Effectiveness of Different Algorithms and Cut-off Value in Preeclampsia First Trimester Screening

RESULTS: For the cut-off point >1 : 150, 86 women at an increased risk of eo-PE using algorithm 1 were identified. Of these 86 patients, 83 (96%) were identified using algorithm 2, 62 (72%) using algorithm 3, and 60 (69%) using algorithm 4. In addition, it was demonstrated that between 21% and 29...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tousty, Piotr, Czuba, Bartosz, Borowski, Dariusz, Fraszczyk-Tousty, Magda, Dzidek, Sylwia, Kwiatkowska, Ewa, Cymbaluk-Płoska, Aneta, Torbé, Andrzej, Kwiatkowski, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6414857
Descripción
Sumario:RESULTS: For the cut-off point >1 : 150, 86 women at an increased risk of eo-PE using algorithm 1 were identified. Of these 86 patients, 83 (96%) were identified using algorithm 2, 62 (72%) using algorithm 3, and 60 (69%) using algorithm 4. In addition, it was demonstrated that between 21% and 29% of women at a low risk of eo-PE could be given acetylsalicylic acid if a screening test was used that did not account for PlGF. CONCLUSIONS: In order to provide the highest level of health care to pregnant women, it is extremely important that full screening for eo-PE should be ensured. The cheapest algorithm based only on MAP and UtPI resulted in our patients being unnecessarily exposed to complications.

Ejemplares similares