Henrik Steiert, Christine Krueger, Marie T. Schnell, Daniel Scheiwe, Christian Grosu, Anca-L. Schnell, Oliver Beck, Juergen Grauvogel, Juergen A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome |
title | A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome |
title_full | A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome |
title_fullStr | A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome |
title_full_unstemmed | A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome |
title_short | A Retrospective Evaluation of the Retrosigmoidal Approach for Petroclival Meningioma Surgery and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome |
title_sort | retrospective evaluation of the retrosigmoidal approach for petroclival meningioma surgery and prognostic factors affecting clinical outcome |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9010819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.786909 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masalhawaseem aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT heilanddieterhenrik aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT steiertchristine aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT kruegermariet aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT schnelldaniel aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT scheiwechristian aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT grosuancal aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT schnelloliver aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT beckjuergen aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT grauvogeljuergen aretrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT masalhawaseem retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT heilanddieterhenrik retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT steiertchristine retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT kruegermariet retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT schnelldaniel retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT scheiwechristian retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT grosuancal retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT schnelloliver retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT beckjuergen retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome AT grauvogeljuergen retrospectiveevaluationoftheretrosigmoidalapproachforpetroclivalmeningiomasurgeryandprognosticfactorsaffectingclinicaloutcome |