Cargando…

Simplified hypertension screening methods across 60 countries: An observational study

BACKGROUND: Simplified blood pressure (BP) screening approaches have been proposed. However, evidence is limited to a few countries and has not documented the cardiovascular risk amongst missed hypertension cases, limiting the uptake of these simplified approaches. We quantified the proportion of mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carrillo-Larco, Rodrigo M., Guzman-Vilca, Wilmer Cristobal, Neupane, Dinesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35363792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003975
_version_ 1784687784402878464
author Carrillo-Larco, Rodrigo M.
Guzman-Vilca, Wilmer Cristobal
Neupane, Dinesh
author_facet Carrillo-Larco, Rodrigo M.
Guzman-Vilca, Wilmer Cristobal
Neupane, Dinesh
author_sort Carrillo-Larco, Rodrigo M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Simplified blood pressure (BP) screening approaches have been proposed. However, evidence is limited to a few countries and has not documented the cardiovascular risk amongst missed hypertension cases, limiting the uptake of these simplified approaches. We quantified the proportion of missed, over-diagnosed, and consistently identified hypertension cases and the 10-year cardiovascular risk in these groups. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used 60 WHO STEPS surveys (cross-sectional and nationally representative; n = 145,174) conducted in 60 countries in 6 world regions between 2004 and 2019. Nine simplified approaches were compared against the standard (average of the last 2 of 3 BP measurements). The 10-year cardiovascular risk was computed with the 2019 World Health Organization Cardiovascular Risk Charts. We used t tests to compare the cardiovascular risk between the missed and over-diagnosed cases and the consistent hypertension cases. We used Poisson multilevel regressions to identify risk factors for missed cases (adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and 10-year cardiovascular risk). Across all countries, compared to the standard approach, the simplified approach that missed the fewest cases was using the second BP reading if the first BP reading was 130–145/80–95 mm Hg (5.62%); using only the second BP reading missed 5.82%. The simplified approach with the smallest over-diagnosis proportion was using the second BP reading if the first BP measurement was ≥140/90 mm Hg (3.03%). In many countries, cardiovascular risk was not significantly different between the missed and consistent hypertension groups, yet the mean was slightly lower amongst missed cases. Cardiovascular risk was positively associated with missed hypertension depending on the simplified approach. The main limitation of the work is the cross-sectional design. CONCLUSIONS: Simplified BP screening approaches seem to have low misdiagnosis rates, and cardiovascular risk could be lower amongst missed cases than amongst consistent hypertension cases. Simplified BP screening approaches could be included in large screening programmes and busy clinics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9012386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90123862022-04-16 Simplified hypertension screening methods across 60 countries: An observational study Carrillo-Larco, Rodrigo M. Guzman-Vilca, Wilmer Cristobal Neupane, Dinesh PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Simplified blood pressure (BP) screening approaches have been proposed. However, evidence is limited to a few countries and has not documented the cardiovascular risk amongst missed hypertension cases, limiting the uptake of these simplified approaches. We quantified the proportion of missed, over-diagnosed, and consistently identified hypertension cases and the 10-year cardiovascular risk in these groups. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used 60 WHO STEPS surveys (cross-sectional and nationally representative; n = 145,174) conducted in 60 countries in 6 world regions between 2004 and 2019. Nine simplified approaches were compared against the standard (average of the last 2 of 3 BP measurements). The 10-year cardiovascular risk was computed with the 2019 World Health Organization Cardiovascular Risk Charts. We used t tests to compare the cardiovascular risk between the missed and over-diagnosed cases and the consistent hypertension cases. We used Poisson multilevel regressions to identify risk factors for missed cases (adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and 10-year cardiovascular risk). Across all countries, compared to the standard approach, the simplified approach that missed the fewest cases was using the second BP reading if the first BP reading was 130–145/80–95 mm Hg (5.62%); using only the second BP reading missed 5.82%. The simplified approach with the smallest over-diagnosis proportion was using the second BP reading if the first BP measurement was ≥140/90 mm Hg (3.03%). In many countries, cardiovascular risk was not significantly different between the missed and consistent hypertension groups, yet the mean was slightly lower amongst missed cases. Cardiovascular risk was positively associated with missed hypertension depending on the simplified approach. The main limitation of the work is the cross-sectional design. CONCLUSIONS: Simplified BP screening approaches seem to have low misdiagnosis rates, and cardiovascular risk could be lower amongst missed cases than amongst consistent hypertension cases. Simplified BP screening approaches could be included in large screening programmes and busy clinics. Public Library of Science 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9012386/ /pubmed/35363792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003975 Text en © 2022 Carrillo-Larco et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Carrillo-Larco, Rodrigo M.
Guzman-Vilca, Wilmer Cristobal
Neupane, Dinesh
Simplified hypertension screening methods across 60 countries: An observational study
title Simplified hypertension screening methods across 60 countries: An observational study
title_full Simplified hypertension screening methods across 60 countries: An observational study
title_fullStr Simplified hypertension screening methods across 60 countries: An observational study
title_full_unstemmed Simplified hypertension screening methods across 60 countries: An observational study
title_short Simplified hypertension screening methods across 60 countries: An observational study
title_sort simplified hypertension screening methods across 60 countries: an observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35363792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003975
work_keys_str_mv AT carrillolarcorodrigom simplifiedhypertensionscreeningmethodsacross60countriesanobservationalstudy
AT guzmanvilcawilmercristobal simplifiedhypertensionscreeningmethodsacross60countriesanobservationalstudy
AT neupanedinesh simplifiedhypertensionscreeningmethodsacross60countriesanobservationalstudy