Cargando…

The impact of delaying colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer detection and prevention

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a partial to total shutdown of endoscopy in many healthcare centers. This study aims to quantify the impact of the reduction in colonoscopies on colorectal cancer (CRC) detection and screening. METHODS: After institutional ethics board approval, the endosco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holland, Jessica, Cwintal, Michelle, Rigas, Georgia, Pang, Allison J., Vasilevsky, Carol-Ann, Morin, Nancy, Ghitulescu, Gabriela, Faria, Julio, Boutros, Marylise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09211-z
_version_ 1784687811592454144
author Holland, Jessica
Cwintal, Michelle
Rigas, Georgia
Pang, Allison J.
Vasilevsky, Carol-Ann
Morin, Nancy
Ghitulescu, Gabriela
Faria, Julio
Boutros, Marylise
author_facet Holland, Jessica
Cwintal, Michelle
Rigas, Georgia
Pang, Allison J.
Vasilevsky, Carol-Ann
Morin, Nancy
Ghitulescu, Gabriela
Faria, Julio
Boutros, Marylise
author_sort Holland, Jessica
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a partial to total shutdown of endoscopy in many healthcare centers. This study aims to quantify the impact of the reduction in colonoscopies on colorectal cancer (CRC) detection and screening. METHODS: After institutional ethics board approval, the endoscopy database at an academic tertiary-care center in Montreal, Canada, was searched for all colonoscopies performed from during the first wave locally (March–June 2020), and during the ramp up period where endoscopy service resumed (July to August 2020). We compared these periods to the same periods in 2019, the pre-pandemic periods. The indications, CRC and adenoma detection rates, as well as the prioritization of urgent procedures were compared. RESULTS: In the first wave, only 462 colonoscopies were performed, compared to 2515 in the same period in 2019, an 82% reduction. The ramp up period saw 843 colonoscopies performed compared to 1328 in 2019, a 35% reduction. Urgent and inpatient colonoscopies numbers increased (324 (24.8%) vs. 220 (5.7%)) while surveillance and high-risk screening colonoscopies fell (376 (28.8%) vs 1869 (48.6%)). Emergency access to colonoscopy was preserved with a median time to endoscopy of < 1 day (IQR 0,1) in both pandemic periods. During the pandemic periods, there was an absolute reduction in CRC diagnosis of 28, despite the CRC detection per colonoscopy rate increasing slightly in the first wave from 1.7% (44) to 3.9% (18), and in the ramp up period from 2.5% (33) to 3.6% (31). The rate of adenoma detection per colonoscopy did not increase significantly between the pre- and pandemic periods, resulting in reduction in adenoma removal in 723 patients. DISCUSSION: The restriction of access to colonoscopy resulted in a significant reduction in screening and surveillance of high-risk patients, adenomas removed, and CRCs diagnosed. Clinicians and patients will face the oncologic ramifications this the coming years. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09211-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9012515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90125152022-04-18 The impact of delaying colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer detection and prevention Holland, Jessica Cwintal, Michelle Rigas, Georgia Pang, Allison J. Vasilevsky, Carol-Ann Morin, Nancy Ghitulescu, Gabriela Faria, Julio Boutros, Marylise Surg Endosc 2021 SAGES Oral PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a partial to total shutdown of endoscopy in many healthcare centers. This study aims to quantify the impact of the reduction in colonoscopies on colorectal cancer (CRC) detection and screening. METHODS: After institutional ethics board approval, the endoscopy database at an academic tertiary-care center in Montreal, Canada, was searched for all colonoscopies performed from during the first wave locally (March–June 2020), and during the ramp up period where endoscopy service resumed (July to August 2020). We compared these periods to the same periods in 2019, the pre-pandemic periods. The indications, CRC and adenoma detection rates, as well as the prioritization of urgent procedures were compared. RESULTS: In the first wave, only 462 colonoscopies were performed, compared to 2515 in the same period in 2019, an 82% reduction. The ramp up period saw 843 colonoscopies performed compared to 1328 in 2019, a 35% reduction. Urgent and inpatient colonoscopies numbers increased (324 (24.8%) vs. 220 (5.7%)) while surveillance and high-risk screening colonoscopies fell (376 (28.8%) vs 1869 (48.6%)). Emergency access to colonoscopy was preserved with a median time to endoscopy of < 1 day (IQR 0,1) in both pandemic periods. During the pandemic periods, there was an absolute reduction in CRC diagnosis of 28, despite the CRC detection per colonoscopy rate increasing slightly in the first wave from 1.7% (44) to 3.9% (18), and in the ramp up period from 2.5% (33) to 3.6% (31). The rate of adenoma detection per colonoscopy did not increase significantly between the pre- and pandemic periods, resulting in reduction in adenoma removal in 723 patients. DISCUSSION: The restriction of access to colonoscopy resulted in a significant reduction in screening and surveillance of high-risk patients, adenomas removed, and CRCs diagnosed. Clinicians and patients will face the oncologic ramifications this the coming years. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09211-z. Springer US 2022-04-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9012515/ /pubmed/35428894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09211-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle 2021 SAGES Oral
Holland, Jessica
Cwintal, Michelle
Rigas, Georgia
Pang, Allison J.
Vasilevsky, Carol-Ann
Morin, Nancy
Ghitulescu, Gabriela
Faria, Julio
Boutros, Marylise
The impact of delaying colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer detection and prevention
title The impact of delaying colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer detection and prevention
title_full The impact of delaying colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer detection and prevention
title_fullStr The impact of delaying colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer detection and prevention
title_full_unstemmed The impact of delaying colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer detection and prevention
title_short The impact of delaying colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer detection and prevention
title_sort impact of delaying colonoscopies during the covid-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer detection and prevention
topic 2021 SAGES Oral
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09211-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hollandjessica theimpactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT cwintalmichelle theimpactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT rigasgeorgia theimpactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT pangallisonj theimpactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT vasilevskycarolann theimpactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT morinnancy theimpactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT ghitulescugabriela theimpactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT fariajulio theimpactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT boutrosmarylise theimpactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT hollandjessica impactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT cwintalmichelle impactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT rigasgeorgia impactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT pangallisonj impactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT vasilevskycarolann impactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT morinnancy impactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT ghitulescugabriela impactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT fariajulio impactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention
AT boutrosmarylise impactofdelayingcolonoscopiesduringthecovid19pandemiconcolorectalcancerdetectionandprevention