Cargando…

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review

Background: The development of artificial intelligence (AI) in the medical field has been growing rapidly. As AI models have been introduced in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), a systematized review must be performed to understand its current status. Objective: To categorize and seek th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chu, Hongmin, Moon, Seunghwan, Park, Jeongsu, Bak, Seongjun, Ko, Youme, Youn, Bo-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9011141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35431917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.826044
_version_ 1784687623480016896
author Chu, Hongmin
Moon, Seunghwan
Park, Jeongsu
Bak, Seongjun
Ko, Youme
Youn, Bo-Young
author_facet Chu, Hongmin
Moon, Seunghwan
Park, Jeongsu
Bak, Seongjun
Ko, Youme
Youn, Bo-Young
author_sort Chu, Hongmin
collection PubMed
description Background: The development of artificial intelligence (AI) in the medical field has been growing rapidly. As AI models have been introduced in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), a systematized review must be performed to understand its current status. Objective: To categorize and seek the current usage of AI in CAM. Method: A systematic scoping review was conducted based on the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The three databases, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were used to find studies regarding AI and CAM. Only English studies from 2000 were included. Studies without mentioning either AI techniques or CAM modalities were excluded along with the non-peer-reviewed studies. A broad-range search strategy was applied to locate all relevant studies. Results: A total of 32 studies were identified, and three main categories were revealed: 1) acupuncture treatment, 2) tongue and lip diagnoses, and 3) herbal medicine. Other CAM modalities were music therapy, meditation, pulse diagnosis, and TCM syndromes. The majority of the studies utilized AI models to predict certain patterns and find reliable computerized models to assist physicians. Conclusion: Although the results from this review have shown the potential use of AI models in CAM, future research ought to focus on verifying and validating the models by performing a large-scale clinical trial to better promote AI in CAM in the era of digital health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9011141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90111412022-04-16 The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review Chu, Hongmin Moon, Seunghwan Park, Jeongsu Bak, Seongjun Ko, Youme Youn, Bo-Young Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: The development of artificial intelligence (AI) in the medical field has been growing rapidly. As AI models have been introduced in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), a systematized review must be performed to understand its current status. Objective: To categorize and seek the current usage of AI in CAM. Method: A systematic scoping review was conducted based on the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The three databases, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were used to find studies regarding AI and CAM. Only English studies from 2000 were included. Studies without mentioning either AI techniques or CAM modalities were excluded along with the non-peer-reviewed studies. A broad-range search strategy was applied to locate all relevant studies. Results: A total of 32 studies were identified, and three main categories were revealed: 1) acupuncture treatment, 2) tongue and lip diagnoses, and 3) herbal medicine. Other CAM modalities were music therapy, meditation, pulse diagnosis, and TCM syndromes. The majority of the studies utilized AI models to predict certain patterns and find reliable computerized models to assist physicians. Conclusion: Although the results from this review have shown the potential use of AI models in CAM, future research ought to focus on verifying and validating the models by performing a large-scale clinical trial to better promote AI in CAM in the era of digital health. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9011141/ /pubmed/35431917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.826044 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chu, Moon, Park, Bak, Ko and Youn. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Chu, Hongmin
Moon, Seunghwan
Park, Jeongsu
Bak, Seongjun
Ko, Youme
Youn, Bo-Young
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review
title The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_full The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_fullStr The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_short The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_sort use of artificial intelligence in complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic scoping review
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9011141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35431917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.826044
work_keys_str_mv AT chuhongmin theuseofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview
AT moonseunghwan theuseofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview
AT parkjeongsu theuseofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview
AT bakseongjun theuseofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview
AT koyoume theuseofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview
AT younboyoung theuseofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview
AT chuhongmin useofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview
AT moonseunghwan useofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview
AT parkjeongsu useofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview
AT bakseongjun useofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview
AT koyoume useofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview
AT younboyoung useofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview