Cargando…
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review
Background: The development of artificial intelligence (AI) in the medical field has been growing rapidly. As AI models have been introduced in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), a systematized review must be performed to understand its current status. Objective: To categorize and seek th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9011141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35431917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.826044 |
_version_ | 1784687623480016896 |
---|---|
author | Chu, Hongmin Moon, Seunghwan Park, Jeongsu Bak, Seongjun Ko, Youme Youn, Bo-Young |
author_facet | Chu, Hongmin Moon, Seunghwan Park, Jeongsu Bak, Seongjun Ko, Youme Youn, Bo-Young |
author_sort | Chu, Hongmin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The development of artificial intelligence (AI) in the medical field has been growing rapidly. As AI models have been introduced in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), a systematized review must be performed to understand its current status. Objective: To categorize and seek the current usage of AI in CAM. Method: A systematic scoping review was conducted based on the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The three databases, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were used to find studies regarding AI and CAM. Only English studies from 2000 were included. Studies without mentioning either AI techniques or CAM modalities were excluded along with the non-peer-reviewed studies. A broad-range search strategy was applied to locate all relevant studies. Results: A total of 32 studies were identified, and three main categories were revealed: 1) acupuncture treatment, 2) tongue and lip diagnoses, and 3) herbal medicine. Other CAM modalities were music therapy, meditation, pulse diagnosis, and TCM syndromes. The majority of the studies utilized AI models to predict certain patterns and find reliable computerized models to assist physicians. Conclusion: Although the results from this review have shown the potential use of AI models in CAM, future research ought to focus on verifying and validating the models by performing a large-scale clinical trial to better promote AI in CAM in the era of digital health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9011141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90111412022-04-16 The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review Chu, Hongmin Moon, Seunghwan Park, Jeongsu Bak, Seongjun Ko, Youme Youn, Bo-Young Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: The development of artificial intelligence (AI) in the medical field has been growing rapidly. As AI models have been introduced in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), a systematized review must be performed to understand its current status. Objective: To categorize and seek the current usage of AI in CAM. Method: A systematic scoping review was conducted based on the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The three databases, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were used to find studies regarding AI and CAM. Only English studies from 2000 were included. Studies without mentioning either AI techniques or CAM modalities were excluded along with the non-peer-reviewed studies. A broad-range search strategy was applied to locate all relevant studies. Results: A total of 32 studies were identified, and three main categories were revealed: 1) acupuncture treatment, 2) tongue and lip diagnoses, and 3) herbal medicine. Other CAM modalities were music therapy, meditation, pulse diagnosis, and TCM syndromes. The majority of the studies utilized AI models to predict certain patterns and find reliable computerized models to assist physicians. Conclusion: Although the results from this review have shown the potential use of AI models in CAM, future research ought to focus on verifying and validating the models by performing a large-scale clinical trial to better promote AI in CAM in the era of digital health. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9011141/ /pubmed/35431917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.826044 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chu, Moon, Park, Bak, Ko and Youn. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Chu, Hongmin Moon, Seunghwan Park, Jeongsu Bak, Seongjun Ko, Youme Youn, Bo-Young The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review |
title | The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review |
title_full | The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review |
title_short | The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review |
title_sort | use of artificial intelligence in complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic scoping review |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9011141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35431917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.826044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chuhongmin theuseofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview AT moonseunghwan theuseofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview AT parkjeongsu theuseofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview AT bakseongjun theuseofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview AT koyoume theuseofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview AT younboyoung theuseofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview AT chuhongmin useofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview AT moonseunghwan useofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview AT parkjeongsu useofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview AT bakseongjun useofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview AT koyoume useofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview AT younboyoung useofartificialintelligenceincomplementaryandalternativemedicineasystematicscopingreview |