Cargando…
The Prediction Model Using Thyroid-stimulating Immunoglobulin Bioassay For Relapse of Graves’ Disease
OBJECTIVE: Thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) bioassay has a better ability to predict the relapse rate of Graves’ disease (GD) than the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin method in terms of measuring the TSH receptor antibody. However, the optimal TSI bioassay...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35441120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac023 |
_version_ | 1784687772473229312 |
---|---|
author | Baek, Han-Sang Lee, Jaejun Jeong, Chai-Ho Lee, Jeongmin Ha, Jeonghoon Jo, Kwanhoon Kim, Min-Hee Cho, Jae Hyoung Kang, Moo Il Lim, Dong-Jun |
author_facet | Baek, Han-Sang Lee, Jaejun Jeong, Chai-Ho Lee, Jeongmin Ha, Jeonghoon Jo, Kwanhoon Kim, Min-Hee Cho, Jae Hyoung Kang, Moo Il Lim, Dong-Jun |
author_sort | Baek, Han-Sang |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) bioassay has a better ability to predict the relapse rate of Graves’ disease (GD) than the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin method in terms of measuring the TSH receptor antibody. However, the optimal TSI bioassay cutoff for predicting relapse after antithyroid drug (ATD) withdrawal is not well evaluated. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled GD patients who had been treated with ATD and obtained their TSI bioassay <140% from January 2010 to December 2019 in a referral hospital. RESULTS: Among 219 study subjects, 86 patients (39.3%) experienced relapse. The TSI bioassay value of 66.5% significantly predicted the relapse of GD (P = 0.049). The group with a TSI bioassay value > 66.5% were expected to show a 23.8% relapse rate at 2 from ATD withdrawal, and the group with a TSI < 66.5% had a 12.7% relapse rate based on Kaplan-Meier curves analysis. The TSI bioassay showed a good ability to predict relapse GD in the female group (P = 0.041) but did not in the male group (P = 0.573). The risk scoring based on the nomogram with risk factors for GD relapse, which was constructed to overcome the limitation, increased the predictive ability of GD relapse by 11.5% compared to the use of the TSI bioassay alone. CONCLUSIONS: The cutoff value of the TSI bioassay to predict GD relapse should be lower than that for diagnosing GD. However, as the single use of the TSI bioassay has limitations, a nomogram with multiple risk factors including TSI bioassay could be helpful to predict GD relapse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9012332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90123322022-04-18 The Prediction Model Using Thyroid-stimulating Immunoglobulin Bioassay For Relapse of Graves’ Disease Baek, Han-Sang Lee, Jaejun Jeong, Chai-Ho Lee, Jeongmin Ha, Jeonghoon Jo, Kwanhoon Kim, Min-Hee Cho, Jae Hyoung Kang, Moo Il Lim, Dong-Jun J Endocr Soc Clinical Research Article OBJECTIVE: Thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) bioassay has a better ability to predict the relapse rate of Graves’ disease (GD) than the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin method in terms of measuring the TSH receptor antibody. However, the optimal TSI bioassay cutoff for predicting relapse after antithyroid drug (ATD) withdrawal is not well evaluated. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled GD patients who had been treated with ATD and obtained their TSI bioassay <140% from January 2010 to December 2019 in a referral hospital. RESULTS: Among 219 study subjects, 86 patients (39.3%) experienced relapse. The TSI bioassay value of 66.5% significantly predicted the relapse of GD (P = 0.049). The group with a TSI bioassay value > 66.5% were expected to show a 23.8% relapse rate at 2 from ATD withdrawal, and the group with a TSI < 66.5% had a 12.7% relapse rate based on Kaplan-Meier curves analysis. The TSI bioassay showed a good ability to predict relapse GD in the female group (P = 0.041) but did not in the male group (P = 0.573). The risk scoring based on the nomogram with risk factors for GD relapse, which was constructed to overcome the limitation, increased the predictive ability of GD relapse by 11.5% compared to the use of the TSI bioassay alone. CONCLUSIONS: The cutoff value of the TSI bioassay to predict GD relapse should be lower than that for diagnosing GD. However, as the single use of the TSI bioassay has limitations, a nomogram with multiple risk factors including TSI bioassay could be helpful to predict GD relapse. Oxford University Press 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9012332/ /pubmed/35441120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac023 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Article Baek, Han-Sang Lee, Jaejun Jeong, Chai-Ho Lee, Jeongmin Ha, Jeonghoon Jo, Kwanhoon Kim, Min-Hee Cho, Jae Hyoung Kang, Moo Il Lim, Dong-Jun The Prediction Model Using Thyroid-stimulating Immunoglobulin Bioassay For Relapse of Graves’ Disease |
title | The Prediction Model Using Thyroid-stimulating Immunoglobulin Bioassay For Relapse of Graves’ Disease |
title_full | The Prediction Model Using Thyroid-stimulating Immunoglobulin Bioassay For Relapse of Graves’ Disease |
title_fullStr | The Prediction Model Using Thyroid-stimulating Immunoglobulin Bioassay For Relapse of Graves’ Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prediction Model Using Thyroid-stimulating Immunoglobulin Bioassay For Relapse of Graves’ Disease |
title_short | The Prediction Model Using Thyroid-stimulating Immunoglobulin Bioassay For Relapse of Graves’ Disease |
title_sort | prediction model using thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin bioassay for relapse of graves’ disease |
topic | Clinical Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35441120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baekhansang thepredictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT leejaejun thepredictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT jeongchaiho thepredictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT leejeongmin thepredictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT hajeonghoon thepredictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT jokwanhoon thepredictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT kimminhee thepredictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT chojaehyoung thepredictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT kangmooil thepredictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT limdongjun thepredictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT baekhansang predictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT leejaejun predictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT jeongchaiho predictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT leejeongmin predictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT hajeonghoon predictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT jokwanhoon predictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT kimminhee predictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT chojaehyoung predictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT kangmooil predictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease AT limdongjun predictionmodelusingthyroidstimulatingimmunoglobulinbioassayforrelapseofgravesdisease |