Cargando…

Refractive and visual function changes in twilight conditions

PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of luminance on refraction and visual function under twilight conditions. METHODS: Twenty young adults (mean age 20.5 ± 0.5 years) without ocular diseases and 20 eyes were included in the study. Subjective and objective spherical equivalent power (SE), logMAR, pup...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iizuka, Tatsuya, Kawamorita, Takushi, Handa, Tomoya, Ishikawa, Hitoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35427398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267149
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of luminance on refraction and visual function under twilight conditions. METHODS: Twenty young adults (mean age 20.5 ± 0.5 years) without ocular diseases and 20 eyes were included in the study. Subjective and objective spherical equivalent power (SE), logMAR, pupil diameter, ocular aberration, and ocular axial length were evaluated. Measurements were conducted in a light room with high luminance (300 cd/m(2)) targets (photopic), in a dark room with low luminance (10 cd/m(2)) targets (twilight), and a dark room after 15 min of adaptation to low luminance (10 cd/m(2)) targets (after adaptation: AA). Differences between the three conditions were analyzed using the Friedman test and Scheffe’s multiple comparisons. RESULTS: The results of logMAR were -0.20 ± 0.07, -0.08 ± 0.08, and -0.11 ± 0.08 in photopic, twilight, and AA, respectively, with significant differences between photopic and twilight (p < 0.001) and between photopic and AA (p < 0.001). Then subjective SE were -3.58 ± 2.04 D, -3.75 ± 2.08 D, and -3.74 ± 2.04 D in photopic, twilight, and AA, respectively, with significant differences between photopic and twilight (p = 0.007) and photopic and AA (p = 0.023). However, none of the other objective SEs produced a significant difference (p = 0.63). The pupil diameter and ocular aberration changed significantly in all conditions (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Subjective myopic refraction increased and visual resolution decreased in younger subjects. However, this change in refraction is less than one level (±0.25 D) in clinical optometry, so fully corrected eyeglasses are important when assuming refraction in twilight, and there is no need for additional correction.