Cargando…

Physiological comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a heating environment

BACKGROUND: Indoor airflow and thermal comfort are difficult to assess through subjective evaluations because airflow sensations can differ based on various factors, such as personal characteristics, interests, preferences, and the current state of mind. Thus, subjective evaluations should be combin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tamura, Kaori, Matsumoto, Sayaka, Tseng, Yu Hsuan, Kobayashi, Takayuki, Miwa, Jun’ichi, Miyazawa, Ken’ichi, Matsumoto, Soichiro, Hiramatsu, Seiji, Otake, Hiroyuki, Okamoto, Tsuyoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-022-00289-x
_version_ 1784687715856416768
author Tamura, Kaori
Matsumoto, Sayaka
Tseng, Yu Hsuan
Kobayashi, Takayuki
Miwa, Jun’ichi
Miyazawa, Ken’ichi
Matsumoto, Soichiro
Hiramatsu, Seiji
Otake, Hiroyuki
Okamoto, Tsuyoshi
author_facet Tamura, Kaori
Matsumoto, Sayaka
Tseng, Yu Hsuan
Kobayashi, Takayuki
Miwa, Jun’ichi
Miyazawa, Ken’ichi
Matsumoto, Soichiro
Hiramatsu, Seiji
Otake, Hiroyuki
Okamoto, Tsuyoshi
author_sort Tamura, Kaori
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Indoor airflow and thermal comfort are difficult to assess through subjective evaluations because airflow sensations can differ based on various factors, such as personal characteristics, interests, preferences, and the current state of mind. Thus, subjective evaluations should be combined with objective assessments, such as physiological measurements. This study evaluated airflow and thermal comfort through physiological measurements, including skin temperature, electroencephalography, respiration, and electrocardiography, in addition to subjective evaluations. METHODS: Twenty participants entered a test room at 30 °C after staying in an acclimation room at 18 °C for 20 min. They were exposed to indirect and direct airflow toward their faces and performed four tasks under each condition: resting, counting to 10 s following time alerts, counting to 10 s in the mind, and mental calculation. The mean speed of the air directed to the participants’ faces was 0.123 m/s and 0.225 m/s in the indirect and direct conditions, respectively. RESULTS: The gamma and beta bands of electroencephalograms taken at the left-temporal (T3) and left-parietal (P7) sites showed significantly lower amplitudes under the indirect condition (gamma, T3: p = 0.034, P7: p = 0.030; beta, T3: p = 0.051, P7: p = 0.028). Similarly, the variability of respiration was lower under the indirect condition (p < 0.010). The amplitudes of gamma and beta waves showed significant correlations with anxiousness levels (gamma, T3: r = 0.41; beta, T3: r = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that indirect heating airflow causes lower mental stress and fatigue than those induced by direct flow, which is equivalent to more comfort. The results of this study suggest that physiological measurements can be used for the evaluation of unconscious indoor comfort, which cannot be detected by subjective evaluations alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40101-022-00289-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9012013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90120132022-04-16 Physiological comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a heating environment Tamura, Kaori Matsumoto, Sayaka Tseng, Yu Hsuan Kobayashi, Takayuki Miwa, Jun’ichi Miyazawa, Ken’ichi Matsumoto, Soichiro Hiramatsu, Seiji Otake, Hiroyuki Okamoto, Tsuyoshi J Physiol Anthropol Original Article BACKGROUND: Indoor airflow and thermal comfort are difficult to assess through subjective evaluations because airflow sensations can differ based on various factors, such as personal characteristics, interests, preferences, and the current state of mind. Thus, subjective evaluations should be combined with objective assessments, such as physiological measurements. This study evaluated airflow and thermal comfort through physiological measurements, including skin temperature, electroencephalography, respiration, and electrocardiography, in addition to subjective evaluations. METHODS: Twenty participants entered a test room at 30 °C after staying in an acclimation room at 18 °C for 20 min. They were exposed to indirect and direct airflow toward their faces and performed four tasks under each condition: resting, counting to 10 s following time alerts, counting to 10 s in the mind, and mental calculation. The mean speed of the air directed to the participants’ faces was 0.123 m/s and 0.225 m/s in the indirect and direct conditions, respectively. RESULTS: The gamma and beta bands of electroencephalograms taken at the left-temporal (T3) and left-parietal (P7) sites showed significantly lower amplitudes under the indirect condition (gamma, T3: p = 0.034, P7: p = 0.030; beta, T3: p = 0.051, P7: p = 0.028). Similarly, the variability of respiration was lower under the indirect condition (p < 0.010). The amplitudes of gamma and beta waves showed significant correlations with anxiousness levels (gamma, T3: r = 0.41; beta, T3: r = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that indirect heating airflow causes lower mental stress and fatigue than those induced by direct flow, which is equivalent to more comfort. The results of this study suggest that physiological measurements can be used for the evaluation of unconscious indoor comfort, which cannot be detected by subjective evaluations alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40101-022-00289-x. BioMed Central 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9012013/ /pubmed/35428365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-022-00289-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tamura, Kaori
Matsumoto, Sayaka
Tseng, Yu Hsuan
Kobayashi, Takayuki
Miwa, Jun’ichi
Miyazawa, Ken’ichi
Matsumoto, Soichiro
Hiramatsu, Seiji
Otake, Hiroyuki
Okamoto, Tsuyoshi
Physiological comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a heating environment
title Physiological comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a heating environment
title_full Physiological comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a heating environment
title_fullStr Physiological comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a heating environment
title_full_unstemmed Physiological comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a heating environment
title_short Physiological comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a heating environment
title_sort physiological comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a heating environment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-022-00289-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tamurakaori physiologicalcomfortevaluationunderdifferentairflowdirectionsinaheatingenvironment
AT matsumotosayaka physiologicalcomfortevaluationunderdifferentairflowdirectionsinaheatingenvironment
AT tsengyuhsuan physiologicalcomfortevaluationunderdifferentairflowdirectionsinaheatingenvironment
AT kobayashitakayuki physiologicalcomfortevaluationunderdifferentairflowdirectionsinaheatingenvironment
AT miwajunichi physiologicalcomfortevaluationunderdifferentairflowdirectionsinaheatingenvironment
AT miyazawakenichi physiologicalcomfortevaluationunderdifferentairflowdirectionsinaheatingenvironment
AT matsumotosoichiro physiologicalcomfortevaluationunderdifferentairflowdirectionsinaheatingenvironment
AT hiramatsuseiji physiologicalcomfortevaluationunderdifferentairflowdirectionsinaheatingenvironment
AT otakehiroyuki physiologicalcomfortevaluationunderdifferentairflowdirectionsinaheatingenvironment
AT okamototsuyoshi physiologicalcomfortevaluationunderdifferentairflowdirectionsinaheatingenvironment